IPAB Ziyareti ve Ötesi - Coğrafi İşaretler

Hindistan Cumhurbaşkanı 2021 Nisan 2021'de “Mahkemelerin Reformları (Rasyonalizasyon ve Hizmet Koşulları) XNUMX Yönetmeliği” ni ilan etti. Bu Kararname, aşağıdaki kanunlara göre kurulan çeşitli mahkemeleri kaldırır:

• SİNEMATOGRAF YASASI, 1952
• TELİF HAKKI KANUNU, 1957
• GÜMRÜK KANUNU, 1962
• PATENTLER YASASI, 1970
• HİNDİSTAN KANUNU HAVAALANI KURUMU, 1994
• TİCARET MARKS YASASI, 1999
• MALLARIN COĞRAFİ İŞARETLERİ (KAYIT VE KORUMA) KANUNU, 1999
• BİTKİ ÇEŞİTLERİNİN VE ÇİFTÇİLERİN HAKLARININ KORUNMASI KANUNU, 2001
• ULUSAL KARAYOLLARININ KONTROLÜ (KARA VE TRAFİK) KANUNU, 2002
• FINANCE ACT, 2017

Fikri Mülkiyet Temyiz Kurulu (IPAB), Tescil Memurunun 15 Ticari Markalar Yasası ve Malların Coğrafi İşaretleri (Tescil ve Koruma) Yasası, 2003 kapsamındaki kararlarına karşı itirazları dinlemek için 1999 Eylül 1999 tarihinde Merkezi hükümetin bir gazete bildirimiyle oluşturulmuştur. Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanlığı'nın Patent Kanunu ile ilgili olarak yayınladığı 2007 bildirimleri, 1970 yılında Yüksek Mahkemelerden Temyiz yetkisini IPAB'ye devretti. Daha sonra 2017'de, Finans Yasası 160 (a) ve 160 (c) bölümlerine göre IPAB'ye 1957 Telif Hakkı Yasası kapsamındaki konularda Temyiz yetkisi verdi. 59 Bitki Çeşitleri ve Çiftçiler Yasası, IPAB'ye Yasanın 2001. maddesine göre temyiz yetkisini kullanma yetkisi veriyor.

Tarafından Getirilen Değişiklikler The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021 to the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999

As per omitted Section 2 (1) (a) of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act 1999, Appellate Board for the purposes of this act means the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) established under Section 83 of the Trade Marks Act 1999. With the passing of The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions Of Service) Ordinance 2021, the IPAB stands abolished, and the powers of the IPAB under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act 1999, have been transferred to the Registrar of Geographical Indications and High Courts.

 Powers Conferred to the Registrar of Geographical Indications and the High Court

• The Registrar or the High Court may deem a geographical indication to be on the register, even after removal of the geographical indication from the register for failure to pay the renewal fee.
• Mağdur olan herhangi bir kişinin başvurusu üzerine kaydı değiştirmek ve kaydı düzeltmek.
• To admit evidence in any proceedings, of the usages of the trade concerned and any relevant geographical indication used by other persons.

1. Effect of removal from register for failure to pay fee for renewal to the satisfaction of the Registrar or the High Court

In the cases where a Geographical Indication has been removed from the register for failure to pay the renewal fee, it shall nevertheless, for the purpose of any application for the registration of another Geographical Indication during one year next after the date of the removal, be deemed to a Geographical Indication already on the register. the Registrar or the High Court may not deem such geographical indication as already on the register if it is satisfied that there has been no bona fide trade use of the existing Geographical Indication for preceding two years, or there would be no deception caused with the use of the new Geographical Indication applied for. (section 19)

2. Power of the Registrar and the High Court to vary registration and rectify the register

The Registrar or the High Court may on an application made to it in the prescribed manner, by any person aggrieved, make such order as it may think fit for cancelling or varying the registration of a Geographical Indication on the ground of any contravention, or failure to observe a condition entered on the registered in relation thereto. And the Registrar or the High Court may order making of any entry wrongly omitted, expunging any wrong entry or varying any error or defect in the register, on an application by any aggrieved person. According to old section 27 this power was vested with Registrar alone.

3. Admission of evidence by the Registrar and the High Court in certain proceedings

In any proceeding relating to a geographical indication, the Registrar or the High Court, as the case may be shall admit evidence of the usages of the geographical indication and of any relevant geographical indication legitimately used by other persons. (section 75).

Yüksek Mahkemeye Verilen Yetkiler

• Karardan itirazları duymak, Yazı İşleri Müdürünün emri.
• Yüksek Mahkemenin her emri veya kararı hakkında kayıt memuruna iletmek.
• Sanık tarafından tescilin geçersizliği ileri sürüldüğünde davanın durdurulması.
• İhlal eden taraf, bir ihlal davasında tescilin geçersizliği iddiasında bulunduğunda, yalnızca Yüksek Mahkeme önünde düzeltme başvurusunda bulunmasına izin verilebilir.
• To issue Certificate of validity of registration to the registered proprietor or the authorized user of the geographical indication.

1. Temyizler Yüksek Mahkemeye yapılır.

Karara, bu Kanuna göre Yazı İşleri Müdürünün emrine veya bu Kanuna göre yapılan hükümlere karşı itiraz, temyiz olunan emir veya kararın itirazı tercih edene tebliğinden itibaren üç ay içinde Yüksek Mahkemeye tercih edilebilir. (bölüm 31)

2. Power in Rectification of the register

A certified copy of every order or judgement of the High Court relating to a registered Geographical Indication shall be communicated to the Registrar by the High Court and the Registrar shall give effect to the order of the High Court and shall, when so directed, amend the entries in, or rectify the register in accordance with such order. (section 34)

3. Power of the High Court in procedures where invalidity of registration is pleaded by the accused

When a person is accused of applying false Geographical Indications, or of selling goods to which false Geographical Indications is applied, or is convicted for subsequent commission of the above said acts, and he pleads in his defence the invalidity of the registration of the Geographical Indications, he may be enabled to file an application before the High Court within 3 months for rectification of register on the ground that the registration is invalid, and the court shall stay the proceedings till the disposal of the rectification application. And if the accused had already filed such application before his conviction of the said offences, and such proceedings is pending before the Registrar or the High Court, as the case may be, the court shall stay the further proceedings pending the disposal of the rectification application. (section 48)

4. Tescilin geçersizliğinin ihlal eden tarafından ileri sürüldüğü işlemlerde Yüksek Mahkemenin yetkisi.

Where in an infringement suit, the defendant pleads that the registration of the plaintiff’s geographical indication is invalid, he may be enabled to file an application only before the High Court for rectification of register on the ground that the registration is invalid. And if such application is filed prior to the suit of infringement, before the Registrar or the High Court, as the case may be, the court shall stay the further proceedings pending the disposal of the rectification application. (section 57 & 58)

5. Yüksek Mahkemenin tescilin geçerlilik belgesi verme yetkisi.

In a proceeding for rectification of the register before the High Court, a decision is in favor of the registered proprietor or the authorized user of the geographical indication on the issue as to the validity of the registration, or of the authorized use of the geographical indication, the High Court may grant a certificate to that effect. This certificate can be used to obtain a favorable order in further proceedings where the validity of the registration is challenged. (section 72)

Yazar: Sayyid Qutub

İlgili Mesaj: Tribunal Reforms Ordinance and changes to the Geographical Indications Act, 1999

Coinsmart. Europa İçindeki En İyi Bitcoin-Börse
Source: https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/vitiation-of-ipab-and-beyond-geographical-indications/