Connect with us

Blockchain

What to Do When You Fall Victim to a Crypto Scam

Avatar

Published

on

What investigators need so they can help recover your funds

The rise of bitcoin doubler scams promoted through prominent social media channels marks a noticeable uptick in crypto scams targeting the general public, many of whom are likely unfamiliar with cryptocurrency or the pervasive nature of these scams. Blockchain analysis and cryptocurrency investigations services like CipherTrace can help these victims obtain the information they need to potentially recover their funds.

Step One to Recovering Your Crypto—Find Your Transaction IDs (TXIDs)

Before investigators can begin tracing your assets, they will need all the transactions IDs identifying the funds you sent to the scammers. These transaction IDs will allow investigators to “follow the money” and see exactly where your coins are moving. While it is still possible to conduct an investigation without transaction IDs, knowing these will expedite any investigation and reduce potential complications.

How to identify a transaction ID

On most blockchains, a transaction ID (TXID) is a unique string of letters and numbers that represent a record of the movement of cryptocurrency from one address to another. This can sometimes be referred to as the transaction hash. This hash identifies the datetime, sending addresses, receiving addresses, transaction amounts, fees, and more. A Bitcoin transaction hash, for example, is displayed as a 65-digit-hexadecimal number, as seen below.

A visual representation of a Bitcoin transaction.

Depending on the exchange or wallet you are using, you may need to dig deeper into your transaction information to find the transaction ID, as demonstrated below.

In order to locate the transaction ID in a BRD wallet, users must click “Show Details” to reveal the additional transactional information.

I can’t find my transaction ID

Not all exchanges and wallets provide TXIDs for you. However, because most blockchains are public, you should still be able to find it yourself through blockchain explorer websites like blockchain.com.

Using bitcoin as an example, start by locating the address you sent your bitcoin to and paste this into the search bar of the blockchain explorer website. This will display all incoming and outgoing transactions to and from that address. To locate your transaction ID, there are two things you should look for:

  • Date/time
  • Amount sent

If the date/time and amount received match with your transaction, then you can identify your transaction ID by locating the hash associated with the transaction, as seen below.

My transaction ID doesn’t match my address when searching on a blockchain explorer

If you believe you have identified your transaction on a blockchain explorer by matching the data/time and transaction amount, but the sending address doesn’t match your sending address, there is no need to panic. If you sent your funds from your account at a cryptocurrency exchange, your deposit address at the exchange will rarely be the same address that is used to conduct outgoing transactions. This is because of the way cryptocurrency exchanges typically group outgoing transactions to maximize cost efficiency. What you are likely seeing is an address associated with one of the exchange’s hot wallets. While funds may appear to be sent and received to your account at an exchange, these systems are typically all internal and do not reflect actual movement on the blockchain. Instead, exchanges commonly move transactions in and out of their hot wallets to best fulfill customer transactions, grouping orders together to minimize the number of outgoing transactions while maximizing cost efficiency in an attempt to keep fees low for users.

The figure above demonstrates how exchanges move funds on the blockchain by grouping outgoing transactions together. For this reason, any funds leaving an exchange are likely to have multiple inputs (sending addresses) and multiple outputs (receiving addresses). If you are sending funds from an exchange, there is no need to be alarmed if you see this type of activity when looking for your address on a blockchain explorer.

Step Two to Recovering Your Crypto—Writing Your Narrative

A clean and concise narrative of your incident will help give your case color, aiding in an investigator’s understanding of the flow of funds. Important information to include in your narrative are:

  • all transaction IDs,
  • where you sent your crypto from (private wallet, account at exchange X, etc.),
  • where you believed you were sending your funds (perpetrator’s private wallet, arbitrage account at XYZ, etc.), and
  • any details regarding the scam and scammers.

Additionally, law enforcement will usually require proof of ownership of the original source of funds. Please ensure that you still have access to any accounts you initially used to send money to the scammers.

Step Three to Recovering Your Crypto—Contacting Investigators

CipherTrace offers two services to the victims of crypto thefts and scams. For larger losses, CipherTrace Professional Services can assist you with every aspect of the recovery, from investigation to helping law enforcement write their subpoenas to testifying in support of our analysis.

Smaller thefts can utilize our Defenders League for pro bono asset recovery support, where our team of investigative interns will supply you with the information law enforcement needs to begin an official investigation.

If you are the victim of a crypto theft or scam, you can contact us here: https://ciphertrace.com/bitcoin-scam-and-theft-asset-recovery/

I was hacked. Do these steps apply to me?

Yes! Investigators will still need the transactions IDs for the hack and a complete narrative to contextualize their trace.

Next Steps—Contacting Law Enforcement and Reporting to IC3

Reporting mechanisms for cyber-crimes such as crypto fraud vary from country to country.

In the United States, you can go to your local police station to lodge a complaint. You can also report the crime to the Internet Crime and Complaint Center (IC3) at https://www.ic3.gov/

In Europe, Europol is a great resource for finding the reporting website of your country: https://www.europol.europa.eu/report-a-crime/report-cybercrime-online. For Member States without a dedicated online option in place, Europol recommends going to your local police station to lodge a complaint.

When it comes to lost cryptocurrencies, the probability of successful asset recovery depends on several factors, including amount lost, obfuscation techniques used, and whether or not the funds have moved to a regulated exchange. While the CipherTrace Defenders League takes on most cases, regardless of the amount of cryptocurrency lost, many law enforcement agencies have value thresholds for investigations. Lodging your complaint with your federal government will increase your chance of asset recovery if a larger investigation is ever opened against your scammer.

Source: https://ciphertrace.com/what-to-do-when-you-fall-victim-to-a-crypto-scam/

Blockchain

Tether (USDT) January 15th Deadline on iFinex Case: Everything You Need to Know

Avatar

Published

on

Many in the cryptocurrency field have recently discussed the upcoming January 15th date as an important consideration for the ongoing case between the office of the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and iFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

With this in mind, below is a comprehensive summary of what happened and what to expect on this date.

The NYAG v. iFinex Case: What Happened?

Back in April 2019, the office of the New York Attorney General alleged that the popular cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex lost $850 million and then used funds from its affiliated stablecoin operator Tether (the company that issues USDT) to cover the shortfall.

As CryptoPotato reported, later on, Tether issued a statement through a blog post which said that the allegations were written in “bad faith” and were also “riddled with false assertions.”

In May 2019, Judge Joel Cohen granted a partial stay on the NYAG office’s request for documents from the two companies until their hearing takes place on July 29th. During that hearing, the judge on the case, Joel Cohen, decided to extend the preliminary injunction as he was not ready to make a final decision on whether the case should go forward or be dismissed. Hence, he extended that injunction by 90 days.

In August, however, the NYAG presented new evidence on the case, alleging that apart from covering up the $850 million, Bitfinex and Tether had served New York customers for longer than they claimed. In part, the document stated:

The OAG has uncovered substantial ties between Respondents and New York concerning Respondents’ corporate operations; trading on the Bitfinex platform; the issuance, redemption, and trading of tethers; use of financial institutions to move money and process customer deposits and withdrawals; and representations to the market that might have been misleading.

Essentially, the NYAG also attacked Bitfinex’s LEO initial exchange offering, claiming that it “has every indicia of a securities issuance subject to the Martin Act, and there is reason to believe that the issuance is related to the matters under investigation,” meaning the alleged cover-up.

Additionally, the NYAG called iFinex’s motion to dismiss “an improper attempt to impede a lawful investigation.”

The Order to Turn in Documents

In September 2020, Judge Cohen ruled that Bitfinex and Tether must turn over documents detailing their financial relationship and history to the NYAG’s office. In addition to that, he also extended an injunction that barred Tether from loaning funds to Bitfinex by 90 more days.

However, on December 9th, 2020, Letitia James, the Attorney General, filed a document, asking Justice Cohen to extend the deadline to January 15th, 2021. James said that “the parties continue to cooperate on the production of documents in response to the 354 Order, and anticipate that the production could be finalized in the coming weeks.”

Why the January 15th Deadline is Important?

With this, we arrive at the time of this writing and the importance of the January 15th deadline. There are a few reasons for which this is a critical point in this case. First, it requires that iFinex produces the necessary information for the NYAG to continue its investigation and to further substantiate the merits of its claims.

And perhaps what’s even more important, however, is the nature of the documentation. In essence, iFinex has to produce materials on the process by which they determine whether, when, and how to issue and redeem tethers, banks, documents, and communications regarding specific issuances and redemptions, as well as trading activity on the Bitfinex trading platform regarding tethers and bitcoin.

This is a landmark case for the entire cryptocurrency space as USDT is the most popular and biggest stablecoin on the market. The company issuing it has been involved in many scandals in the past, with many questioning the fact that it’s actually backed by USD.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this link to register & get 10% off fees and 50 USDT when trading 500 USDT (limited offer).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter CRYPTOPOTATO35 code to get 35% free bonus on any deposit up to 1 BTC.

Source: https://coingenius.news/tether-usdt-january-15th-deadline-on-ifinex-case-everything-you-need-to-know-28/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Following Coinbase And Bakkt: Winklevoss’ Gemini Reportedly Considers Going Public

Avatar

Published

on

Many in the cryptocurrency field have recently discussed the upcoming January 15th date as an important consideration for the ongoing case between the office of the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and iFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

With this in mind, below is a comprehensive summary of what happened and what to expect on this date.

The NYAG v. iFinex Case: What Happened?

Back in April 2019, the office of the New York Attorney General alleged that the popular cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex lost $850 million and then used funds from its affiliated stablecoin operator Tether (the company that issues USDT) to cover the shortfall.

As CryptoPotato reported, later on, Tether issued a statement through a blog post which said that the allegations were written in “bad faith” and were also “riddled with false assertions.”

In May 2019, Judge Joel Cohen granted a partial stay on the NYAG office’s request for documents from the two companies until their hearing takes place on July 29th. During that hearing, the judge on the case, Joel Cohen, decided to extend the preliminary injunction as he was not ready to make a final decision on whether the case should go forward or be dismissed. Hence, he extended that injunction by 90 days.

In August, however, the NYAG presented new evidence on the case, alleging that apart from covering up the $850 million, Bitfinex and Tether had served New York customers for longer than they claimed. In part, the document stated:

The OAG has uncovered substantial ties between Respondents and New York concerning Respondents’ corporate operations; trading on the Bitfinex platform; the issuance, redemption, and trading of tethers; use of financial institutions to move money and process customer deposits and withdrawals; and representations to the market that might have been misleading.

Essentially, the NYAG also attacked Bitfinex’s LEO initial exchange offering, claiming that it “has every indicia of a securities issuance subject to the Martin Act, and there is reason to believe that the issuance is related to the matters under investigation,” meaning the alleged cover-up.

Additionally, the NYAG called iFinex’s motion to dismiss “an improper attempt to impede a lawful investigation.”

The Order to Turn in Documents

In September 2020, Judge Cohen ruled that Bitfinex and Tether must turn over documents detailing their financial relationship and history to the NYAG’s office. In addition to that, he also extended an injunction that barred Tether from loaning funds to Bitfinex by 90 more days.

However, on December 9th, 2020, Letitia James, the Attorney General, filed a document, asking Justice Cohen to extend the deadline to January 15th, 2021. James said that “the parties continue to cooperate on the production of documents in response to the 354 Order, and anticipate that the production could be finalized in the coming weeks.”

Why the January 15th Deadline is Important?

With this, we arrive at the time of this writing and the importance of the January 15th deadline. There are a few reasons for which this is a critical point in this case. First, it requires that iFinex produces the necessary information for the NYAG to continue its investigation and to further substantiate the merits of its claims.

And perhaps what’s even more important, however, is the nature of the documentation. In essence, iFinex has to produce materials on the process by which they determine whether, when, and how to issue and redeem tethers, banks, documents, and communications regarding specific issuances and redemptions, as well as trading activity on the Bitfinex trading platform regarding tethers and bitcoin.

This is a landmark case for the entire cryptocurrency space as USDT is the most popular and biggest stablecoin on the market. The company issuing it has been involved in many scandals in the past, with many questioning the fact that it’s actually backed by USD.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this link to register & get 10% off fees and 50 USDT when trading 500 USDT (limited offer).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter CRYPTOPOTATO35 code to get 35% free bonus on any deposit up to 1 BTC.

Source: https://coingenius.news/following-coinbase-and-bakkt-winklevoss-gemini-reportedly-considers-going-public-26/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

FinCEN Extends Comment Window on Proposed Crypto Regulations

Avatar

Published

on

Many in the cryptocurrency field have recently discussed the upcoming January 15th date as an important consideration for the ongoing case between the office of the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and iFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

With this in mind, below is a comprehensive summary of what happened and what to expect on this date.

The NYAG v. iFinex Case: What Happened?

Back in April 2019, the office of the New York Attorney General alleged that the popular cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex lost $850 million and then used funds from its affiliated stablecoin operator Tether (the company that issues USDT) to cover the shortfall.

As CryptoPotato reported, later on, Tether issued a statement through a blog post which said that the allegations were written in “bad faith” and were also “riddled with false assertions.”

In May 2019, Judge Joel Cohen granted a partial stay on the NYAG office’s request for documents from the two companies until their hearing takes place on July 29th. During that hearing, the judge on the case, Joel Cohen, decided to extend the preliminary injunction as he was not ready to make a final decision on whether the case should go forward or be dismissed. Hence, he extended that injunction by 90 days.

In August, however, the NYAG presented new evidence on the case, alleging that apart from covering up the $850 million, Bitfinex and Tether had served New York customers for longer than they claimed. In part, the document stated:

The OAG has uncovered substantial ties between Respondents and New York concerning Respondents’ corporate operations; trading on the Bitfinex platform; the issuance, redemption, and trading of tethers; use of financial institutions to move money and process customer deposits and withdrawals; and representations to the market that might have been misleading.

Essentially, the NYAG also attacked Bitfinex’s LEO initial exchange offering, claiming that it “has every indicia of a securities issuance subject to the Martin Act, and there is reason to believe that the issuance is related to the matters under investigation,” meaning the alleged cover-up.

Additionally, the NYAG called iFinex’s motion to dismiss “an improper attempt to impede a lawful investigation.”

The Order to Turn in Documents

In September 2020, Judge Cohen ruled that Bitfinex and Tether must turn over documents detailing their financial relationship and history to the NYAG’s office. In addition to that, he also extended an injunction that barred Tether from loaning funds to Bitfinex by 90 more days.

However, on December 9th, 2020, Letitia James, the Attorney General, filed a document, asking Justice Cohen to extend the deadline to January 15th, 2021. James said that “the parties continue to cooperate on the production of documents in response to the 354 Order, and anticipate that the production could be finalized in the coming weeks.”

Why the January 15th Deadline is Important?

With this, we arrive at the time of this writing and the importance of the January 15th deadline. There are a few reasons for which this is a critical point in this case. First, it requires that iFinex produces the necessary information for the NYAG to continue its investigation and to further substantiate the merits of its claims.

And perhaps what’s even more important, however, is the nature of the documentation. In essence, iFinex has to produce materials on the process by which they determine whether, when, and how to issue and redeem tethers, banks, documents, and communications regarding specific issuances and redemptions, as well as trading activity on the Bitfinex trading platform regarding tethers and bitcoin.

This is a landmark case for the entire cryptocurrency space as USDT is the most popular and biggest stablecoin on the market. The company issuing it has been involved in many scandals in the past, with many questioning the fact that it’s actually backed by USD.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this link to register & get 10% off fees and 50 USDT when trading 500 USDT (limited offer).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter CRYPTOPOTATO35 code to get 35% free bonus on any deposit up to 1 BTC.

Source: https://coingenius.news/fincen-extends-comment-window-on-proposed-crypto-regulations-20/

Continue Reading

Blockchain

Bulgarian Crypto Exchange Owner Sentenced To 10 Years in Prison for Laundering $5 Million

Avatar

Published

on

Many in the cryptocurrency field have recently discussed the upcoming January 15th date as an important consideration for the ongoing case between the office of the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and iFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

With this in mind, below is a comprehensive summary of what happened and what to expect on this date.

The NYAG v. iFinex Case: What Happened?

Back in April 2019, the office of the New York Attorney General alleged that the popular cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex lost $850 million and then used funds from its affiliated stablecoin operator Tether (the company that issues USDT) to cover the shortfall.

As CryptoPotato reported, later on, Tether issued a statement through a blog post which said that the allegations were written in “bad faith” and were also “riddled with false assertions.”

In May 2019, Judge Joel Cohen granted a partial stay on the NYAG office’s request for documents from the two companies until their hearing takes place on July 29th. During that hearing, the judge on the case, Joel Cohen, decided to extend the preliminary injunction as he was not ready to make a final decision on whether the case should go forward or be dismissed. Hence, he extended that injunction by 90 days.

In August, however, the NYAG presented new evidence on the case, alleging that apart from covering up the $850 million, Bitfinex and Tether had served New York customers for longer than they claimed. In part, the document stated:

The OAG has uncovered substantial ties between Respondents and New York concerning Respondents’ corporate operations; trading on the Bitfinex platform; the issuance, redemption, and trading of tethers; use of financial institutions to move money and process customer deposits and withdrawals; and representations to the market that might have been misleading.

Essentially, the NYAG also attacked Bitfinex’s LEO initial exchange offering, claiming that it “has every indicia of a securities issuance subject to the Martin Act, and there is reason to believe that the issuance is related to the matters under investigation,” meaning the alleged cover-up.

Additionally, the NYAG called iFinex’s motion to dismiss “an improper attempt to impede a lawful investigation.”

The Order to Turn in Documents

In September 2020, Judge Cohen ruled that Bitfinex and Tether must turn over documents detailing their financial relationship and history to the NYAG’s office. In addition to that, he also extended an injunction that barred Tether from loaning funds to Bitfinex by 90 more days.

However, on December 9th, 2020, Letitia James, the Attorney General, filed a document, asking Justice Cohen to extend the deadline to January 15th, 2021. James said that “the parties continue to cooperate on the production of documents in response to the 354 Order, and anticipate that the production could be finalized in the coming weeks.”

Why the January 15th Deadline is Important?

With this, we arrive at the time of this writing and the importance of the January 15th deadline. There are a few reasons for which this is a critical point in this case. First, it requires that iFinex produces the necessary information for the NYAG to continue its investigation and to further substantiate the merits of its claims.

And perhaps what’s even more important, however, is the nature of the documentation. In essence, iFinex has to produce materials on the process by which they determine whether, when, and how to issue and redeem tethers, banks, documents, and communications regarding specific issuances and redemptions, as well as trading activity on the Bitfinex trading platform regarding tethers and bitcoin.

This is a landmark case for the entire cryptocurrency space as USDT is the most popular and biggest stablecoin on the market. The company issuing it has been involved in many scandals in the past, with many questioning the fact that it’s actually backed by USD.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this link to register & get 10% off fees and 50 USDT when trading 500 USDT (limited offer).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter CRYPTOPOTATO35 code to get 35% free bonus on any deposit up to 1 BTC.

Source: https://coingenius.news/bulgarian-crypto-exchange-owner-sentenced-to-10-years-in-prison-for-laundering-5-million-17/

Continue Reading
SPACS2 hours ago

Affinity Gaming’s SPAC Gaming & Hospitality Acquisition files for a $150 million IPO

NEWATLAS4 hours ago

NASA takes delivery of Orion Artemis I spacecraft

Cyber Security7 hours ago

Tractors, Pod Ice Cream and Lipstick Awarded CES 2021 Worst in Show

Cyber Security8 hours ago

Microsoft Implements Windows Zerologon Flaw ‘Enforcement Mode’

NEWATLAS9 hours ago

Snoek may just be the fastest velomobile you can buy

Amb Crypto9 hours ago

What explains Tether’s $25B market cap push?

Amb Crypto10 hours ago

How are Chainlink’s whales propping up its price?

Amb Crypto10 hours ago

NavCoin releases its new privacy protocol, one day after Binance adds NAV to its staking program

Amb Crypto10 hours ago

Ethereum, Dogecoin, Maker Price Analysis: 15 January

Amb Crypto11 hours ago

Yearn Finance proposal to mint 1000 YFI tokens to reward core devs faces opposition

Cannabis11 hours ago

Subversive Capital Acquisition Corp. Closes The Largest Cannabis SPAC In History

NEWATLAS12 hours ago

Not-so-solitary electric eels observed hunting in packs

Quantum12 hours ago

Electronic nose sniffs out cooked chicken, chilli spices up solar cells, PhD theses for sale on Amazon

NEWATLAS12 hours ago

Fender celebrates its 75th year with special edition guitars and basses

Cyber Security12 hours ago

Apple Kills MacOS Feature Allowing Apps to Bypass Firewalls

NEWATLAS13 hours ago

Italian superyacht designers unveil solar-powered amphibious catamaran

Cyber Security13 hours ago

Google Boots 164 Apps from Play Marketplace for Shady Ad Practices

NEWATLAS14 hours ago

High Line expansion will take more feet off busy New York streets

Aviation15 hours ago

Virgin Atlantic Completes Sale Of 2 Boeing 787s For Leaseback

CNBC15 hours ago

Apple will produce Ridley Scott’s upcoming Napoleon biopic

Business Insider15 hours ago

New Launched CBD Oil: MF Doom CBD Oil, Rejuv Boost CBD Oil, Humboldt CBD Oil User List

Business Insider15 hours ago

Dogness (International) Corporation Announces Entry into Agreement for Registered Direct Placement of $7.4 Million Common Shares and Warrants

Business Insider15 hours ago

Outlook on the PSRAM Global Market to 2025 – Featuring Fujitsu, Integrated Silicon Solutions and Micron Technology Among Others

Business Insider15 hours ago

S&P Global Ratings Drives Digital-First Access to Debt Markets with Ratings360®

Business Insider15 hours ago

5W Public Relations Welcomes St. Moriz, UK’s Leading Self-Tanning Brand, to Roster of Beauty Clients

Techcrunch15 hours ago

Apple said to be planning new 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pros with MagSafe and Apple processors

Entrepreneur15 hours ago

Want a job in tech? Flockjay pitches its sales training service as an on-ramp to tech careers

SPAC Insiders15 hours ago

Group Nine Acquisition Corp. (GNACU) Prices $200M IPO

Aviation15 hours ago

Why Does The Boeing 737 MAX Have Split Winglets?

CNBC15 hours ago

Google’s Android and TV leads chat Samsung, RCS and CES

Trending