Zephyrnet Logo

40 years of useful biology

Date:

In Isaac Asimov’s Forward the Foundation, the great mathematician Hari Seldon attempts to get his granddaughter’s genome sequenced. He meets a biophysicist, who informs him that it is technically possible – but it will be exorbitantly expensive and the data will take weeks to analyze, in part due to the lack of high-quality human reference genomes.

Forward the Foundation is a science fiction novel that was written in the early 1990s and published in 1993, when at-will genome sequencing (at any price) was science fiction. Asimov’s understanding that Wanda Seldon’s genome would need to be compared against some standard to be practically useful was deeply insightful thirty years ago, nearly a decade before the first draft human genome was published [

1.

  • Venter J.C.
  • et al.
The sequence of the human genome.

] and long before ‘genome’ entered the popular lexicon.

But the Foundation novels are not near-term explorations of how real technologies might develop over the coming years or decades. They are set more than twenty thousand years in the future and are filled with fantastical notions of instantaneous interstellar communication, domed city-worlds accommodating tens of billions of people, and human-appearing robots based on positronic rather than electronic circuitry. These developments are no more realistic today than they were when Asimov was writing.

Biological technologies, on the other hand, have developed at a speed and intensity that not even the most accomplished science-fiction writers could have anticipated. The cost of sequencing a human genome has decreased by five orders of magnitude in the past twenty years (https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/DNA-Sequencing-Costs-Data). Around the same time that Asimov was finishing the Foundation series, the first patent for a 3D printer was issued [

2.

Masters, W.E. (1987) Computer automated manufacturing process and system. US Patent US4665492A

] and tissue engineering was thought of as a ’new field’ [

3.

  • Langer R.
  • Vacanti J.P.
Tissue Engineering.

]; today, dozens of bioprinting companies exist, the largest of which have reached billion-dollar market capitalization (https://3dprint.com/279455/cellink-can-this-bioprinting-firm-reach-10b-in-revenues/). And an article in the first issue of Trends in Biotechnology suggested tentatively that ‘it is possible to create new compositions of matter through biocatalysis’ [

4.

  • Neidleman S.L.
  • Geigert J.
The enzymatic synthesis of heterogeneous dihalide derivatives: a unique biocatalytic discovery.

]; forty years later, living organisms can be reprogrammed into factories that produce a spectacular array of new-to-nature metabolites [

5.

  • Haas R.
  • Nikel P.I.
Challenges and opportunities in bringing nonbiological atoms to life with synthetic metabolism.

].

Two things stand out about remarkable advances like these. The first is the dovetail between biological understanding and technological innovation, which is why it is so attractive to think about the scope of Trends in Biotechnology as ‘useful biology’. When J. Craig Venter and Daniel Cohen famously proclaimed the 21st century ‘the century of biology’, they introduced in equal terms the significance of understanding and manipulating genetics [

6.

  • Venter C.
  • Cohen D.
The 21st century: the century of biology.

]. Certainly, the multitude of recent advances in genome engineering, synthetic biology, and nucleic acid therapeutics would have been impossible without a fundamental understanding of genetics. Yet we could scarcely live in the century of biology if we had no means of using that fundamental understanding to promote human flourishing.

The second is the necessary interdisciplinarity in developing technologies from biology. Two of the last five Nobel Prize cycles have honored what are indisputably biotechnologies: directed evolution and phage display in 2018, and genome engineering in 2020. Both prizes were awarded in Chemistry, rather than Physiology or Medicine, despite the clear necessity of understanding (microbial) physiology to develop these technologies. mRNA vaccines are often predicted to be in line for a future Nobel, but one of the challenges in making the award may be deciding whether to recognize them as a therapeutic or as a biochemical innovation [

7.

  • Callaway E.
Why COVID vaccines didn’t win a science Nobel this year.

]. Biotechnology defies easy categorization as a ‘physical’ or a ‘life’ science; Trends in Biotechnology readers are equally likely to be computer scientists, physicians, plant biologists, or materials engineers.

In the spirit of that breadth and progress, I am delighted to share the 40th anniversary issue of Trends in Biotechnology. Ten years ago, then-editor Paige Shaklee threw a suitably festive 30th birthday party for the journal, reflecting on biotechnology ‘then and now’ in 1983 and 2013 [

8.

  • Shaklee P.M.
Celebrating 30 years of biotechnology.

]. This issue expands on that idea with two initiatives that discuss exciting applications of biology with deliberately equal views to the past and future.

First, a series of Spotlight articles examines the most influential biotechnology research articles of the past decade, on topics ranging from microbial production of artemisinin to delivery of RNA therapeutics and the genesis of the organ-on-a-chip field. Each of these Spotlights summarizes the research in a way that is accessible to non-experts, just like a standard Spotlight – and then uses the benefit of hindsight to comment on the influence that research has had on the field since it was published. And each was primarily written by an early-career researcher who we consider to be a ‘rising star’ in the field (although at least two have in the meantime become tenured professors).

Second, a series of longer articles by members of our advisory board and other more established leaders explores some of the most important topics in the field, and to our readers, over the past decade. These include biosensors, agricultural biotechnology, cell therapeutics, metabolic engineering, and more, and many of them incorporate a discussion of sustainability that has become an increasingly sharp focus for our community. We selected these topics based on quantitative metrics like article citations and downloads, observed interest in social and traditional media, and qualitative feedback like discussions with authors and readers, and I hope you will agree that they create a timely and representative cross-section of the biotechnology field.

While the relative importance of these topics might change over the next decade – and I have no doubt that new ones will add to the mix – I am optimistic that the same set of principles will continue to establish Trends in Biotechnology as one of the very best academic journals on its topic:

First, to be intentionally purpose-driven and focused on applications, without dismissing the importance of fundamental scientific understanding. Second, to emphasize that biotechnology is not solely therapeutics or pharmaceuticals and has a role to play in many sectors of sustainable human development, including health but also materials, energy, bulk and fine chemicals, and agriculture, to name just a few. Third, to have candid and unbiased conversations about non-scientific but important, and sometimes controversial, topics related to the implementation of biotechnologies, such as regulation, policy, ethics, intellectual property, and public perception. And fourth, to think beyond a purely academic audience and also engage authors, readers, and reviewers from government, industry, and NGOs.

I hope you will join me in celebrating this milestone for the journal. I can’t wait to learn about the exciting new uses for biology in the next ten years, the next forty years, and forward.

References

    • Venter J.C.
    • et al.

    The sequence of the human genome.

    Science. 2001; 291: 1304-1351

  1. Masters, W.E. (1987) Computer automated manufacturing process and system. US Patent US4665492A

    • Langer R.
    • Vacanti J.P.

    Tissue Engineering.

    Science. 1993; 260: 920-926

    • Neidleman S.L.
    • Geigert J.

    The enzymatic synthesis of heterogeneous dihalide derivatives: a unique biocatalytic discovery.

    Trends Biotechnol. 1983; 1: 21-25

    • Haas R.
    • Nikel P.I.

    Challenges and opportunities in bringing nonbiological atoms to life with synthetic metabolism.

    Trends Biotechnol. 2023; 41: 27-45

    • Venter C.
    • Cohen D.

    The 21st century: the century of biology.

    NPQ New Perspect. Q. 1997; 14: 26-31

    • Callaway E.

    Why COVID vaccines didn’t win a science Nobel this year.

    Nature. 2021; 598: 248

    • Shaklee P.M.

    Celebrating 30 years of biotechnology.

    Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 117

spot_img

VC Cafe

LifeSciVC

Latest Intelligence

VC Cafe

LifeSciVC

spot_img