This is a post co-written with Rivlin Pereira & Vaibhav Pandey from Tanzu CloudHealth (VMware by Broadcom).

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth is the cloud cost management platform of choice for more than 20,000 organizations worldwide, who rely on it to optimize and govern their largest and most complex multi-cloud environments. In this post, we discuss how the VMware Tanzu CloudHealth DevOps team migrated their self-managed Apache Kafka workloads (running version 2.0) to Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) running version 2.6.2. We discuss the system architectures, deployment pipelines, topic creation, observability, access control, topic migration, and all the issues we faced with the existing infrastructure, along with how and why we migrated to the new Kafka setup and some lessons learned.

Kafka cluster overview

In the fast-evolving landscape of distributed systems, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth’s next-generation microservices platform relies on Kafka as its messaging backbone. For us, Kafka’s high-performance distributed log system excels in handling massive data streams, making it indispensable for seamless communication. Serving as a distributed log system, Kafka efficiently captures and stores diverse logs, from HTTP server access logs to security event audit logs.

Kafka’s versatility shines in supporting key messaging patterns, treating messages as basic logs or structured key-value stores. Dynamic partitioning and consistent ordering ensure efficient message organization. The unwavering reliability of Kafka aligns with our commitment to data integrity.

The integration of Ruby services with Kafka is streamlined through the Karafka library, acting as a higher-level wrapper. Our other language stack services use similar wrappers. Kafka’s robust debugging features and administrative commands play a pivotal role in ensuring smooth operations and infrastructure health.

Kafka as an architectural pillar

In VMware Tanzu CloudHealth’s next-generation microservices platform, Kafka emerges as a critical architectural pillar. Its ability to handle high data rates, support diverse messaging patterns, and guarantee message delivery aligns seamlessly with our operational needs. As we continue to innovate and scale, Kafka remains a steadfast companion, enabling us to build a resilient and efficient infrastructure.

Why we migrated to Amazon MSK

For us, migrating to Amazon MSK came down to three key decision points:

• Simplified technical operations – Running Kafka on a self-managed infrastructure was an operational overhead for us. We hadn’t updated Kafka version 2.0.0 for a while, and Kafka brokers were going down in production, causing issues with topics going offline. We also had to run scripts manually for increasing replication factors and rebalancing leaders, which was additional manual effort.
• Deprecated legacy pipelines and simplified permissions – We were looking to move away from our existing pipelines written in Ansible to create Kafka topics on the cluster. We also had a cumbersome process of giving team members access to Kafka machines in staging and production, and we wanted to simplify this.
• Cost, patching, and support – Because Apache Zookeeper is completely managed and patched by AWS, moving to Amazon MSK was going to save us time and money. In addition, we discovered that running Amazon MSK with the same type of brokers on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) was cheaper to run on Amazon MSK. Combined with the fact that we get security patches applied on brokers by AWS, migrating to Amazon MSK was an easy decision. This also meant that the team was freed up to work on other important things. Finally, getting enterprise support from AWS was also critical in our final decision to move to a managed solution.

How we migrated to Amazon MSK

With the key drivers identified, we moved ahead with a proposed design to migrate existing self-managed Kafka to Amazon MSK. We conducted the following pre-migration steps before the actual implementation:

• Assessment:
  • Conducted a meticulous assessment of the existing EC2 Kafka cluster, understanding its configurations and dependencies
  • Verified Kafka version compatibility with Amazon MSK
• Amazon MSK setup with Terraform
• Network configuration:
  • Ensured seamless network connectivity between the EC2 Kafka and MSK clusters, fine-tuning security groups and firewall settings

After the pre-migration steps, we implemented the following for the new design:

• Automated deployment, upgrade, and topic creation pipelines for MSK clusters:
  • In the new setup, we wanted to have automated deployments and upgrades of the MSK clusters in a repeatable fashion using an IaC tool. Therefore, we created custom Terraform modules for MSK cluster deployments as well as upgrades. These modules where called from a Jenkins pipeline for automated deployments and upgrades of the MSK clusters. For Kafka topic creation, we were using an Ansible-based home-grown pipeline, which wasn’t stable and led to a lot of complaints from dev teams. As a result, we evaluated options for deployments to Kubernetes clusters and used the Strimzi Topic Operator to create topics on MSK clusters. Topic creation was automated using Jenkins pipelines, which dev teams could self-service.
• Better observability for clusters:
  • The old Kafka clusters didn’t have good observability. We only had alerts on Kafka broker disk size. With Amazon MSK, we took advantage of open monitoring using Prometheus. We stood up a standalone Prometheus server that scraped metrics from MSK clusters and sent them to our internal observability tool. As a result of improved observability, we were able to set up robust alerting for Amazon MSK, which wasn’t possible with our old setup.
• Improved COGS and better compute infrastructure:
  • For our old Kafka infrastructure, we had to pay for managing Kafka, Zookeeper instances, plus any additional broker storage costs and data transfer costs. With the move to Amazon MSK, because Zookeeper is completely managed by AWS, we only have to pay for Kafka nodes, broker storage, and data transfer costs. As a result, in final Amazon MSK setup for production, we saved not only on infrastructure costs but also operational costs.
• Simplified operations and enhanced security:
  • With the move to Amazon MSK, we didn’t have to manage any Zookeeper instances. Broker security patching was also taken care by AWS for us.
  • Cluster upgrades became simpler with the move to Amazon MSK; it’s a straightforward process to initiate from the Amazon MSK console.
  • With Amazon MSK, we got broker automatic scaling out of the box. As a result, we didn’t have to worry about brokers running out of disk space, thereby leading to additional stability of the MSK cluster.
  • We also got additional security for the cluster because Amazon MSK supports encryption at rest by default, and various options for encryption in transit are also available. For more information, refer to Data protection in Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka.

During our pre-migration steps, we validated the setup on the staging environment before moving ahead with production.

Kafka topic migration strategy

With the MSK cluster setup complete, we performed a data migration of Kafka topics from the old cluster running on Amazon EC2 to the new MSK cluster. To achieve this, we performed the following steps:

• Set up MirrorMaker with Terraform – We used Terraform to orchestrate the deployment of a MirrorMaker cluster consisting of 15 nodes. This demonstrated the scalability and flexibility by adjusting the number of nodes based on the migration’s concurrent replication needs.
• Implement a concurrent replication strategy – We implemented a concurrent replication strategy with 15 MirrorMaker nodes to expedite the migration process. Our Terraform-driven approach contributed to cost optimization by efficiently managing resources during the migration and ensured the reliability and consistency of the MSK and MirrorMaker clusters. It also showcased how the chosen setup accelerates data transfer, optimizing both time and resources.
• Migrate data – We successfully migrated 2 TB of data in a remarkably short timeframe, minimizing downtime and showcasing the efficiency of the concurrent replication strategy.
• Set up post-migration monitoring – We implemented robust monitoring and alerting during the migration, contributing to a smooth process by identifying and addressing issues promptly.

The following diagram illustrates the architecture after the topic migration was complete.

Challenges and lessons learned

Embarking on a migration journey, especially with large datasets, is often accompanied by unforeseen challenges. In this section, we delve into the challenges encountered during the migration of topics from EC2 Kafka to Amazon MSK using MirrorMaker, and share valuable insights and solutions that shaped the success of our migration.

Challenge 1: Offset discrepancies

One of the challenges we encountered was the mismatch in topic offsets between the source and destination clusters, even with offset synchronization enabled in MirrorMaker. The lesson learned here was that offset values don’t necessarily need to be identical, as long as offset sync is enabled, which makes sure the topics have the correct position to read the data from.

We addressed this problem by using a custom tool to run tests on consumer groups, confirming that the translated offsets were either smaller or caught up, indicating synchronization as per MirrorMaker.

Challenge 2: Slow data migration

The migration process faced a bottleneck—data transfer was slower than anticipated, especially with a substantial 2 TB dataset. Despite a 20-node MirrorMaker cluster, the speed was insufficient.

To overcome this, the team strategically grouped MirrorMaker nodes based on unique port numbers. Clusters of five MirrorMaker nodes, each with a distinct port, significantly boosted throughput, allowing us to migrate data within hours instead of days.

Challenge 3: Lack of detailed process documentation

Navigating the uncharted territory of migrating large datasets using MirrorMaker highlighted the absence of detailed documentation for such scenarios.

Through trial and error, the team crafted an IaC module using Terraform. This module streamlined the entire cluster creation process with optimized settings, enabling a seamless start to the migration within minutes.

Final setup and next steps

As a result of the move to Amazon MSK, our final setup after topic migration looked like the following diagram.

We’re considering the following future improvements:

Conclusion.

In this post, we discussed how VMware Tanzu CloudHealth migrated their existing Amazon EC2-based Kafka infrastructure to Amazon MSK. We walked you through the new architecture, deployment and topic creation pipelines, improvements to observability and access control, topic migration challenges, and the issues we faced with the existing infrastructure, along with how and why we migrated to the new Amazon MSK setup. We also talked about all the advantages that Amazon MSK gave us, the final architecture we achieved with this migration, and lessons learned.

For us, the interplay of offset synchronization, strategic node grouping, and IaC proved pivotal in overcoming obstacles and ensuring a successful migration from Amazon EC2 Kafka to Amazon MSK. This post serves as a testament to the power of adaptability and innovation in migration challenges, offering insights for others navigating a similar path.

If you’re running self-managed Kafka on AWS, we encourage you to try the managed Kafka offering, Amazon MSK.

About the Authors

Rivlin Pereira is Staff DevOps Engineer at VMware Tanzu Division. He is very passionate about Kubernetes and works on CloudHealth Platform building and operating cloud solutions that are scalable, reliable and cost effective.

Vaibhav Pandey, a Staff Software Engineer at Broadcom, is a key contributor to the development of cloud computing solutions. Specializing in architecting and engineering data storage layers, he is passionate about building and scaling SaaS applications for optimal performance.

Raj Ramasubbu is a Senior Analytics Specialist Solutions Architect focused on big data and analytics and AI/ML with Amazon Web Services. He helps customers architect and build highly scalable, performant, and secure cloud-based solutions on AWS. Raj provided technical expertise and leadership in building data engineering, big data analytics, business intelligence, and data science solutions for over 18 years prior to joining AWS. He helped customers in various industry verticals like healthcare, medical devices, life science, retail, asset management, car insurance, residential REIT, agriculture, title insurance, supply chain, document management, and real estate.

Todd McGrath is a data streaming specialist at Amazon Web Services where he advises customers on their streaming strategies, integration, architecture, and solutions. On the personal side, he enjoys watching and supporting his 3 teenagers in their preferred activities as well as following his own pursuits such as fishing, pickleball, ice hockey, and happy hour with friends and family on pontoon boats. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

Satya Pattanaik is a Sr. Solutions Architect at AWS. He has been helping ISVs build scalable and resilient applications on AWS Cloud. Prior joining AWS, he played significant role in Enterprise segments with their growth and success. Outside of work, he spends time learning “how to cook a flavorful BBQ” and trying out new recipes.

• SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
• PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
• PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
• PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
• PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
• Source: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/how-vmware-tanzu-cloudhealth-migrated-from-self-managed-kafka-to-amazon-msk/