Soeteman-Hernandez, L. G. et al. Safe innovation approach: towards an agile system for dealing with innovations. Anne. Bugün Komün. 20, 100548 (2019).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Nymark, P. et al. Toward rigorous materials production: new approach methodologies have extensive potential to improve current safety assessment practices. Küçük 16, 1904749 (2020).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Karcher, S. et al. Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: challenges and recommendations. NanoEtki 9, 85 – 101 (2018).

makale  Google Scholar 

Powers, C. M. et al. Nanocuration workflows: establishing best practices for identifying, inputting, and sharing data to inform decisions on nanomaterials. Beilstein J. Nanoteknoloji. 6, 1860 – 1871 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Mahony, C., Currie, R., Daston, G., Kleinstreuer, N. & van de Water, B. Highlight report: ‘Big data in the 3R’s: outlook and recommendations’, a roundtable summary. Arch. Toksikol. 92, 1015 – 1020 (2018).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Haase, A. & Klaessig, F. EU–US Roadmap Nanoinformatics 2030 (EU Nanosafety Cluster, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1486012

Marchese Robinson, R. L. et al. How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated? Nano ölçekli 8, 9919 – 9943 (2016).

makale  CAS  Google Scholar 

Giusti, A. et al. Nanomaterial grouping: existing approaches and future recommendations. NanoEtki 16, 100182 (2019).

makale  Google Scholar 

Haase, A. & Lynch, I. Quality in nanosafety—towards reliable nanomaterial safety assessment. NanoEtki 11, 67 – 68 (2018).

makale  Google Scholar 

Comandella, D., Gottardo, S., Rio-Echevarria, I. M. & Rauscher, H. Quality of physicochemical data on nanomaterials: an assessment of data completeness and variability. Nano ölçekli 12, 4695 – 4708 (2020).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Tropsha, A., Mills, K. C. & Hickey, A. J. Reproducibility, sharing and progress in nanomaterial databases. Nat. Nanoteknoloji. 12, 1111 – 1114 (2017).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Veri 3, 160018 (2016).

makale  Google Scholar 

Hendren, C. O., Powers, C. M., Hoover, M. D. & Harper, S. L. The Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative: a collaborative approach to assessing, evaluating, and advancing the state of the field. Beilstein J. Nanoteknoloji. 6, 1752 – 1762 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) Strategic Implementation Plan (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2019); https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/78ae5276-ae8e-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Avrupa İçin Yeni Bir Sanayi Stratejisi (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2020); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-eu-industrial-strategy-march-2020_en.pdf

A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2020); https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf

Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2021); https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/chemicals/2020/10/Strategy.pdf

Jeliazkova, N. et al. The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information. Beilstein J. Nanoteknoloji. 6, 1609 – 1634 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Jeliazkova, N. et al. Linking LRI AMBIT chemoinformatic system with the IUCLID substance database to support read-across of substance endpoint data and category formation. Toksikol. Lett. 258, S114 – S115 (2016).

makale  Google Scholar 

Kochev, N., Jeliazkova, N. & Tsakovska, I. in Big Data in Predictive Toxicology (eds Neagu, D. & Richarz, A.-N.) 69–107 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020).

Hastings, J. et al. eNanoMapper: harnessing ontologies to enable data integration for nanomaterial risk assessment. J. Biomed. Semant. 6, 10 – 10 (2015).

makale  Google Scholar 

Totaro, S. et al. The JRC Nanomaterials Repository: a unique facility providing representative test materials for nanoEHS research. Regul. Toxicol. Ecz. 81, 334 – 340 (2016).

makale  Google Scholar 

Chomenidis, C. et al. Jaqpot Quattro: a novel computational web platform for modeling and analysis in nanoinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Modeli 57, 2161 – 2172 (2017).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Mech, A. et al. Insights into possibilities for grouping and read-across for nanomaterials in EU chemicals legislation. Nanotoksikoloji 13, 119 – 141 (2019).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Precupas, A. et al. Thermodynamic parameters at bio–nano Interface and nanomaterial toxicity: a case study on BSA interaction with ZnO, SiO₂ve TiO₂. Kimya Araş. Toksikol. 33, 2054 – 2071 (2020).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Berrios, D. C., Beheshti, A. & Costes, S. V. FAIRness and usability for open-access omics data systems. AMIA Annu Symp. Proc. 2018, 232 – 241 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Jeliazkova, N. eNanoMapper—parsers for different NM data formats GitHub https://github.com/enanomapper/nmdataparser

Kochev, N. et al. Your spreadsheets can be FAIR: a tool and FAIRification workflow for the eNanoMapper Database. Nanomalzemeler 10, 1908 (2020).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Gottardo, S. et al. NANoREG Framework for the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials (Joint Research Centre, 2017); https://doi.org/10.2760/245972

Kermanizadeh, A. et al. A multilaboratory toxicological assessment of a panel of 10 engineered nanomaterials to human health—ENPRA Project—the highlights, limitations, and current and future challenges. J. Toxicol. Environ. Sağlık B 19, 1 – 28 (2016).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Bos, P. M. J. et al. The MARINA risk assessment strategy: a flexible strategy for efficient information collection and risk assessment of nanomaterials. Int. J. Environmental. Res. Halk Sağlığı 12, 15007 – 15021 (2015).

makale  Google Scholar 

Nesslany, F. NANOGENOTOX European joint action: what could we learn from all these data?. Toksikol. Lett. 229, Ö35 (2014).

makale  Google Scholar 

Juillerat-Jeanneret, L. et al. Biological impact assessment of nanomaterial used in nanomedicine. Introduction to the NanoTEST project. Nanotoksikoloji 9, 5 – 12 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Dusinska, M. et al. Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: lessons from NanoTEST. Nanotoksikoloji 9, 118 – 132 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Nano Exposure & Contextual Information Database (NECID) (PEROSCH, accessed 1 March 2020); https://perosh.eu/research-projects/perosh-projects/necid/

Pelzer, J. Structure and functionality of the Nano Exposure and Contextual Information Database (NECID). Gefahrst. Reinhalt. Luft. 73, 302 – 304 (2013).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nükleik Asitler Arş. 41, D991 – D995 (2013).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Kolesnikov, N. et al. ArrayExpress update—simplifying data submissions. Nükleik Asitler Arş. 43, D1113 – D1116 (2015).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

NANOSOLUTIONS Data Repository (NANOSOLUTIONS, accessed 1 March 2020); http://nanosolutionsfp7.com/

Fernández-Cruz, M. L. et al. Quality evaluation of human and environmental toxicity studies performed with nanomaterials—the GUIDEnano approach. Environ. bilim nano 5, 381 – 397 (2018).

makale  Google Scholar 

Gottardo, S., Quiros Pesudo, L., Totaro, S., Riego Sintes, J. & Crutzen, H. NANoREG Harmonised Terminology for Environmental Health and Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2017); https://doi.org/10.2788/71213

Krebs, A. et al. Template for the description of cell-based toxicological test methods to allow evaluation and regulatory use of the data. ATLA 36, 682 – 699 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Totaro, S., Crutzen, H. & Riego Sintes, J. Data Logging Templates for the Environmental, Health and Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials (Joint Research Centre, 2017); https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC103178

NANoREG Results Repository (RIVM, 2017); https://www.rivm.nl/en/about-rivm/mission-and-strategy/international-affairs/international-projects/nanoreg

Wilkinson, M. D. et al. Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, community-governed framework. Sci. Veri 6, 174 (2019).

makale  Google Scholar 

Criteria for FAIR Research Data (Swedish Research Council, 2019); https://staff.ki.se/the-fair-principles

Collins, S. et al. Turning FAIR into Reality. Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2018); https://doi.org/10.2777/1524

Willighagen E., Jeliazkova N. NanoCommons—nanomaterial identifiers, basis for European Registry of Nanomaterials (ERM) GitHub https://github.com/NanoCommons/identifiers/blob/master/registry

Nymark, P. et al. caLIBRAte D5.3—Document on Quality Criteria for Data (EU Nanosafety Cluster, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3859951

Ammar, A. et al. A semi-automated workflow for FAIR maturity indicators in the life sciences. Nanomalzemeler 10, 2068 (2020).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Nymark, P. et al. Grouping of representative nanomaterials is efficiently executed by combining high-throughput-generated biological data with physicochemical data. Toksikol. Lett. 314, abstr. OP02-02 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Marvel, S. W. et al. ToxPi Graphical User Interface 2.0: dynamic exploration, visualization, and sharing of integrated data models. BMC Bioinf. 19, 80 (2018).

makale  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lamon, L. et al. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques. Bölüm. Fiber Toxicol. 15, 37 (2018).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Antikainen, M., Uusitalo, T. & Kivikytö-Reponen, P. Digitalisation as an enabler of circular economy. Procedia CIRP 73, 45 – 49 (2018).

makale  Google Scholar 

Falzetti, M., Keiper, W., Igartua, A. & Alliance for Materials (A4M) Consortium. Opinion Paper on Governance and Strategic Programming of Materials Research and Innovation in Horizon Europe (EUMAT, 2019); https://www.eumat.eu/media/uploads/descargas/2019_02_a4m_position_paper_v44.pdf

Carusi, A. et al. Harvesting the promise of AOPs: an assessment and recommendations. Sci. Toplam Çevre 628-629, 1542 – 1556 (2018).

makale  CAS  Google Scholar 

Martens, M. et al. WikiPathways: connecting communities. Nükleik Asitler Arş. 49, D613 – D621 (2021).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Davis, A. P. et al. Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021. Nükleik Asitler Arş. 49, D1138 – D1143 (2021).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Sansone, S.-A. et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat. Genet. 44, 121 – 126 (2012).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Jeliazkova, N., Haase, A., Ritchie, P., Shahzad, R. & Nymark, P. NanoReg2 D1.8—Report on the Defined ISA‐TAB Nano Templates (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2016).

Jeliazkova, N. & Jeliazkov, V. AMBIT RESTful web services: an implementation of the OpenTox application programming interface. J. Cheminformatics 3, 18 (2011).

CAS  makale  Google Scholar 

Shandilya, N. et al. NanoReg2 D3.2—Database/Structural Model and Report Describing the Relationships between Functionality, Physicochemical Properties and Hazard, and Allowing for Integration in the Safe Innovation Approach (2018); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3854938

NANoREG D6.05 Database sql (RIVM, accessed 23 November 2019); https://www.rivm.nl/en/documenten/nanoreg-d605-database-sql

Tanasescu, S. et al. in Nanomaterials—Functional Properties and Applications (eds Zaharescu, M. et al.) 85–97 (Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, 2020).

Jeliazkova, N. et al. eNanoMapper D3.4—ISA-Tab Templates for Common Bioselected Set of Assays (Avrupa Komisyonu, 2014); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.375814