• Flemming H.C.

Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019; 17: 247-260

• Falkowski P.G.

The role of phytoplankton photosynthesis in global biogeochemical cycles.

Photosynth. Res. 1994; 39: 235-258

• Demain A.L.

Microbial biotechnology.

Trends Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 26-31

• Desai S.H.
• Atsumi S.

Photosynthetic approaches to chemical biotechnology.

Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012; 24: 1031-1036

• Rosenberg J.N.
• et al.

A green light for engineered algae: redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution.

Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008; 19: 430-436

• Rizwan M.
• et al.

Exploring the potential of microalgae for new biotechnology applications and beyond: a review.

Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018; 92: 394-404

• Nguyen P.Q.
• et al.

Engineered living materials: prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials.

Adv. Mater. 2018; 30e1704847

• Huang J.
• et al.

Programmable and printable Bacillus subtilis biofilms as engineered living materials.

Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019; 15: 34-41

• Chen A.Y.
• et al.

Synthesis and patterning of tunable multiscale materials with engineered cells.

Nat. Mater. 2014; 13: 515-523

• Nguyen P.Q.
• et al.

Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres.

Nat. Commun. 2014; 5: 4945

• Duraj-Thatte A.M.
• et al.

Genetically programmable self-regenerating bacterial hydrogels.

Adv. Mater. 2019; 311901826

• Connell J.L.
• et al.

3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013; 110: 18380-18385

• Schaffner M.
• et al.

3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials.

Sci. Adv. 2017; 3eaao6804

• Dzobo K.
• et al.

Recent trends in decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for 3D printing: an updated review.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019; 18: 4628

• Kloxin A.M.
• et al.

Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties.

Science. 2009; 324: 59-63

• Ma X.
• et al.

Rapid 3D bioprinting of decellularized extracellular matrix with regionally varied mechanical properties and biomimetic microarchitecture.

Biomaterials. 2018; 185: 310-321

• Wangpraseurt D.
• et al.

Bionic 3D printed corals.

Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 1748

• Datta P.
• et al.

3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment.

NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2020; 4: 18

• Murphy S.V.
• Atala A.

3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Nat. Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 773-785

• Lode A.
• et al.

Green bioprinting: fabrication of photosynthetic algae-laden hydrogel scaffolds for biotechnological and medical applications.

Eng. Life Sci. 2015; 15: 177-183

• Yu C.
• et al.

Photopolymerizable biomaterials and light-based 3D printing strategies for biomedical applications.

Chem. Rev. 2020; 120: 10695-10743

• Zhao S.
• et al.

3D printing of functional microalgal silk structures for environmental applications.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019; 5: 4808-4816

• Unagolla J.M.
• Jayasuriya A.C.

Hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting: a comprehensive review on cell-laden hydrogels, bioink formulations, and future perspectives.

Appl. Mater. Today. 2020; 18100479

• Zhou L.
• et al.

A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020; 302000187

• Kim H.N.
• et al.

Patterning methods for polymers in cell and tissue engineering.

Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012; 40: 1339-1355

• Occhetta P.
• et al.

Fabrication of 3D cell-laden hydrogel microstructures through photo-mold patterning.

Biofabrication. 2013; 5035002

• Zhu W.
• et al.

3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016; 40: 103-112

• Hwang H.H.
• et al.

3D-printing of functional biomedical microdevices via light- and extrusion-based approaches.

Small Methods. 2018; 21700277

• Poomathi N.
• et al.

3D printing in tissue engineering: a state of the art review of technologies and biomaterials.

Rapid Prototyp. J. 2020; 26: 1313-1334

• Zhu W.
• et al.

Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits.

Mater. Today (Kidlington). 2018; 21: 951-959

• Tang M.
• et al.

Rapid 3D bioprinting of glioblastoma model mimicking native biophysical heterogeneity.

Small. 2021; 172006050

• Hwang H.H.
• et al.

High throughput direct 3D bioprinting in multiwell plates.

Biofabrication. 2021; 13025007

• Wang P.
• et al.

Controlled growth factor release in 3D-printed hydrogels.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020; 91900977

• Berry D.B.
• et al.

A 3D tissue-printing approach for validation of diffusion tensor imaging in skeletal muscle.

Tissue Eng. A. 2017; 23: 980-988

• Turner B.N.
• Gold S.A.

A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensi
onal accuracy, and surface roughness.

Rapid Prototyp. J. 2015; 21: 250-261

• Zein I.
• et al.

Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications.

Biomaterials. 2002; 23: 1169-1185

• Cohen D.L.
• et al.

Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries.

Tissue Eng. 2006; 12: 1325-1335

• Vaezi M.
• et al.

A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies.

Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013; 67: 1721-1754

• Zhang Z.
• et al.

Evaluation of bioink printability for bioprinting applications.

Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018; 5041304

• Zimmermann R.
• et al.

High resolution bioprinting of multi-component hydrogels.

Biofabrication. 2019; 11045008

• Zhao Z.
• et al.

Engineering materials with light: recent progress in digital light processing based 3D printing.

J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020; 8: 13896-13917

• You S.
• et al.

High-fidelity 3D printing using flashing photopolymerization.

Addit. Manuf. 2019; 30100834

• Tumbleston J.R.
• et al.

Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects.

Science. 2015; 347: 1349-1352

• You S.
• et al.

Mitigating scattering effects in light-based three-dimensional printing using machine learning.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2020; 1420811002

• Bagheri A.
• Jin J.

Photopolymerization in 3D printing.

ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019; 1: 593-611

• You S.
• et al.

Nanoscale 3D printing of hydrogels for cellular tissue engineering.

J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018; 6: 2187-2197

• You S.
• et al.

Microstereolithography.

in: Biofabrication and 3D tissue modeling. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019: 1-21

• You S.
• et al.

Projection printing of ultrathin structures with nanoscale thickness control.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019; 11: 16059-16064

• Ge Q.
• et al.

Projection micro stereolithography based 3D printing and its applications.

Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 2020; 2022004

• Rademakers T.
• et al.

Oxygen and nutrient delivery in tissue engineering: approaches to graft vascularization.

J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2019; 13: 1815-1829

• Chen H.
• et al.

Dissolved oxygen from microalgae-gel patch promotes chronic wound healing in diabetes.

Sci. Adv. 2020; 6eaba4311

• Cohen J.E.
• et al.

An innovative biologic system for photon-powered myocardium in the ischemic heart.

Sci. Adv. 2017; 3e1603078

• Qiao Y.
• et al.

Engineered algae: a novel oxygen-generating system for effective treatment of hypoxic cancer.

Sci. Adv. 2020; 6eaba5996

• Chávez M.N.
• et al.

Towards autotrophic tissue engineering: photosynthetic gene therapy for regeneration.

Biomaterials. 2016; 75: 25-36

• Hopfner U.
• et al.

Development of photosynthetic biomaterials for in vitro tissue engineering.

Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 2712-2717

• Centeno-Cerdas C.
• et al.

Development of photosynthetic sutures for the local delivery of oxygen and recombinant growth factors in wounds.

Acta Biomater. 2018; 81: 184-194

• Trampe E.
• et al.

Functionalized bioink with optical sensor nanoparticles for O₂ imaging in 3D-bioprinted constructs.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018; 281804411

• Maharjan S.
• et al.

Symbiotic photosynthetic oxygenation within 3D-bioprinted vascularized tissues.

Matter. 2021; 4: 217-240

• Haraguchi Y.
• et al.

Thicker three-dimensional tissue from a “symbiotic recycling system” combining mammalian cells and algae.

Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 41594

• Kolesky D.B.
• et al.

Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016; 113: 3179-3184

• Fields F.J.
• et al.

Effects of the microalgae Chlamydomonas on gastrointestinal health.

J. Funct. Foods. 2020; 65103738

• Champenois J.
• et al.

Review of the taxonomic revision of Chlorella and consequences for its food uses in Europe.

J. Appl. Phycol. 2015; 27: 1845-1851

• Akolpoglu M.B.
• et al.

High-yield production of biohybrid microalgae for on-demand cargo delivery.

Adv. Sci. (Weinh.). 2020; 72001256

• Koutra E.
• et al.

Bio-based products from microalgae cultivated in digestates.

Trends Biotechnol. 2018; 36: 819-833

• Barty-King C.H.
• et al.

Mechanochromic, structurally colored, and edible hydrogels prepared from hydroxypropyl cellulose and gelatin.

Adv. Mater. 2021; 332102112

• Guo J.
• et al.

Light-driven fine chemical production in yeast biohybrids.

Science. 2018; 362: 813-816

• Saha A.
• et al.

Additive manufacturing of catalytically active living materials.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018; 10: 13373-13380

• Johnston T.G.
• et al.

Compartmentalized microbes and co-cultures in hydrogels for on-demand bioproduction and preservation.

Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 563

• Ning E.
• et al.

3D bioprinting of mature bacterial biofilms for antimicrobial resistance drug testing.

Biofabrication. 2019; 11045018

Biodiesel from microalgae.

Biotechnol. Adv. 2007; 25
: 294-306

• Balzani V.
• et al.

Solar-driven chemistry: towards new catalytic solutions for a sustainable world.

Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 2019; 30: 443-452

• Tschörtner J.
• et al.

Biophotovoltaics: green power generation from sunlight and water.

Front. Microbiol. 2019; 10: 866

• Logan B.E.

Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009; 7: 375-381

• Sawa M.
• et al.

Electricity generation from digitally printed cyanobacteria.

Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 1327

• Grattieri M.
• et al.

Purple bacteria and 3D redox hydrogels for bioinspired photo-bioelectrocatalysis.

ChemSusChem. 2020; 13: 230-237

• Yoshida N.
• et al.

Graphene oxide-dependent growth and self-aggregation into a hydrogel complex of exoelectrogenic bacteria.

Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 21867

• Joshi S.
• et al.

Bacterial nanobionics via 3D printing.

Nano Lett. 2018; 18: 7448-7456

• Peralta-Yahya P.P.
• et al.

Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels.

Nature. 2012; 488: 320-328

• Liu Y.
• et al.

Biofuels for a sustainable future.

Cell. 2021; 184: 1636-1647

• Wang M.
• et al.

Biomass-derived aviation fuels: challenges and perspective.

Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2019; 74: 31-49

• Lee S.Y.
• et al.

A comprehensive metabolic map for production of bio-based chemicals.

Nat. Catal. 2019; 2: 18-33

• Brodersen K.E.
• et al.

Radiative energy budget reveals high photosynthetic efficiency in symbiont-bearing corals.

J. R. Soc. Interface. 2014; 1120130997

• Wangpraseurt D.
• et al.

Microscale light management and inherent optical properties of intact corals studied with optical coherence tomography.

J. R. Soc. Interface. 2019; 1620180567

• Martin N.
• et al.

Synthetic algal–bacteria consortia for space-efficient microalgal growth in a simple hydrogel system.

J. Appl. Phycol. 2021; 33: 2805-2815

• Tantimongcolwat T.
• et al.

Polyacrylamide hydrogel encapsulated E. coli expressing metal-sensing green fluorescent protein as a potential tool for copper ion determination.

EXCLI J. 2014; 13: 401-415

• Rivera-Tarazona L.K.
• et al.

Stimuli-responsive engineered living materials.

Soft Matter. 2021; 17: 785-809

• Justus K.B.
• et al.

A biosensing soft robot: autonomous parsing of chemical signals through integrated organic and inorganic interfaces.

Sci. Robot. 2019; 4eaax0765

• Appiah C.
• et al.

Living materials herald a new era in soft robotics.

Adv. Mater. 2019; 311807747

• Pataranutaporn P.
• et al.

Living bits: opportunities and challenges for integrating living microorganisms in human-computer interaction.

in: AHs ’20: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 1-12

• Chen X.
• et al.

Bacillus spores as building blocks for stimuli-responsive materials and nanogenerators.

Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014; 9: 137-141

• Liu X.
• et al.

3D Printing of living responsive materials and devices.

Adv. Mater. 2018; 301704821

• Liu X.
• et al.

Stretchable living materials and devices with hydrogel–elastomer hybrids hosting programmed cells.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017; 114: 2200-2205

• Smith R.S.H.
• et al.

Hybrid living materials: digital design and fabrication of 3D multimaterial structures with programmable biohybrid surfaces.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020; 301907401

• Singh A.V.
• et al.

Microemulsion-based soft bacteria-driven microswimmers for active cargo delivery.

ACS Nano. 2017; 11: 9759-9769

• Yin K.
• et al.

Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals.

Chem. Eng. J. 2019; 360: 1553-1563

• Henriques B.
• et al.

A macroalgae-based biotechnology for water remediation: simultaneous removal of Cd, Pb and Hg by living Ulva lactuca.

J. Environ. Manag. 2017; 191: 275-289

• Das K.
• Mukherjee A.K.

Crude petroleum-oil biodegradation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a petroleum-oil contaminated soil from North-East India.

Bioresour. Technol. 2007; 98: 1339-1345

• Hawari J.
• et al.

Microbial degradation of explosives: biotransformation versus mineralization.

Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000; 54: 605-618

• Nazir M.S.
• et al.

Remediation of pesticide in water.

Sustain. Agric. Rev. 2021; 47: 271-307

• Delneuville C.
• et al.

J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2019; 89: 244-254

• Yu F.
• et al.

3D printed self-driven thumb-sized motors for in-situ underwater pollutant remediation.

Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 41169

• Wang Y.
• et al.

Cost-effective domestic wastewater treatment and bioenergy recovery in an immobilized microalgal-based photoautotrophic microbial fuel cell (PMFC).

Chem. Eng. J. 2019; 372: 956-965

• Kalossaka L.M.
• et al.

Review: 3D printing hydrogels for the fabrication of soilless cultivation substrates.

Appl. Mater. Today. 2021; 24101088

• Wang J.Y.
• et a
  l.

Application of hydrogel encapsulated carbonate precipitating bacteria for approaching a realistic self-healing in concrete.

Constr. Build. Mater. 2014; 68: 110-119

• Perez J.J.
• et al.

A novel, green, low-cost chitosan–starch hydrogel as potential delivery system for plant growth-promoting bacteria.

Carbohydr. Polym. 2018; 202: 409-417

• Wang J.
• et al.

Application of modified-alginate encapsulated carbonate producing bacteria in concrete: a promising strategy for crack self-healing.

Front. Microbiol. 2015; 6: 1088

• Palin D.
• et al.

A bacteria-based self-healing cementitious composite for application in low-temperature marine environments.

Biomimetics. 2017; 2: 13

• Wang J.
• et al.

A chitosan based pH-responsive hydrogel for encapsulation of bacteria for self-sealing concrete.

Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018; 93: 309-322

• Malik S.
• et al.

Robotic extrusion of algae-laden hydrogels for large-scale applications.

Glob. Chall. 2020; 41900064

• Hughes T.P.
• et al.

Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene.

Science. 2018; 359: 80-83

• Hoegh-Guldberg O.
• et al.

Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification.

Science. 2007; 318: 1737-1742

• Harris D.L.
• et al.

Coral reef structural complexity provides important coastal protection from waves under rising sea levels.

Sci. Adv. 2018; 4eaao4350

• Putnam H.M.

Avenues of reef-building coral acclimatization in response to rapid environmental change.

J. Exp. Biol. 2021; 224jeb239319

• van Oppen M.J.H.
• et al.

Building coral reef resilience through assisted evolution.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015; 112: 2307-2313

• Albalawi H.I.
• et al.

Sustainable and eco-friendly coral restoration through 3D printing and fabrication.

ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021; 9: 12634-12645

• Sneed J.M.
• et al.

The chemical cue tetrabromopyrrole from a biofilm bacterium induces settlement of multiple Caribbean corals.

Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014; 28120133086

• Amorim C.G.
• et al.

3D printing technology in the environment.

Springer, 2021: 131-160

• Pickering H.
• et al.

Artificial reefs as a tool to aid rehabilitation of coastal ecosystems: investigating the potential.

Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999; 37: 505-514

• Mohammed J.S.

Applications of 3D printing technologies in oceanography.

Methods Oceanogr. 2016; 17: 97-117

• Riera E.
• et al.

Biofilm monitoring as a tool to assess the efficiency of artificial reefs as substrates: toward 3D printed reefs.

Ecol. Eng. 2018; 120: 230-237

• Dubbin K.
• et al.

Projection microstereolithographic
microbial bioprinting for engineered biofilms.

Nano Lett. 2021; 21: 1352-1359

• Lee H.R.
• et al.

Immobilization of planktonic algal spores by inkjet printing.

Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 12357

• Balasubramanian S.
• et al.

3D printing for the fabrication of biofilm-based functional living materials.

ACS Synth. Biol. 2019; 8: 1564-1567

• Lehner B.A.E.
• et al.

A straightforward approach for 3D bacterial printing.

ACS Synth. Biol. 2017; 6: 1124-1130

• Qian F.
• et al.

Direct writing of tunable living inks for bioprocess intensification.

Nano Lett. 2019; 19: 5829-5835