• Daly A.C.
• et al.

Bioprinting for the biologist.

Cell. 2021; 184: 18-32

• Malda J.
• et al.

25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication.

Adv. Mater. 2013; 25: 5011-5028

• Schwab A.
• et al.

Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting.

Chem. Rev. 2020; 120: 11028-11055

• Highley C.B.
• et al.

Jammed microgel inks for 3D printing applications.

Adv. Sci. (Weinh.). 2019; 61801076

• Kessel B.
• et al.

3D bioprinting of macroporous materials based on entangled hydrogel microstrands.

Adv. Sci. (Weinh.). 2020; 72001419

• Pedde R.D.
• et al.

Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs.

Adv. Mater. 2017; 29e1606061

• Chimene D.
• et al.

Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies.

Adv. Mater. 2020; 32e1902026

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.

Biofabrication. 2016; 8035020

• Lee S.C.
• et al.

Physical and chemical factors influencing the printability of hydrogel-based extrusion bioinks.

Chem. Rev. 2020; 120: 10834-10886

• Paxton N.
• et al.

Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.

Biofabrication. 2017; 9044107

• Blaeser A.
• et al.

Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016; 5: 326-333

• Nair K.
• et al.

Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes.

Biotechnol. J. 2009; 4: 1168-1177

• Ning L.
• et al.

Characterization of cell damage and proliferative ability during and after bioprinting.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018; 4: 3906-3918

• Soliman B.G.
• et al.

Development and characterization of gelatin-norbornene bioink to understand the interplay between physical architecture and micro-capillary formation in biofabricated vascularized constructs.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021; 2021e2101873

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions.

Biofabrication. 2015; 7015010

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

Expanding and optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary network bioinks.

Sci. Adv. 2020; 6eabc5529

• Guimarães C.F.
• et al.

The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering.

Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020; 5: 351-370

• Chaudhuri O.
• et al.

Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Nature. 2020; 584: 535-546

• Zhang J.
• et al.

Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.

Acta Biomater. 2020; 114: 307-322

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks.

Adv. Mater. 2017; 291604983

• Shao L.
• et al.

Pre-shear bioprinting of highly oriented porous hydrogel microfibers to construct anisotropic tissues.

Biomater. Sci. 2021; 9: 6763-6771

• Mirani B.
• et al.

Microfluidic 3D printing of a photo-cross-linkable bioink using insights from computational modeling.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021; 7: 3269-3280

• Hwangbo H.
• et al.

Bio-printing of aligned GelMa-based cell-laden structure for muscle tissue regeneration.

Bioact. Mater. 2022; 8: 57-70

• Soliman B.G.
• et al.

Stepwise control of crosslinking in a one-pot system for bioprinting of low-density bioinks.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020; 9e1901544

• Colosi C.
• et al.

Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink.

Adv. Mater. 2016; 28: 677-684

• Zhu K.
• et al.

A general strategy for extrusion bioprinting of bio-macromolecular bioinks through alginate-templated dual-stage crosslinking.

Macromol. Biosci. 2018; 18e1800127

• Ning L.
• et al.

Bioprinting Schwann cell-laden scaffolds from low-viscosity hydrogel compositions.

J. Mater. Chem. B. 2019; 7: 4538-4551

• Gao Q.
• et al.

Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery.

Biomaterials. 2015; 61: 203-215

• Kim H.
• et al.

Light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021; 31e2011252

• McCormack A.
• et al.

3D printing in suspension baths: keeping the promises of bioprinting afloat.

Trends Biotechnol. 2020; 38: 584-593

• Lee A.
• et al.

3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart.

Science. 2019; 365: 482-487

• Hinton T.J.
• et al.

Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels.

Sci. Adv. 2015; 1e1500758

• Dubbin K.
• et al.

Dual-stage crosslinking of a gel-phase bioink improves cell viability and homogeneity for 3D bioprinting.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016; 5: 2488-2492

• Jeon O.
• et al.

Cryopreserved cell-laden alginate microgel bioink for 3D bioprinting of living tissues.

Mater. Today Chem. 2019; 12: 61-70

• Song K.
• et al.

Injectable gelatin microgel-based composite ink for 3D bioprinting in air.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020; 12: 22453-22466

• Xin S.
• et al.

Clickable PEG hydrogel microspheres as building blocks for 3D bioprinting.

Biomater. Sci. 2019; 7: 1179-1187

• Song K.
• et al.

Computational study of extrusion bioprinting with jammed gelatin microgel-based composite ink.

Addit. Manuf. 2021; 41101963

• Xin S.
• et al.

Generalizing hydrogel microparticles into a new class of bioinks for extrusion bioprinting.

Sci. Adv. 2021; 7eabk3087

• Seymour A.J.
• et al.

3D printing of microgel scaffolds with tunable void fraction to promote cell infiltration.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021; 10e2100644

• Tan Z.
• et al.

Cryogenic 3D printing of super soft hydrogels.

Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 16293

• Naghieh S.
• et al.

Indirect 3D bioprinting and characterization of alginate scaffolds for potential nerve tissue engineering applications.

J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019; 93: 183-193

• Cui X.
• et al.

Rapid photocrosslinking of silk hydrogels with high cell density and enhanced shape fidelity.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020; 9e1901667

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

Void-free 3D bioprinting for in-situ endothelialization and microfluidic perfusion.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020; 301908349

• Noor N.
• et al.

3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts.

Adv. Sci. (Weinh.). 2019; 61900344

• Zhang Y.
• et al.

3D printed collagen structures at low concentrations supported by jammed microgels.

Bioprinting. 2021; 21e00121

• Ying G.L.
• et al.

Aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels.

Adv. Mater. 2018; 30e1805460

• Ying G.
• et al.

Bioprinted injectable hierarchically porous gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel constructs with shape-memory properties.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020; 302003740

• Shao L.
• et al.

Sacrificial microgel-laden bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of mesoscale pore networks.

Bio Design Manuf. 2020; 3: 30-39

• Yin J.
• et al.

3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018; 10: 6849-6857

• Pati F.
• et al.

Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink.

Nat. Commun. 2014; 5: 3935

• Kang H.W.
• et al.

A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity.

Nat. Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 312-319

• Daly A.C.
• et al.

A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage.

Biofabrication. 2016; 8045002

• Critchley S.
• et al.

3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects.

Acta Biomater. 2020; 113: 130-143

• de Ruijter M.
• et al.

Simultaneous micropatterning of fibrous meshes and bioinks for the fabrication of living tissue constructs.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019; 8e1800418

• Markstedt K.
• et al.

3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications.

Biomacromolecules. 2015; 16: 1489-1496

• Narayanan L.K.
• et al.

3D-bioprinting of polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber-alginate hydrogel bioink containing human adipose-derived stem cells.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016; 2: 1732-1742

• Izadifar M.
• et al.

UV-Assisted 3D bioprinting of nanoreinforced hybrid cardiac patch for myocardial tissue engineering.

Tissue Eng. C Methods. 2018; 24: 74-88

• Shin S.R.
• et al.

Reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering.

Small. 2016; 12: 3677-3689

• Nadernezhad A.
• et al.

Nanocomposite bioinks based on agarose and 2D nanosilicates with tunable flow properties and bioactivity for 3D bioprinting.

ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. 2019; 2: 796-806

• Wilson S.A.
• et al.

Shear-thinning and thermo-reversible nanoengineered inks for 3D bioprinting.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017; 9: 43449-43458

• Lee M.
• et al.

Exploitation of cationic silica nanoparticles for bioprinting of large-scale constructs with high printing fidelity.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018; 10: 37820-37828

• Hajiali H.
• et al.

Review of emerging nanotechnology in bone regeneration: progress, challenges, and perspectives.

Nanoscale. 2021; 13: 10266-10280

• Hong S.
• et al.

3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures.

Adv. Mater. 2015; 27: 4035-4040

• Wu D.
• et al.

3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity.

Mater. Des. 2018; 160: 486-495

• Ouyang L.
• et al.

3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016; 2: 1743-1751

• Visscher D.O.
• et al.

A photo-crosslinkable cartilage-derived extracellular matrix bioink for auricular cartilage tissue engineering.

Acta Biomater. 2021; 121: 193-203

• Tytgat L.
• et al.

High-resolution 3D bioprinting of photo-cross-linkable recombinant collagen to serve tissue engineering applications.

Biomacromolecules. 2020; 21: 3997-4007

• Wang X.
• et al.

Fabrication of multiple-layered hydrogel scaffolds with elaborate structure and good mechanical properties via 3D printing and ionic reinforcement.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018; 10: 18338-18350

• Hedegaard C.L.
• et al.

Hydrodynamically guided hierarchical self-assembly of peptide-protein bioinks.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018; 281703716

• Wang B.
• et al.

Affinity-bound growth factor within sulfated interpenetrating network bioinks for bioprinting cartilaginous tissues.

Acta Biomater. 2021; 128: 130-142

• Distler T.
• et al.

Mechanical properties of cell- and microgel bead-laden oxidized alginate-gelatin hydrogels.

Biomater. Sci. 2021; 9: 3051-3068

• Diamantides N.
• et al.

High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks.

Biofabrication. 2019; 11045016

• Groll J.
• et al.

A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks.

Biofabrication. 2018; 11013001

• Jeon O.
• et al.

Individual cell-only bioink and photocurable supporting medium for 3D printing and generation of engineered tissues with complex geometries.

Mater. Horiz. 2019; 6: 1625-1631

• Ayan B.
• et al.

Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics.

Sci. Adv. 2020; 6eaaw5111

• Tang S.
• et al.

Dynamic covalent hydrogels as biomaterials to mimic the viscoelasticity of soft tissues.

Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021; 120100738

• Wei Z.
• et al.

Hydrogel network dynamics regulate vascular morphogenesis.

Cell Stem Cell. 2020; 27: 798-812.e796

• Morgan F.L.C.
• et al.

Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020; 9e1901798

• Levato R.
• et al.

From shape to function: the next step in bioprinting.

Adv. Mater. 2020; 32e1906423

• Fu Z.
• et al.

Responsive biomaterials for 3D bioprinting: a review.

Mater. Today. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.001