• Saidulu D.
• et al.

A systematic review of moving bed biofilm reactor, membrane bioreactor, and moving bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: comparison of research trends, removal mechanisms, and performance.

J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021; 9106112

• Jagaba A.H.
• et al.

Sequencing batch reactor technology for landfill leachate treatment: a state-of-the-art review.

J. Environ. Manag. 2021; 282111946

• Zamri M.F.M.A.
• et al.

A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste.

Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021; 137110637

• Vymazal J.
• et al.

Recent research challenges in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a review.

Ecol. Eng. 2021; 169106318

• Magwaza S.T.
• et al.

Hydroponic technology as decentralised system for domestic wastewater treatment and vegetable production in urban agriculture: a review.

Sci. Total Environ. 2020; 698134154

• Ramírez-Vargas C.
• et al.

Microbial electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment: principles and evolution from microbial fuel cells to bioelectrochemical-based constructed wetlands.

Water. 2018; 10: 1128

• Gupta S.
• et al.

A comprehensive review on emerging constructed wetland coupled microbial fuel cell technology: potential applications and challenges.

Bioresour. Technol. 2021; 320124376

• Asif M.B.
• et al.

Electrochemical membrane bioreactors: state-of-the-art and future prospects.

Sci. Total Environ. 2020; 741140233

Integrating bioelectrochemical systems for sustainable wastewater treatment.

Clean Techn. Environ. Policy. 2018; 20: 911-924

• Gupta S.
• et al.

Simultaneous removal of organic matters and nutrients from high-strength wastewater in constructed wetlands followed by entrapped algal systems.

Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020; 27: 1112-1117

• Yadav A.K.
• et al.

Performance assessment of innovative constructed wetland–microbial fuel cell for electricity production and dye removal.

Ecol. Eng. 2012; 47: 126-131

• Jingyu H.
• et al.

Assessing the factors influencing the performance of constructed wetland–microbial fuel cell integration.

Water Sci. Technol. 2020; 81: 631-643

• Venkata Mohan S.
• et al.

Sustainable power generation from floating macrophytes based ecological microenvironment through embedded fuel cells along with simultaneous wastewater treatment.

Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102: 7036-7042

• Chiranjeevi P.
• et al.

Ecologically engineered submerged and emergent macrophyte based system: an integrated eco-electrogenic design for harnessing power with simultaneous wastewater treatment.

Ecol. Eng. 2013; 51: 181-190

• Yeruva D.K.
• et al.

Eco-electrogenic engineered flow through wetland system for tertiary treatment of acidogenic effluents from biohydrogen production.

J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste. 2020; 24: 04020020

• Yadav R.K.
• et al.

Integrated drip hydroponics–microbial fuel cell system for wastewater treatment and resource recovery.

Bioresource Technol. Rep. 2020; 9100392

• Yadav R.K.
• et al.

Performance evaluation of the integrated hydroponics–microbial electrochemical technology (iHydroMET) for decentralized domestic wastewater treatment.

Chemosphere. 2022; 288132514

• Aguirre-Sierra A.
• et al.

Microbial electrochemical systems outperform fixed-bed biofilters in cleaning up urban wastewater.

Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2016; 2: 984-993

• Prado de Nicolás A.
• et al.

Evaluating bioelectrochemically-assisted constructed wetland (METland®) for treating wastewater: analysis of materials, performance and electroactive communities.

Chem. Eng. J. 2022; 440135748

• Ramírez-Vargas C.A.
• et al.

Electroactive biofilm-based constructed wetland (EABB-CW): a mesocosm-scale test of an innovative setup for wastewater treatment.

Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 659: 796-806

• Wang Y.-P.
• et al.

A microbial fuel cell–membrane bioreactor integrated system for cost-effective wastewater treatment.

Appl. Energy. 2012; 98: 230-235

• Yu Z.
• et al.

A review on the applications of microbial electrolysis cells in anaerobic digestion.

Bioresour. Technol. 2018; 255: 340-348

• Clauwaert P.
• et al.

Combining biocatalyzed electrolysis with anaerobic digestion.

Water Sci. Technol. 2008; 57: 575-579

• Hartl M.
• et al.

Contaminants removal and bacterial activity enhancement along the flow path of constructed wetland microbial fuel cells.

Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 652: 1195-1208

• Oodally A.
• et al.

Investigating the performance of constructed wetland microbial fuel cells using three indigenous South African wetland plants.

J. Water Process Eng. 2019; 32100930

• Corbella C.
• et al.

Long-term assessment of best cathode position to maximise microbial fuel cell performance in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands.

Sci. Total Environ. 2016; 563–564: 448-455

• Saeed T.
• Jihad Miah M.

Organic matter and nutrient removal in tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell constructed wetlands: media and flood–dry period ratio.

Chem. Eng. J. 2021; 411128507

• Saeed T.
• et al.

Free-draining two-stage microbial fuel cell integrated constructed wetlands development using biomass, construction, and industrial wastes as filter materials: performance assessment.

Chem. Eng. J. 2022; 437135433

• Saeed T.
• et al.

Influence of electrodes and media saturation in horizontal flow wetlands employed for municipal sewage treatment: a comparative study.

Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022; 25102160

• Fernandez-Gatell M.
• et al.

Microbial activity enhancement in constructed wetlands operated as bioelectrochemical systems.

Chemosphere. 2022; 287132383

• Kumar M.
• Singh R.

Sewage water treatment with energy recovery using constructed wetlands integrated with a bioelectrochemical system.

Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020; 6: 795-808

• Thakur S.
• Das B.

Bio-electrochemical evaluation of two-stage constructed wetland microbial fuel cells with high strength raw domestic wastewater and simultaneous energy recovery.

Water Environ. J. 2021; 35: 1239-1248

• Aguirre-Sierra A.
• et al.

Integrating Microbial Electrochemical Technologies (MET) to Constructed Wetlands to Treat Urban Wastewater from Small Communities: the METland Concept.

in: IWA Specialist Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control. 2018

• Aguirre-Sierra A.
• et al.

A new concept in constructed wetlands: assessment of aerobic electroconductive biofilters.

Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020; 6: 1312-1323

• Prado A.
• et al.

Novel bioelectrochemical strategies for domesticating the electron flow in constructed wetlands.

Sci. Total Environ. 2020; 735139522

• Peñacoba-Antona L.
• et al.

Microbial electrochemically assisted treatment wetlands: current flow density as a performance indicator in real-scale systems in Mediterranean and Northern European locations.

Front. Microbiol. 2022; 13843135

• Chen M.
• et al.

Enhanced removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from real municipal wastewater using an electrochemical membrane bioreactor.

Bioresour. Technol. 2020; 311123579

• Ma J.
• et al.

Long-term investigation of a novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor for low-strength municipal wastewater treatment.

Water Res. 2015; 78: 98-110

• Thakur S.A.
• Khedikar I.P.

Performance evaluation of moving bed bio-film reactor (MBBR) for treatment of domestic wastewater.

Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015; 6: 973-976

• Alagha O.
• et al.

Suitability of SBR for wastewater treatment and reuse: pilot-scale reactor operated in different anoxic conditions.

IJERPH. 2020; 17: 1617

• Estrada-Vázquez C.
• et al.

Parametric optimization of domestic wastewater treatment in an activated sludge sequencing batch reactor using response surface methodology.

J. Environ. Sci. Health A. 2019; 54: 1197-1205

• Kowalski M.S.
• et al.

Effective nitrogen removal in a two-stage partial nitritation-anammox reactor treating municipal wastewater – Piloting PN-MBBR/AMX-IFAS configuration.

Bioresour. Technol. 2019; 289121742

• Luiz de Sousa Rollemberg S.
• et al.

Pilot-scale aerobic granular sludge in the treatment of municipal wastewater: optimizations in the start-up, methodology of sludge discharge, and evaluation of resource recovery.

Bioresour. Technol. 2020; 311123467

• Guo H.
• et al.

Digestibility of waste aerobic granular sludge from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment system.

Water Res. 2020; 173115617

• Molina-Muñoz M.
• et al.

Microbial community structure and dynamics in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor aerobically treating domestic wastewater under real operation conditions.

Sci. Total Environ. 2009; 407: 3994-4003

• Khalifa M.E.
• et al.

Effect of media variation on the removal efficiency of pollutants from domestic wastewater in constructed wetland systems.

Ecol. Eng. 2020; 143105668

• Abdelhakeem S.G.
• et al.

Performance of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland under different operational conditions.

J. Adv. Res. 2016; 7: 803-814

• Shukla R.
• et al.

Performance of horizontal flow constructed wetland for secondary treatment of domestic wastewater in a remote tribal area of Central India.

Sustain. Environ. Res. 2021; 31: 13

• García-Ávila F.
• et al.

Performance of Phragmites australis and Cyperus papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands.

Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2019; 7: 286-296

• Hiegemann H.
• et al.

Performance and inorganic fouling of a submergible 255 L prototype microbial fuel cell module during continuous long-term operation with real municipal wastewater under practical conditions.

Bioresour. Technol. 2019; 294122227

• Rossi R.
• et al.

Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests.

Water Res. 2019; 148: 51-59

• Valladares Linares R.
• et al.

Scale up of microbial fuel cell stack system for residential wastewater treatment in continuous mode operation.

Water. 2019; 11: 217

• Liang P.
• et al.

One-year operation of 1000-L modularized microbial fuel cell for municipal wastewater treatment.

Water Res. 2018; 141: 1-8

• Ge Z.
• He Z.

Long-term performance of a 200 liter modularized microbial fuel cell system treating municipal wastewater: treatment, energy, and cost.

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2016; 2: 274-281

• Blatter M.
• et al.

Stretched 1000-L microbial fuel cell.

J. Power Sources. 2021; 483229130

• Vaillant N.
• et al.

Use of commercial plant species in a hydroponic system to treat domestic wastewaters.

J. Environ. Qual. 2004; 33: 695-702

• Haddad M.
• Mizyed N.

Evaluation of various hydroponic techniques as decentralised wastewater treatment and reuse systems.

Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2011; 68: 461-476

• Feng Q.
• et al.

Influence of the temperature and hydraulic retention time in bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge.

Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2019; 44: 2170-2179

• Xu L.
• et al.

Maximizing the energy harvest from a microbial fuel cell embedded in a constructed wetland.

Appl. Energy. 2018; 214: 83-91

• Longo S.
• et al.

Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement.

Appl. Energy. 2016; 179: 1251-1268