Get familiar with Python string basics, the most commonly used Python string methods, and a multitude of ways to convert Python methods into Python strings.

  “What would happen if Halo and Portal meet up?” Splitgate happens. That premise has been used to promote this game since the beginning. But why, if it’s a mix between two highly-acclaimed games, then it’s not well-known? Let’s find out.   Review: What Is Splitgate: Arena Warfare? Is It Worth It In 2021? As […]

The post Review of Splitgate: Arena Warfare In 2021 🌀 Is It Still Worth It? appeared first on Gamer One.

  The battle royale genre has been dominating the gaming world lately and sadly, the beautifully creative SpellBreak hasn’t got the attention it deserves.  Is Spellbreak worth buying? Well, the class-based third-person shooter is free-to-play, so you won’t have to spend a dime to play. But is it worth playing?  That’s what we’ll find out […]

The post Review of SpellBreak in 2021 🧙 Is It Still Worth It? appeared first on Gamer One.

Grassroots Carbon Presents: “Soil Carbon Sequestration: How Nature Captures and Stores Carbon” A free webinar featuring Blue Nest Beef’s CEO Russ Conser. Watch...

As FaZe Clan members and influencers such as Youtuber Bryan Quang “RiceGum” Le and Sommer Ray, who were involved in promoting the fake crypto token charity Save The Kids, deal with the fallout from their involvement (Frazier “FaZe Kay” Khattri was removed from the organization on July 1, while three others were suspended), the community […]

The post The possible legal peril facing ‘Save The Kids’ endorsers first appeared on ARCHIVE - The Esports Observer.

If you have a surprise FDA inspector visit, you should never be scared because there is no difference between the best and worst-case outcome. Why are you scared of an FDA inspector? There are a number of reasons why you might be scared of an FDA inspector, but if you keep reading you will learn […]

The post Smile, because you should never be scared of a surprise FDA inspector appeared first on Medical Device Academy.

HOW DOES SOIL CARBON STORAGE WORK? In a nutshell, soil carbon storage works through a natural process where plants pull carbon dioxide out of...

One of the objectives of the Raising the Bar IP law reforms – most of which commenced on 15 April 2013 – was to reduce delays in the resolution of patent (and trade mark) applications.  The perceived problem with such delays was not that applicants were unhappy with the speed of processing of their applications (in fact, most choose to defer examination and acceptance of their patent applications), but rather that delays create uncertainty about whether a patent will be granted, and what scope the granted claims might have.  As noted in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Raising the Bar Bill, ‘[d]elay may suit the party, but it is not in the interests of the public, or the party’s competitors.’

There were four main features of the reforms that were expected to reduce delays and uncertainty:

1. reduction, from six months to two months, of the period within which an applicant is required to request examination, once directed to do so by the patent office;
2. reduction of the maximum period available for an applicant to obtain acceptance of a patent application, following issue of an initial examination report, from 21 months down to 12 months;
3. ‘tightening’ of the rules around when divisional applications can be validly filed, to reduce opportunities for what the Explanatory Memorandum describes as ‘abusive uses’; and
4. refinement of opposition proceedings, mostly in the form of more stringent criteria for obtaining extensions of time.

The reforms to opposition proceedings had an almost immediate impact, since they applied to all new oppositions filed on or after 15 April 2013, as well as (to a more limited degree) oppositions that were already in progress.  However, since over 99.5% of all accepted applications are not opposed, the reduction in opposition duration is irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of cases. 

It has taken longer to reach the point at which there is sufficient data to evaluate the effect of the change to the examination period, since this only applied to applications for which a request for examination was filed on or after 15 April 2013.  Many of these applications remained in the system for years.  Indeed, the last patent to be granted under the pre-Raising the Bar regime – without being additionally delayed by opposition proceedings – was no. 2010311063, which was derived from a PCT application that entered the national phase in Australia on 17 May 2012.  Examination was requested on 9 April 2013, and a first report issued on 7 August 2018 (after the application inadvertently lapsed and was restored).  The application was eventually accepted on 17 February 2020, and the patent granted on 18 June 2020.

I have now analysed nearly two decades worth of Australian patent examination data, spanning the period before and after commencement of the Raising the Bar reforms.  Further details and charts are below, but in summary I have found that:

1. reduction of the maximum examination period by nine months (from 21 to 12 months) has resulted in a drop of only a little over three months in the median period between initial examination and acceptance of successful applications;
2. the reforms have not, however, resulted in any lasting improvement in the pendency of the most ‘stubborn’ applications, which are only accepted following one or more divisional applications being filed for the purposes of continuing examination (for want of any better term, I call these ‘continuation divisionals’);
3. as a result, the ‘top’ 2% of cases are still pending for 900 days or more between an initial examination report being issued and an application finally being accepted;
4. perversely, following an initial temporary drop in the number of continuation divisionals, the reforms actually seem to have resulted in an increase in the proportion of divisional applications that are filed for the primary purpose of continuing examination;
5. on the other hand, however, the major use (i.e. over 60%) of divisional applications remains their primary purpose of pursuing alternative claims following acceptance of claims in a parent application.

Overall, reducing the examination period has had a relatively minimal effect on total pendency of patent applications – a reduction in the time prior to examination, i.e. between filing and a first examination report being issued, has been much more significant.  However, it appears to have had the unintended consequence of increasing the use of divisional applications to continue examination.

Read more »

So, you have a pretty amazing product — it fits into your online niche and the marketing strategy seems great, but what will turn someone who’s just browsing into becoming a buyer? Yes, sales have been satisfactory, but you need to boost them. Everyone wants to get to the next level. You may have some […]

President of the International Publishers’ Association, Sheika Bodour bint Sultan Al Qasimi discusses the challenges confronting publishers in the post-COVID era.

Jag Singh, Managing Director, Techstars, Berlin, offers an investor’s perspective on why it is important for startups and SMEs think about IP at the earliest opportunity.

  Are you wondering if PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS (PUBG) is still a good game to play in 2021? Would you like to know if it keeps being popular? Maybe you found it accidentally… Someone told you about it… Or you play it already. Whatever the case, we might answer one or many of your game-related questions […]

The post Review of PUBG in 2021 🪂 Is It Still Worth It? appeared first on Gamer One.