1Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
We study bosonic quantum computations using the Segal-Bargmann representation of quantum states. We argue that this holomorphic representation is a natural one which not only gives a canonical description of bosonic quantum computing using basic elements of complex analysis but also provides a unifying picture which delineates the boundary between discrete- and continuous-variable quantum information theory. Using this representation, we show that the evolution of a single bosonic mode under a Gaussian Hamiltonian can be described as an integrable dynamical system of classical Calogero-Moser particles corresponding to the zeros of the holomorphic function, together with a conformal evolution of Gaussian parameters. We explain that the Calogero-Moser dynamics is due to unique features of bosonic Hilbert spaces such as squeezing. We then generalize the properties of this holomorphic representation to the multimode case, deriving a non-Gaussian hierarchy of quantum states and relating entanglement to factorization properties of holomorphic functions. Finally, we apply this formalism to discrete- and continuous- variable quantum measurements and obtain a classification of subuniversal models that are generalizations of Boson Sampling and Gaussian quantum computing.
Featured image: Abstract depiction of the holomorphic representation of a quantum state. States are described by the zeros of their holomorphic representation, which in turn can be seen as classical particles.
[embedded content]
Popular summary
Quantum information processing with discrete variables is a well studied field and has been defined as the backbone of the standard model of quantum computing. However, continuous variable quantum information has attracted increasing interest in recent years due to its appealing features in terms of bosonic quantum error correction, efficient measurements, and large entanglement generation.
Although discrete and continuous variable quantum models appear to be qualitatively incomparable, they share remarkable similarities. These distinct differences and similarities motivate the need for a representation of quantum mechanics which puts discrete and continuous models of quantum computing on equal footing and delineates the boundary between them.
In our work, we present such a unifying formalism, in which quantum states are represented by analytic functions. Discrete representations are given by polynomials whereas continuous ones are given by holomorphic functions. Using this representation, we generalise the so-called stellar representation of non-Gaussian states, we show that a large class continuous variable quantum dynamics can be represented elegantly using trajectories of classical particles, and we provide a classification of continuous variable quantum computing models based on their complexity.
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] P. W. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring,” in Proceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pp. 124–134, IEEE. 1994.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700
[2] A. W. Harrow and A. Montanaro, “Quantum computational supremacy,” Nature 549, 203–209 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458
[3] S. Wiesner, “Conjugate coding,” ACM Sigact News 15, 78–88 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1008908.1008920
[4] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Physical Review Letters 70, 1895 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895
[5] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit,” Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149
[6] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition,”. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 10th ed., 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1463744
[7] S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513–577 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513
[8] G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, “Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond,” Open Systems & Information Dynamics 21, 1440001 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1230161214400010
[9] D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, “Encoding a qubit in an oscillator,” Physical Review A 64, 012310 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310
[10] W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, “Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits,” Fundamental Research 50–67 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2020.12.006
[11] H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, “Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency,” Physical Review Letters 117, 110801 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.110801
[12] S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S. C. Armstrong, C. Sornphiphatphong, T. Kaji, S. Suzuki, J.-i. Yoshikawa, H. Yonezawa, N. C. Menicucci, and A. Furusawa, “Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain,” Nature Photonics 7, 982 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.287
[13] S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, “The computational Complexity of Linear Optics,” Theory of Computing 9, 143 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1993636.1993682
[14] A. P. Lund, A. Laing, S. Rahimi-Keshari, T. Rudolph, J. L. O’Brien, and T. C. Ralph, “Boson Sampling from a Gaussian State,” Physical Review Letters 113, 100502 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502
[15] C. S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni, S. Barkhofen, C. Silberhorn, and I. Jex, “Gaussian boson sampling,” Physical Review Letters 119, 170501 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.170501
[16] T. Douce, D. Markham, E. Kashefi, E. Diamanti, T. Coudreau, P. Milman, P. van Loock, and G. Ferrini, “Continuous-Variable Instantaneous Quantum Computing is hard to sample,” Physical Review Letters 118, 070503 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.070503
[17] A. P. Lund, S. Rahimi-Keshari, and T. C. Ralph, “Exact Boson Sampling using Gaussian continuous variable measurements,” Physical Review A 96, 022301 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022301
[18] L. Chakhmakhchyan and N. J. Cerf, “Boson sampling with Gaussian measurements,” Physical Review A 96, 032326 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032326
[19] U. Chabaud, T. Douce, D. Markham, P. Van Loock, E. Kashefi, and G. Ferrini, “Continuous-variable sampling from photon-added or photon-subtracted squeezed states,” Physical Review A 96, 062307 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062307
[20] H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, et al., “Quantum computational advantage using photons,” Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770
[21] F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
[22] J. K. Horner and J. F. Symons, “What Have Google’s Random Quantum Circuit Simulation Experiments Demonstrated about Quantum Supremacy?,” in Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning, pp. 411–419. Springer, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70873-3_29
[23] F. Pan and P. Zhang, “Simulating the Sycamore quantum supremacy circuits,” arXiv:2103.03074.
arXiv:arXiv:2103.03074
[24] B. Villalonga, M. Y. Niu, L. Li, H. Neven, J. C. Platt, V. N. Smelyanskiy, and S. Boixo, “Efficient approximation of experimental Gaussian boson sampling,” arXiv:2109.11525.
arXiv:arXiv:2109.11525
[25] Y. Tong, V. V. Albert, J. R. McClean, J. Preskill, and Y. Su, “Provably accurate simulation of gauge theories and bosonic systems,” arXiv:2110.06942.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-09-22-816
arXiv:arXiv:2110.06942
[26] S. Lloyd and S. L. Braunstein, “Quantum computation over continuous variables,” in Quantum Information with Continuous Variables, pp. 9–17. Springer, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1258-9_2
[27] S. D. Bartlett, B. C. Sanders, S. L. Braunstein, and K. Nemoto, “Efficient Classical Simulation of Continuous Variable Quantum Information Processes,” Physical Review Letters 88, 097904 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.097904
[28] R. Takagi and Q. Zhuang, “Convex resource theory of non-Gaussianity,” Physical Review A 97, 062337 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062337
[29] Q. Zhuang, P. W. Shor, and J. H. Shapiro, “Resource theory of non-Gaussian operations,” Physical Review A 97, 052317 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.052317
[30] F. Albarelli, M. G. Genoni, M. G. Paris, and A. Ferraro, “Resource theory of quantum non-Gaussianity and Wigner negativity,” Physical Review A 98, 052350 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052350
[31] J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, “Distilling Gaussian states with Gaussian operations is impossible,” Physical Review Letters 89, 137903 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137903
[32] J. Fiurášek, “Gaussian transformations and distillation of entangled Gaussian states,” Physical Review Letters 89, 137904 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137904
[33] J. Niset, J. Fiurášek, and N. J. Cerf, “No-go theorem for Gaussian quantum error correction,” Physical Review Letters 102, 120501 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.120501
[34] J. B. Conway, “Functions of one complex variable II,”, vol. 159. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0817-4
[35] F. Calogero, “Solution of the one-dimensional N-body problems with quadratic and/or inversely quadratic pair potentials,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 419–436 (1971).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665604
[36] J. Radcliffe, “Some properties of coherent spin states,” Journal of Physics A: General Physics 4, 313 (1971).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/4/3/009
[37] F. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, “Atomic coherent states in quantum optics,” Physical Review A 6, 2211 (1972).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.6.2211
[38] D. Gross, “Hudson’s theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems,” Journal of mathematical physics 47, 122107 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2393152
[39] E. Majorana, “Atomi orientati in campo magnetico variabile,” Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942) 9, 43–50 (1932).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960953
[40] A. W. Harrow, “The church of the symmetric subspace,” arXiv:1308.6595.
arXiv:arXiv:1308.6595
[41] U. Chabaud, D. Markham, and F. Grosshans, “Stellar representation of non-Gaussian quantum states,” Physical Review Letters 124, 063605 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.063605
[42] I. E. Segal and G. W. Mackey, “Mathematical problems of relativistic physics,”, vol. 2. American Mathematical Soc., 1963.
[43] V. Bargmann, “On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform part I,” Communications on pure and applied mathematics 14, 187–214 (1961).
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160140303
[44] K. Husimi, “Some formal properties of the density matrix,” Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series 22, 264–314 (1940).
https://doi.org/10.11429/ppmsj1919.22.4_264
[45] F. Ricci, “A contraction of SU (2) to the Heisenberg group,” Monatshefte für Mathematik 101, 211–225 (1986).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301660
[46] A. Vourdas, “Analytic representations in quantum mechanics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 39, R65 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/7/R01
[47] A. Ferraro, S. Olivares, and M. G. Paris, “Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information,” quant-ph/0503237.
arXiv:quant-ph/0503237
[48] L. G. Valiant, “The complexity of computing the permanent,” Theoretical computer science 8, 189–201 (1979).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(79)90044-6
[49] E. Schrödinger, “An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules,” Physical review 28, 1049 (1926).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049
[50] P. Leboeuf, “Phase space approach to quantum dynamics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24, 4575 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/19/021
[51] F. Calogero, “Exactly solvable two-dimensional many-body problems,” Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985) 16, 35–38 (1976).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02746871
[52] J. Moser, “Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connected with isospectral deformations,” in Surveys in applied mathematics, pp. 235–258. Elsevier, 1976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-492150-4.50023-8
[53] M. A. Olshanetsky and A. M. Perelomov, “Geodesic flows on symmetric spaces of zero curvature and explicit solution of the generalized Calogero model for the classical case,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications 10, 237–239 (1976).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075536
[54] M. A. Olshanetsky and A. M. Perelomov, “Classical integrable finite-dimensional systems related to Lie algebras,” Physics Reports 71, 313–400 (1981).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90023-5
[55] F. Calogero. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Calogero-Moser_system, 2008.
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Calogero-Moser_system
[56] A. P. Polychronakos, “The physics and mathematics of Calogero particles,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 39, 12793 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/41/S07
[57] M. Walschaers, “Non-Gaussian Quantum States and Where to Find Them,” PRX Quantum 2, 030204 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030204
[58] M. Amy, D. Maslov, M. Mosca, and M. Roetteler, “A meet-in-the-middle algorithm for fast synthesis of depth-optimal quantum circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 32, 818–830 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2013.2244643
[59] M. Beverland, E. Campbell, M. Howard, and V. Kliuchnikov, “Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations,” Quantum Science and Technology 5, 035009 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab8963
[60] A. Lvovsky, P. Grangier, A. Ourjoumtsev, V. Parigi, M. Sasaki, and R. Tualle-Brouri, “Production and applications of non-Gaussian quantum states of light,” arXiv:2006.16985.
arXiv:arXiv:2006.16985
[61] U. Chabaud, G. Roeland, M. Walschaers, F. Grosshans, V. Parigi, D. Markham, and N. Treps, “Certification of non-Gaussian states with operational measurements,” PRX Quantum 2, 020333 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020333
[62] J. Fiurášek, “Efficient construction of witnesses of the stellar rank of nonclassical states of light,” Optics Express 30, 30630–30639 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.466175
[63] S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, “Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas,” Physical Review A 71, 022316 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022316
[64] M. Yoganathan, R. Jozsa, and S. Strelchuk, “Quantum advantage of unitary Clifford circuits with magic state inputs,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 475, 20180427 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0427
[65] E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1038/35051009
[66] N. C. Menicucci, P. Van Loock, M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and M. A. Nielsen, “Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states,” Physical Review Letters 97, 110501 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.110501
[67] J. Zhang and S. L. Braunstein, “Continuous-variable Gaussian analog of cluster states,” Physical Review A 73, 032318 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032318
[68] M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, N. C. Menicucci, T. C. Ralph, and P. van Loock, “Quantum computing with continuous-variable clusters,” Physical Review A 79, 062318 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.062318
[69] B. Q. Baragiola, G. Pantaleoni, R. N. Alexander, A. Karanjai, and N. C. Menicucci, “All-Gaussian universality and fault tolerance with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code,” Physical Review Letters 123, 200502 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.200502
[70] B. C. Hall, “Holomorphic methods in analysis and mathematical physics. First Summer School in Analysis and Mathematical Physics,(Cuernavaca Morelos, 1998),” Contemp. Math 260, 1–59.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9912054
arXiv:quant-ph/9912054
[71] P. Leboeuf and A. Voros, “Chaos-revealing multiplicative representation of quantum eigenstates,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 23, 1765 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/23/10/017
[72] D. Ellinas and V. Kovanis, “Motion of the wave-function zeros in spin-boson systems,” Physical Review A 51, 4230 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.4230
[73] R. L. Hudson, “When is the Wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?,” Reports on Mathematical Physics 6, 249–252 (1974).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(74)90007-X
[74] F. Soto and P. Claverie, “When is the Wigner function of multidimensional systems nonnegative?,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 24, 97–100 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525607
[75] N. Lütkenhaus and S. M. Barnett, “Nonclassical effects in phase space,” Physical Review A 51, 3340 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.3340
[76] U. Chabaud, G. Ferrini, F. Grosshans, and D. Markham, “Classical simulation of Gaussian quantum circuits with non-Gaussian input states,” Physical Review Research 3, 033018 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033018
[77] U. Chabaud and M. Walschaers, “Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage,” arXiv:2207.11781.
arXiv:arXiv:2207.11781
[78] O. Bournez and M. L. Campagnolo, “A survey on continuous time computations,” in New computational paradigms, pp. 383–423. Springer, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68546-5_17
[79] L. G. Valiant, “Completeness classes in algebra,” in Proceedings of the eleventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 249–261. 1979.
https://doi.org/10.1145/800135.804419
[80] L. Blum, M. Shub, and S. Smale, “On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: NP-completeness, recursive functions and universal machines,” in The Collected Papers of Stephen Smale: Volume 3, pp. 1293–1338. World Scientific, 2000.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812792839_0013
[81] V. Bush, “The differential analyzer. A new machine for solving differential equations,” Journal of the Franklin Institute 212, 447–488 (1931).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(31)90616-9
[82] S. Smale, “Mathematical problems for the next century,” The mathematical intelligencer 20, 7–15 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025291
[83] L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, “From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,” Advances in Physics 65, 239–362 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2016.1198134
[84] S. Aaronson, A. Bouland, G. Kuperberg, and S. Mehraban, “The computational complexity of ball permutations,” in Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 317–327. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3055399.3055453
[85] K. Fukui and S. Takeda, “Building a large-scale quantum computer with continuous-variable optical technologies,” arXiv:2110.03247.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/ac489c
arXiv:arXiv:2110.03247
[86] D. Menzies and R. Filip, “Gaussian-optimized preparation of non-Gaussian pure states,” Physical Review A 79, 012313 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.012313
[87] R. Gomes, A. Salles, F. Toscano, P. S. Ribeiro, and S. Walborn, “Quantum entanglement beyond Gaussian criteria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 21517–21520 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908329106
[88] A. Ourjoumtsev, F. Ferreyrol, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, “Preparation of non-local superpositions of quasi-classical light states,” Nature Physics 5, 189–192 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1199
[89] C. M. Dawson and M. A. Nielsen, “The Solovay–Kitaev algorithm,” quant-ph/0505030.
arXiv:quant-ph/0505030
[90] S. Becker, N. Datta, L. Lami, and C. Rouzé, “Energy-Constrained Discrimination of Unitaries, Quantum Speed Limits, and a Gaussian Solovay-Kitaev Theorem,” Physical Review Letters 126, 190504 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.190504
[91] K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, “Density operators and quasiprobability distributions,” Physical Review 177, 1882 (1969).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882
[92] D. Petz, “An Invitation to the algebra of canonical commutation relations,” in Leuven notes in mathematical and theoretical physics, vol. 2. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, 1990.
[93] J. Dereziński, “Introduction to representations of the canonical commutation and anticommutation relations,” in Large Coulomb Systems, pp. 63–143. Springer, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32579-4_3
[94] A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, “Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light,” science 306, 660–662 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103190
[95] A. Serafini, “Quantum continuous variables: a primer of theoretical methods,”. CRC press, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315118727
[96] E. P. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” in Part I: Physical Chemistry. Part II: Solid State Physics, pp. 110–120. Springer, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59033-7_9
[97] C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, “Gaussian quantum information,” Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 621 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621
[98] G. S. Agarwal, “Quantum optics,”. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035170
[99] B. Demoen, P. Vanheuverzwijn, and A. Verbeure, “Completely positive maps on ccr-algebra,” Letters in mathematical physics 2, 161–166 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398582
[100] G. Giedke and J. I. Cirac, “Characterization of Gaussian operations and distillation of Gaussian states,” Physical Review A 66, 032316 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032316
[101] M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,” Physical Review Letters 73, 58 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58
[102] D. J. Korteweg and G. De Vries, “XLI. On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 39, 422–443 (1895).
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449508620739
[103] H. Airault, H. McKean, and J. Moser, “Rational and elliptic solutions of the korteweg-de vries equation and a related many-body problem,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 30, 95–148 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160300106
[104] B. B. Kadomtsev and V. I. Petviashvili, “On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersing media,” in Sov. Phys. Dokl, vol. 15, pp. 539–541. 1970.
[105] I. M. Krichever, “Rational solutions of the Kadomtsev—Petviashvili equation and integrable systems of N particles on a line,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications 12, 59–61 (1978).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077570
[106] P. Etingof, “Lectures on Calogero-Moser systems,” math/0606233.
arXiv:math/0606233
[107] U. Shackerley-Bennett, A. Pitchford, M. G. Genoni, A. Serafini, and D. K. Burgarth, “The reachable set of single-mode quadratic Hamiltonians,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 155203 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa6243
[108] U. J. Le Verrier, “Mémoire sur les variations séculaires des éléments des orbites: pour les sept planètes principales, Mercure, Vénus, la Terre, Mars, Jupiter, Saturne et Uranus,”. Bachelier, 1845.
[109] D. K. Faddeev and I. S. Sominskiĭ, “Problems in Higher algebra,”. Mir Publishers, 1972.
[110] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, “Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables,”, vol. 55. Courier Corporation, 1965.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15378
[111] A. Botero and B. Reznik, “Modewise entanglement of Gaussian states,” Physical Review A 67, 052311 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052311
[112] G. Giedke, J. Eisert, J. I. Cirac, and M. B. Plenio, “Entanglement transformations of pure Gaussian states,” quant-ph/0301038.
arXiv:quant-ph/0301038
[113] M. Walschaers, C. Fabre, V. Parigi, and N. Treps, “Statistical signatures of multimode single-photon-added and-subtracted states of light,” Physical Review A 96, 053835 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053835
[114] U. Leonhardt, “Essential Quantum Optics,”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1st ed., 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806117
[115] A. Wünsche, “Laguerre 2D-functions and their application in quantum optics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 31, 8267 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/40/017
Cited by
[1] Zuzana Gavorová, Matan Seidel, and Yonathan Touati, “Topological obstructions to implementing quantum if-clause”, arXiv:2011.10031.
[2] Ulysse Chabaud and Mattia Walschaers, “Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage”, arXiv:2207.11781.
[3] Ulysse Chabaud, Abhinav Deshpande, and Saeed Mehraban, “Quantum-inspired permanent identities”, arXiv:2208.00327.
The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2022-10-06 14:51:59). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2022-10-06 14:51:57: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2022-10-06-831 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.
