Connect with us


Oculus Quest 2 Review – The Best Standalone Headset Gets Better in (Almost) Every Way




When Quest first launched in 2019, we called it the “first great standalone VR headset,” owing to it being a truly complete package between hardware, software, and content. And over the course of its life, we saw Quest improve over time with software updates that added new features and improved existing ones. And now we have Quest 2, which is pretty much the same headset, just better in (almost) every way.

Quest 2 is (just about) here! Facebook announced the headset and opened pre-orders today starting at $300. Oculus Quest 2 has a release date of October 13th.

But before owners of the original Quest look at their old headset with disdain, consider this. Quest 2 might be better in (almost) every way, but it really doesn’t do anything new. Quest 2 has effectively zero new features compared to the original, and Oculus says both headsets will share the same game library.

A quandary then… would Quest 2 have been better called ‘Quest S‘? Well yes, but also… no. As you’ll find throughout our review, a good chunk of Quest 2’s potential has not yet been unlocked. Similar to the original, Quest 2 will see improvements over time. In that sense, I think it would be fair to call it Quest S on day one, but once Oculus delivers some promised post-launch improvements, it’ll earn the name Quest 2.

Oculus Quest 2 vs. Quest Specs

Photo by Road to VR

Before we dive into the full review, here’s a breakdown of Quest 2 compared to Quest official specs:

Quest 2 Quest
Resolution (per-eye) 1,832 × 1,920 (LCD)

1,440 × 1,600 (OLED)

Refresh Rate 90Hz 72Hz
Processor Snapdragon XR2

Snapdragon 835

Battery Life 2–3 hours 2–3 hours
Controller Battery Life 4x original
Field of View Equal Equal
IPD Adjust 58mm, 63mm, 68mm 58–72mm
Weight 503g 571g
Storage 64GB or 256GB 64GB or 128GB
Strap Soft (rigid sold separately) Rigid

Now onto the full review… if you want to summary without the detail, skip to the very end for our conclusion.


Photo by Road to VR

One of the most exciting but as of yet untapped bits of hardware in Quest 2 is the processor. While the original Quest launched with a dated (even at the time) Snapdragon 835, Oculus effectively picked the highest-end processor they could for Quest 2, the Snapdragon XR2. Not only is it significantly more powerful, it’s also a made-for-VR chip which includes some additional features that make it even better for use in a VR headset.

But it’s going to take some time until we see the XR2 really shining in Quest 2. On day one, Oculus says that Quest 2 will run have an ‘experimental’ 90Hz option which will run the headset’s main menu at that refresh rate. Games, however, will continue to run at 72Hz.

“Soon” after launch, according to Oculus, the company will make the 90Hz mode default for the main menu and also allow developers to take advantage of the extra refresh rate, but that may well require per-app updates.

The same thing applies to Oculus Link. On day one, if you plug Quest 2 into your PC to use Link, your PC VR content will run at 72Hz and have the same encoding quality as original Quest. “Soon” after launch, Oculus says, Quest 2 will be able to use Link at 90Hz and higher quality.

So it’s going to take some time before we see the full power of Quest 2.

The good news is that most games can automatically take advantage of Quest 2’s higher resolution, so that’s one benefit that you’ll see right out of the gate, and it’s a big one.

Display & Lenses

Photo by Road to VR

The leap in resolution and framerate are among Quest 2’s most meaningful improvements. Quest 2 has a per-eye resolution of 1,832 × 1,920 (3.5 megapixels) compared to the original’s 1,440 × 1,600 (2.3 megapixels). That’s a nice jump already, but there’s a bit of an extra boost because Quest 2’s LCD display has more sub-pixels—which fill in the ‘screen door effect’ even more—than Quest’s OLED display. On Quest 2, the screen door effect is basically invisible.

Pixels are too small to be seen individually; you can still see evidence of the underlying pixel structure against flat colors, but it fades away against anything textured.

The resolution difference is noticeable right away. Between the extra sharpness and the smoother motion of the 90Hz display, stepping up to the menu in Quest 2 feels a bit more real than with the original Quest.

As some know, the move from OLED to LCD comes with some downsides too. Most notably that LCD can’t get close to the deep blacks that OLED can. Although it doesn’t have those deep blacks of the original, it also has massively reduced smearing which is arguably a worthwhile tradeoff because higher resolution doesn’t mean much if you can’t keep pixels from smearing often.

Quest 2’s lenses are effectively the same as the original. They’re fresnel as before, and have the same issues with ‘god rays’ as any modern fresnel lens (that is: annoying god rays on high contrast elements, but generally not to bothersome in most scenes). Oculus declined to share Quest 2’s official field of view, but said it is equivalent to the original Quest (that is: enough to be immersive, but more would still be nice). The ‘sweet spot’ or clarity across the lens, is roughly the same as the original Quest.

Quest 2’s lenses and display are tuned well. Chromatic aberration, pupil swim, and smearing are effectively invisible. Mura is almost invisible as well, but it’ll show up faintly against certain flat colors if you go looking for it.


Photo by Road to VR

Quest 2’s IPD can be physically adjusted between three positions: 58mm, 63mm, and 68mm. Rather than a slider on the bottom of the headset which allows you to adjust the IPD while looking through the lenses, to change the IPD on Quest 2 you need to remove the headset and grasp both lenses and tug them into one of the other positions.

Because of the delineated IPD adjustment, even if you’re within the minimum and maximum range, you could be up to 2.5mm out of the ‘ideal’ lens alignment (if you were to fall exactly between the available positions). We can infer that if Oculus felt being up to 2.5mm out of alignment was ok in the middle of the range, it would also be ok on the ends of the range—giving Quest 2 a ‘maximum recommended’ IPD range from 55.5mm to 70.5mm, which is pretty close to the original Quest’s ‘maximum recommended’ range of 56 to 74mm.

Since my IPD is roughly 63mm, I wouldn’t be able to see what the image looks like if it were 2.5mm off center (not with any reasonable precision, anyway). We’ll have to wait for more widespread feedback to know if falling between the three positions hampers the visual experience much, or if Quest 2’s eye-box is large enough to accommodate (clearly, Oculus felt this to be the case).

However, if you use the widest IPD setting you may see a bit of clipping of the field of view (this is a result of the single display design in which the lenses move closer to the edges of the display when adjusting for IPD).


Quest 2, like its predecessor, has hidden integrated speakers that allow audio to emanate from the headband. Even though the speaker openings are a bit closer, they’re still miles away from being centrally aligned with the ear, which makes them sub-par for accurate spatial audio.

In terms of sound quality and volume, Quest 2’s speakers feel right in line with Quest. Meaning the audio is passable, but a far cry from from the quality you’d hear from something like Index or even the original Rift CV1. For anyone coming from a Rift S at least, you’ll be happy to know that Quest 2’s audio is louder and of better quality.

Many games will do fine with Quest 2’s build in audio, but for games with especially good sound tech and design, you’ll miss out on a lot of added immersion without a better audio solution.

Although it’s a bummer to have to fumble with headphones to get that maximum immersion from Quest, at least the option to add your own audio is available thanks to the single 3.5mm audio input on the side (unlike original Quest, there’s only one 3.5mm audio input on Quest 2).

Design & Ergonomics

Photo by Road to VR

Quest 2’s design isn’t fundamentally different than its predecessor, but it does bring a number of refinements. In terms of size and weight, it’s a bit smaller and a bit lighter.

Quest 2 manages to look slightly less bulbous, if a bit less premium due to the all-plastic finish versus the fabric finish of the original.

The minimal button and port layous are all effectively identical: a volume rocker on the bottom, USB-C charging & data port on the left next to a 3.5mm audio input, and a power button and LED power indicator on the right.

Soft Strap & Elite Strap

Photo by Road to VR

The biggest change to the design is the head strap. Out of the box you’ll get a soft strap which is, at least for my head, a bit of a downgrade over the original Quest’s rigid strap. Rigid straps have the benefit of gripping the back of your head and lifting weight off the front of your head via support from the top and side straps. Soft straps without any structure can’t do this nearly as well because they can only really support the front of the headset via the top strap and can’t grip the back of the head as well without a vice-like tightness. When I use the soft strap I find that there’s more pressure than I’d like on my forehead.

Now, this would be a bummer if not for the fact that Oculus is, finally, offering first-party ergonomic accessories, including an Elite Strap ($50) and an Elite Battery Strap ($80), both of which are rigid and specifically designed with a counterweight (fingers crossed for an an Elite Audio Strap in the future).

Quest 2 with Elite Strap | Photo by Road to VR

The good news is that the Elite Strap design is excellent—I’d say Oculus’ best headstrap yet—which makes me really wish they just included it by default. It seems pretty clear that not doing so was largely a cost-saving decision.

For most serious VR users, I’m just going to go ahead and recommend you get the Elite Strap or the Elite Battery Strap on day one. Yes, it’s at least another $50 on top of the $300 base price, but it’s worth it.

Fit Pack

On top of the Elite Strap options, Oculus is also going to be selling a ‘Fit Pack’ ($40) which will include light blockers that fit around the lenses (to cover any light coming from the nose cavity) as well as two different face pads to accommodate wider or narrower faces. I haven’t had my hands on the Fit Pack, but found that the included face pad worked fine for me and I wasn’t bothered by any light leakage. It’s great that these accessories will be available though so a wider range of people can find an ergonomic fit that works for them.

Quest 2 also comes with a glasses spacer which holds the lenses a little further from your eyes so that there’s room for glasses in between. The face pad is slightly less wide than the original Quest, so especially wide frames might be problematic.


Photo by Road to VR

At first glance, Quest 2’s controllers might not look much different than the original Quest controllers, but they’ve actually seen a significant ergonomic redesign—or perhaps more of an ergonomic throwback. The ‘new’ controller design is very close to the Touch controllers of the original Rift CV1 headset. And that’s a great thing because they arguably had the best ergonomics of any VR controller to date.

Quest 2 controller (left), Quest controller (right) | Photo by Road to VR

Compared to the Quest controllers, Quest 2’s controllers are larger and feature a much larger, and offset ‘face’ which provides a natural area to rest your thumb without resting them on a button. The handle shape seems to fit into the hand a bit more purposefully too. The Quest 2 controllers are actually a bit larger than the original Rift CV1 controllers as well. For me that makes them slightly larger than ideal (but those with larger hands will surely feel the opposite). Even still, I think the ergonomic shift back toward the Rift CV1 controllers is a nice improvement.

Rift CV1 controller (left), Quest 2 controller (right) | Photo by Road to VR

And there’s another benefit hiding inside. The Quest 2 haptics are notably more powerful than their predecessors. We don’t yet know if they’re capable of some of the advanced haptic effects seen on the Rift CV1 controllers, but we expect to learn more about this soon.

Quest 2’s controllers are also now more power efficient and last up to four times longer than the original Quest controllers, according to Oculus. We’ll need to follow up on that claim because our controller batteries have yet to run out!

Unfortunately Oculus has confirmed that Quest 2 controllers are not compatible with Quest or Rift S.

IPD Adjustment

I already talked about the IPD adjustment up in the hardware section, but there’s a design element that needs to be talked about as well.

I’m glad Quest 2 has an IPD adjustment, even if it can only be moved between three discrete settings (58mm, 63mm, and 68mm). However, the approach is a bit baffling. Rather than a slider on the bottom of the headset which allows you to look at the image as you adjust the IPD, on Quest 2 you need to remove the headset, grab the lenses, push them into one of the other positions, and then put the headset back on.

Given that the different settings are simply labeled 1, 2, and 3—and that there’s seemingly no guidance for the user about which position they should select—I don’t see how users are expected to set their IPD correctly. Even if you could do it by sight, the need to remove the headset, change the lens position, then put it back on means you can’t look at the image as you adjust it, which makes it far harder to set by sight. And even if you’re a VR enthusiast and actually know your own IPD measurement, you have to remember which numbered setting corresponds with which measurement.

Unless I’m missing something, this is a strange approach to IPD adjustment and one which I doubt will result in the majority of users using the correct setting.

Continue on Page 2: Tracking & Experience »



Someone Remade ‘Among Us’ in VR and It’s Strangely More Fun Than the Original




Thought playing the unofficial Fall Guys remake in VR was fun? Now you can sample some of the traitorous mayhem in the hit social game Among Us (2018) in VR too—and it’s strangely more fun than the original in a few ways.

If you’ve never played Among Us, here’s the jist: it’s an online social party game that puts you and up to 10 players on a space station. Among you is a single imposter who kills crewmates and causes all sorts of havoc as the regular crew goes about completing tasks aboard the ship. Crew members can call emergency meetings, and vote for a suspected imposter, who is then summarily executed by airlock ejection.

Just like in the unofficial Fall Guys remake, someone used Rec Room’s room-creation tools to basically recreate Among Us, and it’s really surprising how well the social game works in VR.

YouTuber ‘HairyManLegs’ captured a few rounds, showing off just how cool the game is in VR, replete with face-to-face emergency meetings, interactive tasks designed for VR, and physically stabbing other crew members as the imposter. The full video is definitely worth a watch as a primer for the fun:

Granted, the VR remake is missing out on a few of the things that make the official 2D game truly great—the silly cartoon deaths, fun outfits, and gameplay elements like a reduced field of view when the lights are off, which adds a serious element of surprise when there’s someone lurking in the dark, just waiting to trap you in a room to kill you.

The VR version certainly isn’t perfect, as you’ll have to assemble a crew of players with basically whoever’s around at the moment, which even on the bustling Rec Room platform can be difficult, making it less of a casual drop-in game and more of an activity you have to plan. When the stars align though and you can get a good number of players, be it friends or friendly randos, it really shows that Among Us would make a pretty awesome VR game if the creators, Innersloth, were so inclined to bring it to VR.

If you want to play the Among Us recreation, head over to Rec Room (available on SteamVR, Oculus Quest, and PSVR) and search for ‘Among Us RR’ in the community rooms section.


Continue Reading


Virtual Tours: The Key to a Successful School Marketing Plan




While the coronavirus moving education world almost entirely online, schools and colleges alike are finding themselves having to continuously adjust to the ever-changing landscape. As technologies develop, virtual tours are likely to become more interactive, and educational institutions must be sure to take full advantage of this. Virtual tours have become a promising alternative to traditional recruitment activities that can entice new students to enrol, wherever they may be.

In a virtual tour, prospective students experience your school’s culture and campus through videos and other media on your website. For example, an interactive map can link to different areas on campus, with additional information and visuals about each location. You can also create video tours with narration and other audio effects.

Get tremendous value with virtual tours.

While many can’t travel to campuses and schools at the moment, educational institutions are opting for virtual tours to improve their marketing campaigns. Prospective students are more likely to feel connected to your school when they view a video of the buildings and campus rather than photos. An engaging virtual tour allows students to interact with your website and increase your organic traffic.

1. How to use subtle AR filters to survive your Zoom meetings?

2. The First No-Headset Virtual Monitor

3. Augmented reality (AR) is the future of Restaurant Menu?

4. Creating remote MR productions

A key selling to many local and international students when considering which school to attend are the facilities that the institution has to offer. What are the sports facilities like? How about performing arts? Do they have large communal areas? How are the science and engineering lecture theatres laid out? 3D virtual tours give potential students the opportunity to experience your space in a truly immersive fashion.

When students are making an enrolment decision, small details matter. Sharing unique, memorable aspects of your campus through a virtual tour can help increase your registration number. 77% of education seekers will first visit a school’s website at least two weeks — and often two months — before taking action, according to the Google and Compete study. If you want your prospects to remember your school, consider incorporating a virtual tour on your website. In fact, you can try a range of gamification options that will leave students with a lasting impression.

Creating a virtual tour is not only beneficial for now, but it’s also a new system that will serve you in years to come, even after life returns to normal. Students who live far from the campus will appreciate the ease of being able to familiarise themselves with the facilities and grounds, without the inconvenience of travel and saving both time and money.

360° virtual tours are as varied as the schools they promote. And Silversea Media can help you create customised tours that highlight the best aspects of your school, staff, community and location. From the initial consultation, through image capture and filming to completion and hosting, our team will make the production of your school tour easy.

Explore our virtual campus tour solutions:

Find out more about producing a 360° virtual tour for your school at no cost here.


Continue Reading


Benefits & Use Cases of Augmented and Virtual Reality in Education




Skywell Software

1. How to use subtle AR filters to survive your Zoom meetings?

2. The First No-Headset Virtual Monitor

3. Augmented reality (AR) is the future of Restaurant Menu?

4. Creating remote MR productions


Continue Reading
Nano Technology2 hours ago

Physicists make electrical nanolasers even smaller

Nano Technology2 hours ago

Nano-microscope gives first direct observation of the magnetic properties of 2D materials: Discovery means new class of materials and technologies

Nano Technology2 hours ago

Who stole the light? Self-induced ultrafast demagnetization limits the amount of light diffracted from magnetic samples at soft x-ray energies

Blockchain2 hours ago

Brace for it – Bitcoin Futures may be nearing a tipping point

Blockchain3 hours ago

Tron, Synthetix, VeChain Price Analysis: 19 September

AR/VR6 hours ago

Someone Remade ‘Among Us’ in VR and It’s Strangely More Fun Than the Original

AR/VR6 hours ago

Virtual Tours: The Key to a Successful School Marketing Plan

Crowdfunding8 hours ago

Spanish Financial Giant BBVA’s US Division Recognized as one of the Best Corporate Digital Banks in North America

Gaming11 hours ago

Evening Reading – September 18, 2020

AI11 hours ago

7 Awe Inspiring AI Techs That Transformed The Digital World

Entrepreneur12 hours ago

100X.VC Unveils Its Class 02 Investments

Payments12 hours ago

Here’s how Nasdaq-listed MicroStrategy went about buying $175m in Bitcoin

Esports12 hours ago

Lenovo Legion Sponsors G2 Esports as Hardware Partner

CNBC12 hours ago

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies at age 87

Energy13 hours ago

Shanghai Electric Showcases Smart Energy Solution at China International Industrial Expo on World’s Clean Up Day

Entrepreneur14 hours ago

Preventive Healthcare Market Dilating in India

Cannabis14 hours ago

5 weed products Tommy Chong can’t live without

Gaming14 hours ago

Shacknews Twitch Highlights: Rocket League, Fight Crab, and Quest 64

Entrepreneur15 hours ago

More gets 275 Crore INR From Amazon, Samara Capital

Big Data15 hours ago

TikTok filed a complaint against Trump administration to block U.S. ban: Bloomberg News

Blockchain16 hours ago

Seoul Police Summons Bithumb Chairman For Interrogation

Cyber Security17 hours ago

6 Crucial password security tips for everyone

CNBC17 hours ago

‘Thank you, RBG’: Leaders react with sadness, shock to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death

Gaming17 hours ago

Shack Chat: What’s your reaction to the September PlayStation 5 Showcase?

Cleantech17 hours ago

Ford Mustang Mach-E Easily Goes 300+ Miles In Norway

Gaming17 hours ago

Apple and Sony Events – The TouchArcade Show #462

Esports17 hours ago

Here’s the schedule for the 2020 League of Legends World Championship

Gaming17 hours ago

Weekend PC Download Deals for Sept. 18: Steam Pirate Sale

Gaming17 hours ago

Shacknews Dump – September 18, 2020

Crowdfunding18 hours ago

India-Based Insurtech ACKO Secures $60 Million Through Latest Funding Round Led By Munich Re Ventures

Crowdfunding18 hours ago

Google Temporarily Removes Paytm Mobile App from Play Store Due to Supposedly Being in Violation For Gambling

Gaming18 hours ago

TouchArcade Game of the Week: ‘Songbringer’

CNBC18 hours ago

In Photos: Crowd gathers in front of the Supreme Court to mourn Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

CoinTelegraph18 hours ago

Pinned below $11K, Bitcoin price plays second fiddle to Uniswap (UNI)

CNBC19 hours ago

Trump nominee to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Supreme Court will get Senate vote, McConnell says

Cleantech20 hours ago

Indian Government May Put EV Chargers At 69,000 Gas Pumps

Blockchain20 hours ago

The Last Time This On-Chain Metric Was This Low, Bitcoin Surged 150%

Crowdfunding20 hours ago

Digital Transformation: Qatar Financial Center Regulatory Authority to Migrate Online Services to Microsoft Cloud

Gaming21 hours ago

Call of Duty Cold War VS. Modern Warfare: The Biggest Differences

Gaming21 hours ago

What The Hell Happened To Splinter Cell