Connect with us

Blockchain

What Actually is Programmable Money?

Published

on

Everyone seems to be interested in programmable money (and assets), but what exactly does this mean? This post explores the concept of programmable money – what is possible today, and what is possible with the help of smart contracts on blockchains.

Is it automated payments?

  • If I click on “make a payment” in my bank’s online banking website, and the bank’s computers move the money, is this programmable money?
  • If I run an app on my computer which does some stuff then logs in to my bank’s online banking website and clicks on “make a payment”, is this programmable money?
  • What if my program does the same thing using the bank’s API?

It feels like simply instructing a bank to make a payment doesn’t count as programmable money, whether that instruction comes from a human or a computer program. Here’s a primer on how payments are made today.

This means that programmable money can’t just be the ability to write arbitrary code that can move money. Even if it includes complex business logic and external data as part of the decision making. Because businesses already do this today: payment instructions sent to banks typically come from computer programs running on corporate servers.

So is it more to do with automation of payments at the bank’s side (as opposed to on the customer’s side)?

  • If I instruct my bank to make an automated monthly payment of $4,000 to my landlord, is that programmable money?
  • If I authorise a utilities provider (eg electricity, gas, phone etc) to take different amounts of money from my bank account every month, is that programmable money?
  • What about if I upload a file to my bank to pay 350 staff their monthly salary, is that programmability? (This is how payroll works; you don’t usually have someone manually typing in each and every payment)

Well, we have all of this already. Banks already perform client-instructed automated tasks, with rudimentary if/then logic:

IF it's the first day of the month THEN pay rent UNLESS I don't have enough money THEN don't make the payment AND send a notification AND charge a fee.

If banks saw demand, I suppose they could let you upload code, and they would run the code, and they would treat the result of the code as a payment instruction from you. But the result is no different to if you ran your own code then instructed the bank, as discussed earlier. And this would create liability headaches for the banks if and when the code goes wrong…

If not automated payments then what?

Well, in each of the above cases, of course the bank could actually hold back the payment, even after they have received the payment instruction. (And in many cases they are required by regulators to not tell customers why they have withheld the payment!)

So you are not guaranteed that the payment will work end to end.

Does programmable money mean that no matter what, the code’s instructions will be carried out, and no bank or intermediary can stop it?

If that’s the aim, then this can only happen if customers can hold and control money (or something representing money) outside of the banking system.

Stablecoins, on a public or permissioned ledger, get us closer. You can upload programs called smart contracts that are guaranteed to run. But even these smart contracts result in an instruction to the smart contract that defines the money. And the smart contract that defines the money can decide not to make the payment, for example if the payment instruction is to a blacklisted account.

It’s designer money

I think then the answer is designer money. Money that is created by someone – an issuer – that behaves a certain way, and has certain constraints no matter who “owns” it at any point in time.

Banks can’t do this, because money in banks is all different. My USD at Citibank is different to your USD at JP Morgan. It’s different in two ways:

  1. My Citibank-dollars are controlled by Citibank, and your JP Morgan-dollars are controlled by JP Morgan. This means if the money should behave a certain way, both banks have to implement exactly the same logic and constraints.
  2. My Citibank-dollars are legally, and practically, a different instrument to your JP Morgan-dollars. My Citibank-dollars are a legal agreement that Citibank owes me dollars; your JP Morgan-dollars are a legal agreement that JP Morgan owes you dollars.

The result is that money, controlled by all of these different entities, is all different and behaves in different ways. Think how hard it is to implement anti-money-laundering rules across the board. Every participant has to attempt to apply the same logic. Every. Single. Participant. No wonder it’s ridiculously expensive, and has many gaps.

Why is this the case? It’s because there is no ledger for money that can be referenced to while transactions are made.

Problems today

  • Money that was intended for some specific thing ends up somewhere else (corruption).
  • Loans can be spent on items other than what the borrower told their lender they would use it for (fraud).
  • Grants can be used to pay for things the grant was not intended for (misuse, corruption, or fraud).

Benefits of designer money

Now you can create money where the money itself has control logic built into it. This is done at the smart contract level. A smart contract is typically a bunch of code that is run by all participants in a blockchain network. It that defines:

  1. The characteristics of the money (how many units there are, who initially owns it, etc)
  2. How users can interact with the money (ask for a balance, make a payment, etc).

The constraints are coded into the second part of the smart contract, so that all payment requests are subject to those constraints – no matter who is in control of the money at the time.

In this way, money can only go to intended destinations. Once this special purpose money has arrived at the destination, it can be “redeemed” for general purpose money, if needed. (As analogy, think about how food stamps work)

You can create certain types of money that can’t be sent without additional data, eg proof that the payment is to support an export or import.

You can even put constraints on wallet balances or money flows. For example a recipient’s balance can’t exceed $2,500, or any payment can only be made up to $50, or any account can only send or receive a total of $1,500 per day, or whatever.

With designer money, the possibilities are practically endless. Yes, special purpose money reduces the ‘fungability’ of money, but that’s the point. There are so many cases today where money has special uses and should not be fungible with general purpose money, but the current system messes this up.

During Covid-19, governments are experimenting with grants that should only be spent in certain ways. Blockchains provide a platform for building designer money in a repeatable and scalable way.

What do you think? What’s your definition of programmable money?

Note: Special thanks to Henning Diedrich, author of “Ethereum: Blockchains, Digital Assets, Smart Contracts, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations” for feedback and inputs on this piece.

Source: https://bitsonblocks.net/2020/04/26/what-actually-is-programmable-money/

Blockchain

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

The SEC has delayed another Bitcoin ETF hopeful this week, this time pushing the deadline back until as late as August.

Published

on

In brief

  • The SEC has again delayed the VanEck Bitcoin Trust filing, this time asking the public several key questions about the market.
  • An approved Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as a key milestone for the leading cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on VanEck’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. 

This is the second time this week that the Commission has pushed back a decision on a Bitcoin ETF. On June 15, the SEC postponed its decision on Kryptoin’s ETF filing.

The SEC has yet to approve any Bitcoin ETF, with chairpeople frequently citing manipulation and a lack of transparency in the crypto market as key reasons. A Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as crucial for the continued acceptance of the asset class. It would offer traditional investors less familiar with cryptocurrencies a regulated and conventional means of gaining exposure to Bitcoin. 

On this occasion, the SEC has also asked the public to comment on several key questions related to the VanEck filing. 

The Commission asks whether the filing would be vulnerable to manipulation; if the public believes the cryptocurrency industry has changed since 2016; if VanEck’s filing has curtailed any possibility of manipulation; and if Bitcoin is transparent.

The public has the next 20 days to file any comments on the above. Commenters can make submissions electronically via the Commission’s portal. Post and email are also accepted means, according to the SEC.

VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF journey

VanEck’s first filing came in June 2018 with its VanEck SolidX Bitcoin trust. The company eventually withdrew this filing in September 2019. 

The New York-based investment manager refiled a new application in December 2020, called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. In March 2021, VanEck then proposed an amendment to the filing. 

The SEC delayed this filing in April 2021, according to a statement from the Commission. Yesterday’s announcement is the second delay of the same filing.

The VanEck Bitcoin Trust would trade shares that reflect the performance of the MVIS CryptoCompare Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. This rate is a U.S. dollar value that tracks the median price of Bitcoin across five exchanges. These kinds of price aggregators are often used whenever a fund manager or exchange is looking to build a financial product and needs a reliable price tracker. 

Shares of the trust would trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, according to the filing. The filing did not cite a specific custodian that would hold the underlying Bitcoin in the Trust. 

Though many have said 2021 would be the year the SEC approves a Bitcoin ETF, the Commission continues to proceed with extreme caution. 

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Coinsmart. Beste Bitcoin-Börse in Europa
Source: https://decrypt.co/73817/sec-delays-vaneck-bitcoin-etf-application-again

Continue Reading

Blockchain

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

The SEC has delayed another Bitcoin ETF hopeful this week, this time pushing the deadline back until as late as August.

Published

on

In brief

  • The SEC has again delayed the VanEck Bitcoin Trust filing, this time asking the public several key questions about the market.
  • An approved Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as a key milestone for the leading cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on VanEck’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. 

This is the second time this week that the Commission has pushed back a decision on a Bitcoin ETF. On June 15, the SEC postponed its decision on Kryptoin’s ETF filing.

The SEC has yet to approve any Bitcoin ETF, with chairpeople frequently citing manipulation and a lack of transparency in the crypto market as key reasons. A Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as crucial for the continued acceptance of the asset class. It would offer traditional investors less familiar with cryptocurrencies a regulated and conventional means of gaining exposure to Bitcoin. 

On this occasion, the SEC has also asked the public to comment on several key questions related to the VanEck filing. 

The Commission asks whether the filing would be vulnerable to manipulation; if the public believes the cryptocurrency industry has changed since 2016; if VanEck’s filing has curtailed any possibility of manipulation; and if Bitcoin is transparent.

The public has the next 20 days to file any comments on the above. Commenters can make submissions electronically via the Commission’s portal. Post and email are also accepted means, according to the SEC.

VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF journey

VanEck’s first filing came in June 2018 with its VanEck SolidX Bitcoin trust. The company eventually withdrew this filing in September 2019. 

The New York-based investment manager refiled a new application in December 2020, called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. In March 2021, VanEck then proposed an amendment to the filing. 

The SEC delayed this filing in April 2021, according to a statement from the Commission. Yesterday’s announcement is the second delay of the same filing.

The VanEck Bitcoin Trust would trade shares that reflect the performance of the MVIS CryptoCompare Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. This rate is a U.S. dollar value that tracks the median price of Bitcoin across five exchanges. These kinds of price aggregators are often used whenever a fund manager or exchange is looking to build a financial product and needs a reliable price tracker. 

Shares of the trust would trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, according to the filing. The filing did not cite a specific custodian that would hold the underlying Bitcoin in the Trust. 

Though many have said 2021 would be the year the SEC approves a Bitcoin ETF, the Commission continues to proceed with extreme caution. 

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Coinsmart. Beste Bitcoin-Börse in Europa
Source: https://decrypt.co/73817/sec-delays-vaneck-bitcoin-etf-application-again

Continue Reading

Blockchain

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

The SEC has delayed another Bitcoin ETF hopeful this week, this time pushing the deadline back until as late as August.

Published

on

In brief

  • The SEC has again delayed the VanEck Bitcoin Trust filing, this time asking the public several key questions about the market.
  • An approved Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as a key milestone for the leading cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on VanEck’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. 

This is the second time this week that the Commission has pushed back a decision on a Bitcoin ETF. On June 15, the SEC postponed its decision on Kryptoin’s ETF filing.

The SEC has yet to approve any Bitcoin ETF, with chairpeople frequently citing manipulation and a lack of transparency in the crypto market as key reasons. A Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as crucial for the continued acceptance of the asset class. It would offer traditional investors less familiar with cryptocurrencies a regulated and conventional means of gaining exposure to Bitcoin. 

On this occasion, the SEC has also asked the public to comment on several key questions related to the VanEck filing. 

The Commission asks whether the filing would be vulnerable to manipulation; if the public believes the cryptocurrency industry has changed since 2016; if VanEck’s filing has curtailed any possibility of manipulation; and if Bitcoin is transparent.

The public has the next 20 days to file any comments on the above. Commenters can make submissions electronically via the Commission’s portal. Post and email are also accepted means, according to the SEC.

VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF journey

VanEck’s first filing came in June 2018 with its VanEck SolidX Bitcoin trust. The company eventually withdrew this filing in September 2019. 

The New York-based investment manager refiled a new application in December 2020, called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. In March 2021, VanEck then proposed an amendment to the filing. 

The SEC delayed this filing in April 2021, according to a statement from the Commission. Yesterday’s announcement is the second delay of the same filing.

The VanEck Bitcoin Trust would trade shares that reflect the performance of the MVIS CryptoCompare Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. This rate is a U.S. dollar value that tracks the median price of Bitcoin across five exchanges. These kinds of price aggregators are often used whenever a fund manager or exchange is looking to build a financial product and needs a reliable price tracker. 

Shares of the trust would trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, according to the filing. The filing did not cite a specific custodian that would hold the underlying Bitcoin in the Trust. 

Though many have said 2021 would be the year the SEC approves a Bitcoin ETF, the Commission continues to proceed with extreme caution. 

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Coinsmart. Beste Bitcoin-Börse in Europa
Source: https://decrypt.co/73817/sec-delays-vaneck-bitcoin-etf-application-again

Continue Reading

Blockchain

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

The SEC has delayed another Bitcoin ETF hopeful this week, this time pushing the deadline back until as late as August.

Published

on

In brief

  • The SEC has again delayed the VanEck Bitcoin Trust filing, this time asking the public several key questions about the market.
  • An approved Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as a key milestone for the leading cryptocurrency.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on VanEck’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. 

This is the second time this week that the Commission has pushed back a decision on a Bitcoin ETF. On June 15, the SEC postponed its decision on Kryptoin’s ETF filing.

The SEC has yet to approve any Bitcoin ETF, with chairpeople frequently citing manipulation and a lack of transparency in the crypto market as key reasons. A Bitcoin ETF has been heralded as crucial for the continued acceptance of the asset class. It would offer traditional investors less familiar with cryptocurrencies a regulated and conventional means of gaining exposure to Bitcoin. 

On this occasion, the SEC has also asked the public to comment on several key questions related to the VanEck filing. 

The Commission asks whether the filing would be vulnerable to manipulation; if the public believes the cryptocurrency industry has changed since 2016; if VanEck’s filing has curtailed any possibility of manipulation; and if Bitcoin is transparent.

The public has the next 20 days to file any comments on the above. Commenters can make submissions electronically via the Commission’s portal. Post and email are also accepted means, according to the SEC.

VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF journey

VanEck’s first filing came in June 2018 with its VanEck SolidX Bitcoin trust. The company eventually withdrew this filing in September 2019. 

The New York-based investment manager refiled a new application in December 2020, called the VanEck Bitcoin Trust. In March 2021, VanEck then proposed an amendment to the filing. 

The SEC delayed this filing in April 2021, according to a statement from the Commission. Yesterday’s announcement is the second delay of the same filing.

The VanEck Bitcoin Trust would trade shares that reflect the performance of the MVIS CryptoCompare Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. This rate is a U.S. dollar value that tracks the median price of Bitcoin across five exchanges. These kinds of price aggregators are often used whenever a fund manager or exchange is looking to build a financial product and needs a reliable price tracker. 

Shares of the trust would trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, according to the filing. The filing did not cite a specific custodian that would hold the underlying Bitcoin in the Trust. 

Though many have said 2021 would be the year the SEC approves a Bitcoin ETF, the Commission continues to proceed with extreme caution. 

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Coinsmart. Beste Bitcoin-Börse in Europa
Source: https://decrypt.co/73817/sec-delays-vaneck-bitcoin-etf-application-again

Continue Reading
ACN Newswire23 mins ago

Singapore’s Commodities Intelligence Centre Signs Investment Agreement to Establish Its Overseas Digital Trade Platform in Chongqing’s Guoyuan Port

Blockchain24 mins ago

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

Blockchain24 mins ago

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

Blockchain24 mins ago

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

Blockchain24 mins ago

SEC Delays VanEck Bitcoin ETF Application—Again

HRTech25 mins ago

Lockdown ease delay: 5 final preparations to make this month

Blockchain27 mins ago

Top Economist Steve Hanke Calls El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption Decision Stupid

Blockchain27 mins ago

Top Economist Steve Hanke Calls El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption Decision Stupid

Blockchain27 mins ago

Top Economist Steve Hanke Calls El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption Decision Stupid

HRTech28 mins ago

Employers not doing enough to nurture female talent

Blockchain28 mins ago

Top Economist Steve Hanke Calls El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption Decision Stupid

Blockchain28 mins ago

World Bank Shuns El Salvador Bitcoin Adoption Plan

Blockchain28 mins ago

World Bank Shuns El Salvador Bitcoin Adoption Plan

Blockchain28 mins ago

World Bank Shuns El Salvador Bitcoin Adoption Plan

Blockchain29 mins ago

World Bank Shuns El Salvador Bitcoin Adoption Plan

Blockchain29 mins ago

John McAfee Admits His Cryptocurrency Fortune is Gone but He Regrets Nothing

Blockchain29 mins ago

John McAfee Admits His Cryptocurrency Fortune is Gone but He Regrets Nothing

Blockchain29 mins ago

John McAfee Admits His Cryptocurrency Fortune is Gone but He Regrets Nothing

Blockchain30 mins ago

John McAfee Admits His Cryptocurrency Fortune is Gone but He Regrets Nothing

HRTech30 mins ago

A year in lockdown: How employee benefits have changed

Blockchain30 mins ago

DAO1 Announces the First Edition of its International Blockchain Hackathon

Blockchain30 mins ago

DAO1 Announces the First Edition of its International Blockchain Hackathon

Blockchain30 mins ago

DAO1 Announces the First Edition of its International Blockchain Hackathon

Blockchain31 mins ago

DAO1 Announces the First Edition of its International Blockchain Hackathon

Blockchain31 mins ago

Ethereum Layer 2 Protocol Metis Launched its Second Testnet

Blockchain31 mins ago

Ethereum Layer 2 Protocol Metis Launched its Second Testnet

Blockchain31 mins ago

Ethereum Layer 2 Protocol Metis Launched its Second Testnet

Blockchain31 mins ago

GMO Enters NFT Business Forming a New Joint Venture

Blockchain31 mins ago

GMO Enters NFT Business Forming a New Joint Venture

Blockchain31 mins ago

GMO Enters NFT Business Forming a New Joint Venture

Trending