Zephyrnet Logo

Tag: Cards

Vergeway Walkthrough Chapter 10

Chapter 10 Vergeway Walkthrough

Ok. Because you guys suck, I’m going to have to spell out everything step by step. You’re bloody welcome… Well to be fair, one of the fans sent in a lot of this information. Some of the fans aren’t too bad, if I have to be honest! Partial credit for...

The post Vergeway Walkthrough Chapter 10 appeared first on Marks Angry Review.

Walkthrough for Vergeway Chapter 2

Chapter 2 Vergeway Lords Mobile

Okay. I’m going to get through the Vergeway Chapters at my own pace (hopefully one per week). Here’s Vergeway Chapter 2. Please level up your cards as fast as possible. If the technique doesn’t work, you need to unlock more chests. Vergeway Chapter 2 Stage 1 Start with 35 Aether...

The post Walkthrough for Vergeway Chapter 2 appeared first on Marks Angry Review.

The Ultimate NFT Slang Dictionary

If you are trading NFTs and want a completely free automated NFT scam prevention tool, make sure to check out Pocket Universe. It does...

Walkthrough for Vergeway Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Vergeway Lords Mobile

Ever since the release of the famous Vergeway expansion, people have been asking me how to beat a particular stage they got stuck on. Well, worry not, trusted fan, I’ve got your back! After my run-through and some additional testing, I come with a (mostly) foolproof walkthrough to make your...

The post Walkthrough for Vergeway Chapter 1 appeared first on Marks Angry Review.

Shopify vs Shopify Plus: 6 Key Differences

Shopify Plus makes it easier for larger enterprises to do business online. Compared with its simpler version, Shopify ‘Standard’, Shopify Plus is superior in many ways. Right now, it’s possible to do business online in quantities not imaginable a few years ago. With its several custom features, Shopify Plus makes eCommerce selling easy for large […]

In Becoming the First Country to Recognise Non-Human Inventors, is Australia a Hero of Progress, or a Chump?

In Becoming the First Country to Recognise Non-Human Inventors, is Australia a Hero of Progress, or a Chump?

Menacing cyborgAs I recently (tentatively) predicted, on Friday 30 July 2021 Justice Beach in the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment giving Australia the dubious honour of becoming the first country in the world to legally recognise a non-human as a valid inventor on a patent application: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879.  I would suggest that the remarkable speed with which this unnecessarily lengthy (228 paragraphs) decision was rendered, after being heard on 2 July 2021, may reflect the judge’s enthusiasm for issuing such a ground-breaking ruling.  Unfortunately, I do not share that enthusiasm, and I am confident that there are many others who are equally uncomfortable with the outcome.  My hope is that this includes officials within IP Australia and the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, and that the decision will be duly appealed to a Full Bench of the court.  It is, in my view, deeply regrettable that the Commissioner of Patents did not put on a stronger defence in the first instance because, even though an appeal was probably inevitable either way, the worldwide publicity that this decision is now generating is not necessarily beneficial for Australia.

The judge summarised his reasoning (at [10]) that:

…in my view an artificial intelligence system can be an inventor for the purposes of the Act. First, an inventor is an agent noun; an agent can be a person or thing that invents. Second, so to hold reflects the reality in terms of many otherwise patentable inventions where it cannot sensibly be said that a human is the inventor. Third, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.

The patent system faces many challenges, but right now a need to grant more patents in a wider range of circumstances in not one of them.  We are in the grip of a global pandemic, and very serious questions are being asked about whether patents deliver a net benefit to the people of the world by incentivising the development of new vaccines and treatments, or whether they have the detrimental effect of denying affordable access to vital care and protection in poor and developing nations.  While I am firmly in the former camp, it only becomes harder to defend the patent system when opponents see the law expanding access to allow inventions generated by machines – potentially including those owned and controlled by giant corporations.

The standing and reputation of Australia and our patent laws are also at risk.  The country is already the target of criticism – rightly or wrongly – for declining to support calls for a waiver of IP provisions of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS).  The Federal Court’s decision in Thaler is receiving global attention, and not all of it is positive.  One tweet (in Spanish) compares Australia’s patent-friendly approach unfavourably with the infamous incident of an early innovation patent being granted for a ‘circular transportation facilitation device’, a.k.a. the wheel.

Just because patents are (or, at least, can be) good, it does not follow that more patents, generated in more ways, by more entities, must be better.  Australia should not think that we will necessarily come across as a socially and technologically progressive nation by ‘leading the way’ on allowing patents to be granted for inventions generated by non-humans.  On the contrary, we risk being left out on our own and looking like chumps.  The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors.  The European Patent Office will not follow in the foreseeable future – it has already established its position via an academic study and discussions with member states of the European Patent Convention.  The UK has so far rejected any expansion of inventorship to non-humans.  And, contrary to recent reports (and the claims of the Artificial Inventor Project’s Ryan Abbott), the recent grant of a patent in South Africa naming DABUS as inventor indicates nothing about that country’s law or position on the issue.  As South African patent attorney Pieter Visagie has explained, the application effectively avoided any scrutiny of the legitimacy of the inventor by virtue of being filed via the international (PCT) system.

So what does Australia gain by being the first – and possibly only – country in the world to legally recognise non-human inventors?  Nothing, as far as I can see, other than a whole lot of unneeded publicity and global scrutiny of our patent laws.  If we are lucky, we will not receive many serious patent applications for inventions generated by machine inventors, and little practical harm will be done.  At worst, however, we could become the only country in the world to grant patents on such inventions, mostly filed by foreign applicants, creating exclusive rights that are enforceable only in Australia to the relative detriment of Australian innovators and consumers.

Read more »

7 ‎Ways to Prevent Invoice & Email Fraud: A Comprehensive Guide

A Comprehensive Guide to Preventing B2B Payments Fraud

The FBI reported that Business Email Compromise (BEC) and invoice fraud has cost U.S. businesses more than $2 billion between 2014 and 2019 through BEC scams. These events have been reported in all 50 states and in 177 countries.

If businesses and corporate finance professionals do not find a way to mitigate the risk of email and invoice fraud quickly, we could see twelve-figure losses in the not too distant future. That’s why we’ve created a comprehensive guide to help you reduce the risk of invoice and email fraud in 2021 and beyond.

First, we’ll take a look at the primary reasons why invoice and email fraud are on the rise, and then we’ll outline seven ways to avoid it. Like all things, protection starts by understanding the root cause. 

SALT Opens Waitlist for the SALT Card, the First Crypto Credit Card Designed to Help You HODL

SALT has announced the waitlist for the SALT Card, its new credit card product, is now open. Better yet, as the company is actively designing the card, it’s allowing potential customers to share their thoughts and input on everything from material to style. If you want to weigh in and share your ideas with SALT’s product team, you can do so here. The SALT Card is the first crypto credit card that lets you use your crypto to buy anything — from large purchases like vacations to everyday purchases like coffee and groceries– without selling or spending any of your

The post SALT Opens Waitlist for the SALT Card, the First Crypto Credit Card Designed to Help You HODL first appeared on Bitcoins In Ireland.

9 Common Characteristics of Top Shopify Stores

Hosting over one and a half million online stores operating from 175 countries, generating annual transactions worth $60 billion — Shopify has emerged as one of the most popular eCommerce marketplaces in the world. With the range of support services store owners enjoy, the Shopify platform is attractive to many online entrepreneurs. These services include […]

4 Ways AP Automation is Essential for Retail Companies

Retail is an industry where COVID-19 didn’t set entirely new trends—it sped up ones that were already happening.

The 13 Best Sales Enablement Software & Platforms in 2023

Sales enablement platforms are to feed sales representatives with productive content and give them opportunities to sell.It has become a necessity for sales enablement...

Latest Intelligence

spot_img
spot_img