Connect with us

Quantum

A quantum walk down memory lane

Avatar

Published

on

In elementary and middle school, I felt an affinity for the class three years above mine. Five of my peers had siblings in that year. I carpooled with a student in that class, which partnered with mine in holiday activities and Grandparents’ Day revues. Two students in that class stood out. They won academic-achievement awards, represented our school in science fairs and speech competitions, and enrolled in rigorous high-school programs.

Those students came to mind as I grew to know David Limmer. David is an assistant professor of chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley. He studies statistical mechanics far from equilibrium, using information theory. Though a theorist ardent about mathematics, he partners with experimentalists. He can pass as a physicist and keeps an eye on topics as far afield as black holes. According to his faculty page, I discovered while writing this article, he’s even three years older than I. 

I met David in the final year of my PhD. I was looking ahead to postdocking, as his postdoc fellowship was fading into memory. The more we talked, the more I thought, I’d like to be like him.

Playground

I had the good fortune to collaborate with David on a paper published by Physical Review A this spring (as an Editors’ Suggestion!). The project has featured in Quantum Frontiers as the inspiration for a rewriting of “I’m a little teapot.” 

We studied a molecule prevalent across nature and technologies. Such molecules feature in your eyes, solar-fuel-storage devices, and more. The molecule has two clumps of atoms. One clump may rotate relative to the other if the molecule absorbs light. The rotation switches the molecule from a “closed” configuration to an “open” configuration.

Molecular switch

These molecular switches are small, quantum, and far from equilibrium; so modeling them is difficult. Making assumptions offers traction, but many of the assumptions disagreed with David. He wanted general, thermodynamic-style bounds on the probability that one of these molecular switches would switch. Then, he ran into me.

I traffic in mathematical models, developed in quantum information theory, called resource theories. We use resource theories to calculate which states can transform into which in thermodynamics, as a dime can transform into ten pennies at a bank. David and I modeled his molecule in a resource theory, then bounded the molecule’s probability of switching from “closed” to “open.” I accidentally composed a theme song for the molecule; you can sing along with this post.

That post didn’t mention what David and I discovered about quantum clocks. But what better backdrop for a mental trip to elementary school or to three years into the future?

I’ve blogged about autonomous quantum clocks (and ancient Assyria) before. Autonomous quantum clocks differ from quantum clocks of another type—the most precise clocks in the world. Scientists operate the latter clocks with lasers; autonomous quantum clocks need no operators. Autonomy benefits you if you want for a machine, such as a computer or a drone, to operate independently. An autonomous clock in the machine ensures that, say, the computer applies the right logical gate at the right time.

What’s an autonomous quantum clock? First, what’s a clock? A clock has a degree of freedom (e.g., a pair of hands) that represents the time and that moves steadily. When the clock’s hands point to 12 PM, you’re preparing lunch; when the clock’s hands point to 6 PM, you’re reading Quantum Frontiers. An autonomous quantum clock has a degree of freedom that represents the time fairly accurately and moves fairly steadily. (The quantum uncertainty principle prevents a perfect quantum clock from existing.)

Suppose that the autonomous quantum clock constitutes one part of a machine, such as a quantum computer, that the clock guides. When the clock is in one quantum state, the rest of the machine undergoes one operation, such as one quantum logical gate. (Experts: The rest of the machine evolves under one Hamiltonian.) When the clock is in another state, the rest of the machine undergoes another operation (evolves under another Hamiltonian).

Clock 2

Physicists have been modeling quantum clocks using the resource theory with which David and I modeled our molecule. The math with which we represented our molecule, I realized, coincided with the math that represents an autonomous quantum clock.

Think of the molecular switch as a machine that operates (mostly) independently and that contains an autonomous quantum clock. The rotating clump of atoms constitutes the clock hand. As a hand rotates down a clock face, so do the nuclei rotate downward. The hand effectively points to 12 PM when the switch occupies its “closed” position. The hand effectively points to 6 PM when the switch occupies its “open” position.

The nuclei account for most of the molecule’s weight; electrons account for little. They flit about the landscape shaped by the atomic clumps’ positions. The landscape governs the electrons’ behavior. So the electrons form the rest of the quantum machine controlled by the nuclear clock.

Clock 1

Experimentalists can create and manipulate these molecular switches easily. For instance, experimentalists can set the atomic clump moving—can “wind up” the clock—with ultrafast lasers. In contrast, the only other autonomous quantum clocks that I’d read about live in theory land. Can these molecules bridge theory to experiment? Reach out if you have ideas!

And check out David’s theory lab on Berkeley’s website and on Twitter. We all need older siblings to look up to.

Source: https://quantumfrontiers.com/2020/07/26/a-quantum-walk-down-memory-lane/

Quantum

On maximum-likelihood decoding with circuit-level errors

Avatar

Published

on

Leonid P. Pryadko

Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Error probability distribution associated with a given Clifford measurement circuit is described exactly in terms of the circuit error-equivalence group, or the circuit subsystem code previously introduced by Bacon, Flammia, Harrow, and Shi. This gives a prescription for maximum-likelihood decoding with a given measurement circuit. Marginal distributions for subsets of circuit errors are also analyzed; these generate a family of related asymmetric LDPC codes of varying degeneracy. More generally, such a family is associated with any quantum code. Implications for decoding highly-degenerate quantum codes are discussed.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] P. W. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,” Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.52.R2493

[2] C. G. Almudever, L. Lao, X. Fu, N. Khammassi, I. Ashraf, D. Iorga, S. Varsamopoulos, C. Eichler, A. Wallraff, L. Geck, A. Kruth, J. Knoch, H. Bluhm, and K. Bertels, “The engineering challenges in quantum computing,” in Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), 2017 (2017) pp. 836–845.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.23919/​DATE.2017.7927104

[3] P. Aliferis, D. Gottesman, and J. Preskill, “Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 6, 97–165 (2006), quant-ph/​0504218.
arXiv:quant-ph/0504218
http:/​/​dl.acm.org/​citation.cfm?id=2011665.2011666

[4] David S. Wang, Austin G. Fowler, and Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, “Surface code quantum computing with error rates over $1%$,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 020302 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.83.020302

[5] Christopher T. Chubb and Steven T. Flammia, “Statistical mechanical models for quantum codes with correlated noise,” (2018), unpublished, 1809.10704.
arXiv:1809.10704

[6] E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, “Topological quantum memory,” J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1499754

[7] Austin G. Fowler, Adam C. Whiteside, and Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, “Towards practical classical processing for the surface code,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 180501 (2012a).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.108.180501

[8] A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012b).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.86.032324

[9] Austin G. Fowler, Adam C. Whiteside, Angus L. McInnes, and Alimohammad Rabbani, “Topological code autotune,” Phys. Rev. X 2, 041003 (2012c).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.2.041003

[10] Christopher Chamberland, Guanyu Zhu, Theodore J. Yoder, Jared B. Hertzberg, and Andrew W. Cross, “Topological and subsystem codes on low-degree graphs with flag qubits,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 011022 (2020a).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.10.011022

[11] Christopher Chamberland, Aleksander Kubica, Theodore J Yoder, and Guanyu Zhu, “Triangular color codes on trivalent graphs with flag qubits,” New Journal of Physics 22, 023019 (2020b).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab68fd

[12] Christophe Vuillot, Lingling Lao, Ben Criger, Carmen García Almudéver, Koen Bertels, and Barbara M. Terhal, “Code deformation and lattice surgery are gauge fixing,” New Journal of Physics 21, 033028 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab0199

[13] Giacomo Torlai and Roger G. Melko, “Neural decoder for topological codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030501 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.030501

[14] S. Krastanov and L. Jiang, “Deep neural network probabilistic decoder for stabilizer codes,” Scientific Reports 7, 11003 (2017), 1705.09334.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41598-017-11266-1
arXiv:1705.09334

[15] N. P. Breuckmann and X. Ni, “Scalable neural network decoders for higher dimensional quantum codes,” Quantum 2, 68 (2018), 1710.09489.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-05-24-68
arXiv:1710.09489

[16] Zhih-Ahn Jia, Yuan-Hang Zhang, Yu-Chun Wu, Liang Kong, Guang-Can Guo, and Guo-Ping Guo, “Efficient machine-learning representations of a surface code with boundaries, defects, domain walls, and twists,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 012307 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.012307

[17] Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, and Carlo W. J. Beenakker, “Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code,” Quantum 2, 48 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-01-29-48

[18] Christopher Chamberland and Pooya Ronagh, “Deep neural decoders for near term fault-tolerant experiments,” Quantum Science and Technology 3, 044002 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​aad1f7

[19] P. Baireuther, M. D. Caio, B. Criger, C. W. J. Beenakker, and T. E. O’Brien, “Neural network decoder for topological color codes with circuit level noise,” New Journal of Physics 21, 013003 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​aaf29e

[20] Nishad Maskara, Aleksander Kubica, and Tomas Jochym-O’Connor, “Advantages of versatile neural-network decoding for topological codes,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 052351 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.052351

[21] D. Bacon, S. T. Flammia, A. W. Harrow, and J. Shi, “Sparse quantum codes from quantum circuits,” in Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’15 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015) pp. 327–334, 1411.3334.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1145/​2746539.2746608
arXiv:1411.3334

[22] D. Bacon, S. T. Flammia, A. W. Harrow, and J. Shi, “Sparse quantum codes from quantum circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 63, 2464–2479 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​TIT.2017.2663199

[23] Jozef Strečka, “Generalized algebraic transformations and exactly solvable classical-quantum models,” Physics Letters A 374, 3718 – 3722 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physleta.2010.07.030

[24] Christopher Chamberland and Michael E. Beverland, “Flag fault-tolerant error correction with arbitrary distance codes,” Quantum 2, 53 (2018), 1708.02246.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-02-08-53
arXiv:1708.02246

[25] C. Chamberland and A. W. Cross, “Fault-tolerant magic state preparation with flag qubits,” Quantum 3, 143 (2019), 1811.00566.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-05-20-143
arXiv:1811.00566

[26] Rui Chao and Ben W. Reichardt, “Quantum error correction with only two extra qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 050502 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.121.050502

[27] Héctor Bombín, “Single-shot fault-tolerant quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 031043 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.5.031043

[28] Benjamin J. Brown, Naomi H. Nickerson, and Dan E. Browne, “Fault-tolerant error correction with the gauge color code,” Nature Communications 7, 12302 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms12302

[29] Earl T. Campbell, “A theory of single-shot error correction for adversarial noise,” Quantum Science and Technology 4, 025006 (2019), 1805.09271.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​aafc8f
arXiv:1805.09271

[30] I. Dumer, A. A. Kovalev, and L. P. Pryadko, “Thresholds for correcting errors, erasures, and faulty syndrome measurements in degenerate quantum codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 050502 (2015), 1412.6172.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.115.050502
arXiv:1412.6172

[31] A. A. Kovalev, S. Prabhakar, I. Dumer, and L. P. Pryadko, “Numerical and analytical bounds on threshold error rates for hypergraph-product codes,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 062320 (2018), 1804.01950.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.97.062320
arXiv:1804.01950

[32] David Poulin, “Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230504 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.230504

[33] Dave Bacon, “Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 012340 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.73.012340

[34] Daniel Gottesman, Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech (1997).
arXiv:quant-ph/9705052

[35] A. R. Calderbank, E. M. Rains, P. M. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloane, “Quantum error correction via codes over GF(4),” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 44, 1369–1387 (1998).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​18.681315

[36] Jeroen Dehaene and Bart De Moor, “Clifford group, stabilizer states, and linear and quadratic operations over GF(2),” Phys. Rev. A 68, 042318 (2003).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.68.042318

[37] Scott Aaronson and Daniel Gottesman, “Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.70.052328

[38] Bin Dai, Shilin Ding, and Grace Wahba, “Multivariate Bernoulli distribution,” Bernoulli 19, 1465–1483 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3150/​12-BEJSP10

[39] F. Wegner, “Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters,” J. Math. Phys. 2259, 12 (1971).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1665530

[40] A. J. Landahl, J. T. Anderson, and P. R. Rice, “Fault-tolerant quantum computing with color codes,” (2011), presented at QIP 2012, December 12 to December 16, arXiv:1108.5738.
arXiv:arXiv:1108.5738

[41] A. A. Kovalev and L. P. Pryadko, “Spin glass reflection of the decoding transition for quantum error-correcting codes,” Quantum Inf. & Comp. 15, 0825 (2015), arXiv:1311.7688.
arXiv:arXiv:1311.7688

[42] Lars Onsager, “Crystal statistics. I. a two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition,” Phys. Rev. 65, 117–149 (1944).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRev.65.117

[43] Shigeo Naya, “On the spontaneous magnetizations of honeycomb and Kagomé Ising lattices,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 11, 53–62 (1954).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1143/​PTP.11.53

[44] Michael E. Fisher, “Transformations of Ising models,” Phys. Rev. 113, 969–981 (1959).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRev.113.969

[45] Sergey Bravyi, Martin Suchara, and Alexander Vargo, “Efficient algorithms for maximum likelihood decoding in the surface code,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 032326 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.90.032326

[46] Markus Hauru, Clement Delcamp, and Sebastian Mizera, “Renormalization of tensor networks using graph-independent local truncations,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 045111 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.97.045111

[47] M. de Koning, Wei Cai, A. Antonelli, and S. Yip, “Efficient free-energy calculations by the simulation of nonequilibrium processes,” Computing in Science Engineering 2, 88–96 (2000).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​5992.841802

[48] Charles H. Bennett, “Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data,” Journal of Computational Physics 22, 245–268 (1976).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0021-9991(76)90078-4

[49] Tobias Preis, Peter Virnau, Wolfgang Paul, and Johannes J. Schneider, “GPU accelerated monte carlo simulation of the 2d and 3d ising model,” Journal of Computational Physics 228, 4468 – 4477 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcp.2009.03.018

[50] A. Gilman, A. Leist, and K. A. Hawick, “3D lattice Monte Carlo simulations on FPGAs,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Design (CDES) (The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), 2013).

[51] Kun Yang, Yi-Fan Chen, Georgios Roumpos, Chris Colby, and John Anderson, “High performance Monte Carlo simulation of Ising model on TPU clusters,” (2019), unpublished, 1903.11714.
arXiv:1903.11714

[52] D. Poulin and Y. Chung, “On the iterative decoding of sparse quantum codes,” Quant. Info. and Comp. 8, 987 (2008), arXiv:0801.1241.
arXiv:arXiv:0801.1241

[53] Ye-Hua Liu and David Poulin, “Neural belief-propagation decoders for quantum error-correcting codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 200501 (2019), 1811.07835.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.200501
arXiv:1811.07835

[54] Alex Rigby, J. C. Olivier, and Peter Jarvis, “Modified belief propagation decoders for quantum low-density parity-check codes,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 012330 (2019), 1903.07404.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.100.012330
arXiv:1903.07404

[55] A. A. Kovalev, I. Dumer, and L. P. Pryadko, “Design of additive quantum codes via the code-word-stabilized framework,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 062319 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.84.062319

[56] Pavithran Iyer and David Poulin, “Hardness of decoding quantum stabilizer codes,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 61, 5209–5223 (2015), arXiv:1310.3235.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​TIT.2015.2422294
arXiv:arXiv:1310.3235

[57] E. A. Kruk, “Decoding complexity bound for linear block codes,” Probl. Peredachi Inf. 25, 103–107 (1989), (In Russian).
http:/​/​mi.mathnet.ru/​eng/​ppi665

[58] J. T. Coffey and R. M. Goodman, “The complexity of information set decoding,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 36, 1031 –1037 (1990).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​18.57202

[59] Andrew J. Viterbi, “Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13, 260–269 (1967).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​TIT.1967.1054010

[60] R. G. Gallager, Low-Density Parity-Check Codes (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1963).
https:/​/​doi.org/​doi=10.1.1.147.683

[61] M. P. C. Fossorier, “Iterative reliability-based decoding of low-density parity check codes,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 19, 908–917 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​49.924874

[62] Thomas J. Richardson and Rüdiger L. Urbanke, “The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding,” Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 47, 599–618 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​18.910577

[63] David Declerq, Marc Fossorier, and Ezio Biglieri, eds., Channel Coding. Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (Academic Press Library in Mobile and Wireless Communications, San Francisco, 2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​C2011-0-07211-3

[64] Weilei Zeng and Leonid P. Pryadko, “Iterative decoding of row-reduced quantum LDPC codes,” (2020), unpublished.

[65] F. J. MacWilliams and N. J. A. Sloane, The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).

[66] Omar Fawzi, Antoine Grospellier, and Anthony Leverrier, “Efficient decoding of random errors for quantum expander codes,” (2017), unpublished, 1711.08351.
arXiv:1711.08351

[67] Omar Fawzi, Antoine Grospellier, and Anthony Leverrier, “Constant overhead quantum fault-tolerance with quantum expander codes,” in 59th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2018, Paris, France, October 7-9, 2018 (2018) pp. 743–754.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​FOCS.2018.00076

[68] A. Grospellier and A. Krishna, “Numerical study of hypergraph product codes,” (2018), unpublished, 1810.03681.
arXiv:1810.03681

[69] Pavel Panteleev and Gleb Kalachev, “Degenerate quantum LDPC codes with good finite length performance,” (2019), unpublished, 1904.02703.
arXiv:1904.02703

[70] Antoine Grospellier, Lucien Grouès, Anirudh Krishna, and Anthony Leverrier, “Combining hard and soft decoders for hypergraph product codes,” (2020), unpublished, arXiv:2004.11199.
arXiv:arXiv:2004.11199

Cited by

[1] Nicolas Delfosse, Ben W. Reichardt, and Krysta M. Svore, “Beyond single-shot fault-tolerant quantum error correction”, arXiv:2002.05180.

The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2020-08-07 05:01:01). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

On Crossref’s cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-08-07 05:01:00).

Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-08-06-304/

Continue Reading

Quantum

A robust W-state encoding for linear quantum optics

Avatar

Published

on

Madhav Krishnan Vijayan1, Austin P. Lund2, and Peter P. Rohde1

1Centre for Quantum Software & Information (UTS:QSI), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia
2Centre for Quantum Computation & Communications Technology, School of Mathematics & Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD, Australia

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Error-detection and correction are necessary prerequisites for any scalable quantum computing architecture. Given the inevitability of unwanted physical noise in quantum systems and the propensity for errors to spread as computations proceed, computational outcomes can become substantially corrupted. This observation applies regardless of the choice of physical implementation. In the context of photonic quantum information processing, there has recently been much interest in $textit{passive}$ linear optics quantum computing, which includes boson-sampling, as this model eliminates the highly-challenging requirements for feed-forward via fast, active control. That is, these systems are $textit{passive}$ by definition. In usual scenarios, error detection and correction techniques are inherently $textit{active}$, making them incompatible with this model, arousing suspicion that physical error processes may be an insurmountable obstacle. Here we explore a photonic error-detection technique, based on W-state encoding of photonic qubits, which is entirely passive, based on post-selection, and compatible with these near-term photonic architectures of interest. We show that this W-state redundant encoding techniques enables the suppression of dephasing noise on photonic qubits via simple fan-out style operations, implemented by optical Fourier transform networks, which can be readily realised today. The protocol effectively maps dephasing noise into heralding failures, with zero failure probability in the ideal no-noise limit. We present our scheme in the context of a single photonic qubit passing through a noisy communication or quantum memory channel, which has not been generalised to the more general context of full quantum computation.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov. The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proceedings of the Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’11, page 333, 2011. 10.1364/​qim.2014.qth1a.2.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1364/​qim.2014.qth1a.2

[2] Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov. Bosonsampling is far from uniform. Quantum Information and Computation, 14: 1383, 2014.

[3] Scott Aaronson and Daniel J. Brod. BosonSampling with lost photons. Physical Review A, 93, 2016. 10.1103/​physreva.93.012335.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.93.012335

[4] Alex Arkhipov. BosonSampling is robust against small errors in the network matrix. Physical Review A, 92, 2015. 10.1103/​physreva.92.062326.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.92.062326

[5] Michael J. Bremner, Richard Jozsa, and Dan J. Shepherd. Classical simulation of commuting quantum computations implies collapse of the polynomial hierarchy. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 467: 459, 2011. 10.1098/​rspa.2010.0301.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1098/​rspa.2010.0301

[6] Daniel E. Browne, Jens Eisert, Stefan Scheel, and Martin B. Plenio. Driving non-gaussian to gaussian states with linear optics. Physical Review A, 67, 2003. 10.1103/​physreva.67.062320.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.67.062320

[7] L-M Duan, Mikhail D. Lukin, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature, 414: 413, 2001. 10.1038/​35106500.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​35106500

[8] Wolfgang Dür, Guifre Vidal, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Physical Review A, 62: 062314, 2000. 10.1103/​physreva.62.062314.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.62.062314

[9] Jens Eisert, Stefan Scheel, and Martin B. Plenio. Distilling gaussian states with gaussian operations is impossible. Physical Review Letters, 89: 137903, 2002. 10.1103/​physrevlett.89.137903.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevlett.89.137903

[10] Fabian Ewert and Peter van Loock. Ultrafast fault-tolerant long-distance quantum communication with static linear optics. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 012327, Jan 2017. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.012327.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.012327

[11] Nicolas Gisin, Noah Linden, Serge Massar, and S Popescu. Error filtration and entanglement purification for quantum communication. Physical Review A, 72: 012338, 2005. 10.1103/​physreva.72.012338.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.72.012338

[12] Aram W. Harrow and Ashley Montanaro. Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 549: 203, 2017. 10.1038/​nature23458.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23458

[13] YuXiao Jiang, PengLiang Guo, ChengYan Gao, HaiBo Wang, Faris Alzahrani, Aatef Hobiny, and FuGuo Deng. Self-error-rejecting photonic qubit transmission in polarization-spatial modes with linear optical elements. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 60: 120312, 2017. 10.1007/​s11433-017-9091-0.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11433-017-9091-0

[14] Gil Kalai and Guy Kindler. Gaussian Noise Sensitivity and BosonSampling, 2014. https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​1409.3093.
arXiv:1409.3093

[15] Emanuel Knill, Raymond Laflamme, and Gerald Milburn. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409: 46, 2001. 10.1038/​35051009.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​35051009

[16] Anthony Leverrier and Raúl García-Patrón. Analysis of circuit imperfections in bosonsampling. Quantum Information and Computation, 15: 489, 2015. ISSN 1533.

[17] Xi-Han Li, Fu-Guo Deng, and Hong-Yu Zhou. Faithful qubit transmission against collective noise without ancillary qubits. Applied Physics Letters, 91: 144101, 2007. 10.1063/​1.2794433.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.2794433

[18] Austin P. Lund, Michael J. Bremner, and Timothy C. Ralph. Quantum sampling problems, bosonsampling and quantum supremacy. NPJ Quantum Information, 3: 15, 2017. 10.1038/​s41534-017-0018-2.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-017-0018-2

[19] Ryan J. Marshman, Austin P. Lund, Peter P. Rohde, and Timothy Cameron Ralph. Passive quantum error correction of linear optics networks through error averaging. Physical Review A, 97: 22324, 2018. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.97.022324.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.97.022324

[20] Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. 10.1017/​cbo9780511976667.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​cbo9780511976667

[21] John Preskill. Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation, chapter 8, page 213. World Scientific, 1998. 10.1142/​9789812385253_0008.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1142/​9789812385253_0008

[22] Saleh Rahimi-Keshari, Timothy C. Ralph, and Carlton M. Caves. Sufficient conditions for efficient classical simulation of quantum optics. Physical Review X, 6: 21039, 2016. 10.1103/​PhysRevX.6.021039.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.6.021039

[23] Timothy C. Ralph and Austin P. Lund. Nondeterministic noiseless linear amplification of quantum systems. In AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, 2009. 10.1063/​1.3131295.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.3131295

[24] R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel. A one-way quantum computer. Physical Review Letters, 86: 5188, 2001. 10.1103/​physrevlett.86.5188.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevlett.86.5188

[25] R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Physical Review A, 68: 022312, 2003. 10.1103/​physreva.68.022312.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.68.022312

[26] Peter P. Rohde and Timothy C. Ralph. Error models for mode-mismatch in linear optics quantum computing. Physical Review A, 73: 062312, 2006. 10.1103/​physreva.73.062312.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.73.062312

[27] Peter P. Rohde and Timothy C. Ralph. Error tolerance of the boson-sampling model for linear optics quantum computing. Physical Review A, 85: 022332, 2012. 10.1103/​physreva.85.022332.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.85.022332

[28] V. S. Shchesnovich. Sufficient condition for the mode mismatch of single photons for scalability of the boson-sampling computer. Physical Review A, 89, 2014. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.89.022333.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.89.022333

[29] Dan Shepherd and Michael J. Bremner. Temporally unstructured quantum computation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 465: 1413, 2009. 10.1098/​rspa.2008.0443.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1098/​rspa.2008.0443

[30] Peter W. Shor. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Physical Review A, 52: R2493, 1995. 10.1103/​physreva.52.r2493.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.52.r2493

[31] Peter W. Shor. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In 37th Symposium on Foundations of Computing, page 56. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996. 10.1007/​978-1-4939-2864-4_143.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-1-4939-2864-4_143

[32] Malte C. Tichy. Sampling of partially distinguishable bosons and the relation to the multidimensional permanent. Physical Review A, 91, 2015. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.022316.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.022316

[33] Nathan Walk, Austin P. Lund, and Timothy C. Ralph. Nondeterministic noiseless amplification via non-symplectic phase space transformations. New Journal of Physics, 15: 73014, 2013. 10.1088/​1367-2630/​15/​7/​073014.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​15/​7/​073014

[34] G. Y. Xiang, Timothy C. Ralph, Austin P. Lund, Nathan Walk, and Geoff J. Pryde. Heralded noiseless linear amplification and distillation of entanglement. Nature Photonics, 4: 316, 2010. 10.1038/​nphoton.2010.35.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nphoton.2010.35

[35] Anton Zeilinger, Michael A. Horne, and D. M. Greenberger. Publ. no. 3135. In NASA Conference, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Code NTT, 1997.

Cited by

Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-08-03-303/

Continue Reading

Quantum

Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of noncontextuality inequalities and self-testing of quantum devices

Avatar

Published

on


Debashis Saha, Rafael Santos, and Remigiusz Augusiak

Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Aleja Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Violation of a noncontextuality inequality or the phenomenon referred to `quantum contextuality’ is a fundamental feature of quantum theory. In this article, we derive a novel family of noncontextuality inequalities along with their sum-of-squares decompositions in the simplest (odd-cycle) sequential-measurement scenario capable to demonstrate Kochen-Specker contextuality. The sum-of-squares decompositions allow us to obtain the maximal quantum violation of these inequalities and a set of algebraic relations necessarily satisfied by any state and measurements achieving it. With their help, we prove that our inequalities can be used for self-testing of three-dimensional quantum state and measurements. Remarkably, the presented self-testing results rely on weaker assumptions than the ones considered in Kochen-Specker contextuality.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] B. Amaral and M. T. Cunha. Contextuality: The Compatibility-Hypergraph Approach, pages 13–48. Springer Briefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/​978-3-319-93827-1_2.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-319-93827-1_2

[2] M. Araújo, M. T. Quintino, C. Budroni, M. T. Cunha, and A. Cabello. All noncontextuality inequalities for the $n$-cycle scenario. Phys. Rev. A, 88: 022118, 2013. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.88.022118.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.88.022118

[3] R. Augusiak, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, and A. Acín. Bell inequalities tailored to the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states of arbitrary local dimension. New J. Phys., 21(11): 113001, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab4d9f.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab4d9f

[4] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1: 195–200, 1964. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

[5] C. Bamps and S. Pironio. Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing. Phys. Rev. A, 91: 052111, 2015. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.052111.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.052111

[6] K. Bharti, M. Ray, A. Varvitsiotis, A. Cabello, and L. Kwek. Local certification of programmable quantum devices of arbitrary high dimensionality. 2019. https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​1911.09448.
arXiv:1911.09448

[7] K. Bharti, M. Ray, A. Varvitsiotis, N. Warsi, A. Cabello, and L. Kwek. Robust Self-Testing of Quantum Systems via Noncontextuality Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122: 250403, 2019. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.250403.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.250403

[8] P. Busch and J. Singh. Lüders theorem for unsharp quantum measurements. Physics Letters A, 249(1): 10–12, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/​S0375-9601(98)00704-X.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0375-9601(98)00704-X

[9] P. Busch. Unsharp reality and joint measurements for spin observables. Phys. Rev. D, 33: 2253–2261, 1986. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevD.33.2253.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevD.33.2253

[10] A. Cabello. Experimentally Testable State-Independent Quantum Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 210401, 2008. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.210401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.210401

[11] A. Cabello. Simple Explanation of the Quantum Violation of a Fundamental Inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110: 060402, 2013. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.110.060402.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.110.060402

[12] A. Coladangelo, K. Goh, and V. Scarani. All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested. Nature Communications, 8(1): 15485, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/​ncomms15485.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms15485

[13] D. Cui, A. Mehta, H. Mousavi, and S. Nezhadi. A generalization of CHSH and the algebraic structure of optimal strategies. 2019.

[14] A. Cabello, S. Severini, and A. Winter. Graph-Theoretic Approach to Quantum Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112: 040401, 2014. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.040401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.040401

[15] M. Farkas and J. Kaniewski. Self-testing mutually unbiased bases in the prepare-and-measure scenario. Phys. Rev. A, 99: 032316, 2019. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.032316.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.032316

[16] O. Gühne, C. Budroni, A. Cabello, M. Kleinmann, and J. Larsson. Bounding the quantum dimension with contextuality. Phys. Rev. A, 89: 062107, 2014. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.89.062107.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.89.062107

[17] A. Grudka, K. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, P. Joshi, W. Kłobus, and A. Wójcik. Quantifying Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112: 120401, 2014. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.120401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.120401

[18] M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch, and J. Emerson. Contextuality supplies the “magic” for quantum computation. Nature, 510(7505): 351–355, 2014. DOI: 10.1038/​nature13460.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature13460

[19] A. Irfan, K. Mayer, G. Ortiz, and E. Knill. Certified quantum measurement of Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. A, 101: 032106, 2020. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.032106.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.032106

[20] J. Kaniewski. A weak form of self-testing. 2019. https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​1910.00706.
arXiv:1910.00706

[21] P. Kurzyński, A. Cabello, and D. Kaszlikowski. Fundamental Monogamy Relation between Contextuality and Nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112: 100401, 2014. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.100401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.100401

[22] A. Klyachko, M. Can, S. Binicioğlu, and A. Shumovsky. Simple Test for Hidden Variables in Spin-1 Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101: 020403, 2008. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.020403.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.020403

[23] S. Kochen and E. Specker. The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. In The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, pages 293–328. Springer Netherlands, 1975. DOI: 10.1007/​978-94-010-1795-4.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-94-010-1795-4

[24] J. Kaniewski, I. Šupić, J. Tura, F. Baccari, A. Salavrakos, and R. Augusiak. Maximal nonlocality from maximal entanglement and mutually unbiased bases, and self-testing of two-qutrit quantum systems. Quantum, 3: 198, 2019. DOI: 10.22331/​q-2019-10-24-198.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-10-24-198

[25] Y. Liang, R. Spekkens, and H. Wiseman. Specker$’$s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity. Phys. Rep., 506(1): 1–39, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/​j.physrep.2011.05.001.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2011.05.001

[26] D. Mayers and A. Yao. Self testing quantum apparatus. Quantum Inf. Comput., 4(4): 273–286, 2004. DOI: doi.org/​10.26421/​QIC4.4.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.26421/​QIC4.4

[27] M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight. The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 70: 101–144, 1998. DOI: 10.1103/​RevModPhys.70.101.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.70.101

[28] R. Raussendorf. Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A, 88: 022322, 2013. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.88.022322.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.88.022322

[29] I. Šupić, R. Augusiak, A. Salavrakos, and A. Acín. Self-testing protocols based on the chained bell inequalities. New J. Phys., 18(3): 035013, 2016. DOI: 10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​3/​035013.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​3/​035013

[30] A. Salavrakos, R. Augusiak, J. Tura, P. Wittek, A. Acín, and S. Pironio. Bell Inequalities Tailored to Maximally Entangled States. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119: 040402, 2017. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.040402.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.040402

[31] J. Singh, K. Bharti, and Arvind. Quantum key distribution protocol based on contextuality monogamy. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 062333, 2017. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.062333.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.062333

[32] D. Saha, P. Horodecki, and M. Pawłowski. State independent contextuality advances one-way communication. New J. Phys., 21(9): 093057, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab4149.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​ab4149

[33] D. Saha and R. Ramanathan. Activation of monogamy in nonlocality using local contextuality. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 030104, 2017. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.030104.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.030104

[34] S. Sarkar, D. Saha, J. Kaniewski, and R. Augusiak. Self-testing quantum systems of arbitrary local dimension with minimal number of measurements. 2019. https:/​/​arxiv.org/​abs/​1909.12722v2.
arXiv:1909.12722v2

[35] A. Tavakoli, J. Kaniewski, T. Vértesi, D. Rosset, and N. Brunner. Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario. Phys. Rev. A, 98: 062307, 2018. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.062307.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.062307

[36] Z. Xu, D. Saha, H. Su, M. Pawłowski, and J. Chen. Reformulating noncontextuality inequalities in an operational approach. Phys. Rev. A, 94: 062103, 2016. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevA.94.062103.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.94.062103

[37] T. Yang, T. Vértesi, J. Bancal, V. Scarani, and M. Navascués. Robust and Versatile Black-Box Certification of Quantum Devices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113: 040401, 2014. DOI: 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.113.040401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.113.040401

Cited by

Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-08-03-302/

Continue Reading
AI3 hours ago

Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in Content Writing

Publications4 hours ago

Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai arrested under security law

Cannabis5 hours ago

How to make a cannabis-infused canna-grapefruit spritz

Cannabis5 hours ago

Could Joe Biden budge on cannabis legalization?

Cannabis5 hours ago

4 weed products Weldon Angelos can’t live without

Blockchain6 hours ago

A $15K Bitcoin Likely As Price Breaks Above “Multi-Year Bullish Triangle”

Blockchain6 hours ago

Ethereum Classic Under Multiple 51% Attacks | Bitcoin News Summary Aug 10, 2020

Publications6 hours ago

Chinese Tesla rival Xpeng Motors files for New York IPO

Publications6 hours ago

U.S. health chief offers Taiwan ‘strong’ support in landmark visit

Publications6 hours ago

Stock futures mixed after Trump signs orders extending coronavirus relief

Blockchain7 hours ago

Number of Bitcoin Cash Whales Drop Following 39% Price Surge

Blockchain7 hours ago

Bitcoin Price Tackles $12,000 After Breaking Through a Key Resistance Zone

Blockchain8 hours ago

Japanese Messaging Giant LINE’s LN Token Trading on BitMax

Blockchain9 hours ago

Bitcoin Erupts Past $12,000: Here’s What Analysts Think Comes Next

Publications9 hours ago

Some office space could get permanently cut during the pandemic. Here’s how companies will cope

Blockchain10 hours ago

Here’s Why Analysts Are Expecting For Ethereum To Drop Back Towards $370

Publications10 hours ago

Pelosi slams Trump’s executive actions on coronavirus relief: ‘Absurdly unconstitutional’

Automotive11 hours ago

Hyundai launches Ioniq as a standalone brand to exclusively make electric cars

Blockchain11 hours ago

How Miners Can Hedge Their Inventory to Increase Return on Investment

Blockchain13 hours ago

Analysts Expect Chainlink (LINK) Reversal After 50% Eruption to $14

Blockchain13 hours ago

BAND Token is Now Available for Trading on Huobi Global

Publications13 hours ago

Amazon reportedly discussing using former J.C. Penney and Sears stores as fulfillment centers

Blockchain14 hours ago

DeFi has more than just yield farming to thank for the recent surge

Automotive14 hours ago

Judge denies bail for men accused of sneaking Carlos Ghosn out of Japan

Blockchain15 hours ago

What Hope Do Bears Have If Bitcoin Holds $11,500? Analyst Asks

Blockchain16 hours ago

Cardano short/medium-term price analysis: August 09

Publications16 hours ago

U.S. tops 5 million coronavirus cases as outbreak threatens America’s Midwest

Automotive17 hours ago

School buses are another coronavirus question mark

Blockchain17 hours ago

Will Bitcoin be the go-to asset during the incoming stagflation?

Cannabis17 hours ago

5 Thing You Can Do To Make Your Weeks Run Smoother

Automotive17 hours ago

Max Verstappen wins 70th Anniversary Grand Prix at Silverstone

Blockchain17 hours ago

Economic Crisis Leaves US Government Officials in State of Confusion

Blockchain18 hours ago

Litecoin short-term price analysis: 09 August

Automotive18 hours ago

This ‘Hoverboard’ can transform into a rideable 4-wheeler

Blockchain19 hours ago

Bitcoin: What to expect during institutional ‘land grab’ phase?

Blockchain19 hours ago

LINK Trading Volume Surpasses Bitcoin on Coinbase

Publications20 hours ago

While some techies flee Silicon Valley, this Waymo engineer is doubling down and running for office

Blockchain20 hours ago

Bitcoin’s price surge has depleted long-term hodlings

Blockchain21 hours ago

The Top Dice Strategies That Actually Make You Money

Cannabis21 hours ago

Stanley Brothers Face Another Setback with Final Refusal of “CW” Trademark

Trending