Elimelech, M. & Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333, 712–717 (2011).
Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O. & Elimelech, M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–15 (2016).
Werber, J. R., Deshmukh, A. & Elimelech, M. The critical need for increased selectivity, not increased water permeability, for desalination membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 3, 112–120 (2016).
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M. & Freeman, B. D. Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356, 1138–1148 (2017).
Werber, J. R. & Elimelech, M. Permselectivity limits of biomimetic desalination membranes. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8266 (2018).
Werber, J. R., Porter, C. J. & Elimelech, M. A path to ultraselectivity: Support layer properties to maximize performance of biomimetic desalination membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 10737–10747 (2018).
Ritt, C. L., Werber, J. R., Deshmukh, A. & Elimelech, M. Monte carlo simulations of framework defects in layered two-dimensional nanomaterial desalination membranes: implications for permeability and selectivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6214–6224 (2019).
Homaeigohar, S. & Elbahri, M. Graphene membranes for water desalination. NPG Asia Mater. 9, e427 (2017).
Luo, T., Abdu, S. & Wessling, M. Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: A review. J. Memb. Sci. 555, 429–454 (2018).
Zhang, H. et al. Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with subnanometer pores. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0066 (2018).
Li, X. et al. Fast and selective fluoride ion conduction in sub-1-nanometer metal-organic framework channels. Nat. Commun. 10, 2490 (2019).
Alvarez, P. J. J., Chan, C. K., Elimelech, M., Halas, N. J. & Villagrán, D. Emerging opportunities for nanotechnology to enhance water security. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 634–641 (2018).
Sadeghi, I., Kaner, P. & Asatekin, A. Controlling and expanding the selectivity of filtration membranes. Chem. Mater. 21, 7328–7354 (2018).
Nghiem, L. D. et al. Extraction and transport of metal ions and small organic compounds using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs). J. Memb. Sci. 281, 7–41 (2006).
Thiruraman, J. P. et al. Angstrom-size defect creation and ionic transport through pores in single-layer MoS2. Nano Lett. 18, 1651–1659 (2018).
Radha, B. et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538, 222–225 (2016).
Jones, E., Qadir, M., van Vliet, M. T. H., Smakhtin, V. & Kang, S. The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1343–1356 (2019).
Campione, A. et al. Electrodialysis for water desalination: A critical assessment of recent developments on process fundamentals, models and applications. Desalination 434, 121–160 (2018).
Faucher, S. et al. Critical knowledge gaps in mass transport through single-digit nanopores: A review and perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 21309–21326 (2019).
Wijmans, J. G. & Baker, R. W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Memb. Sci. 107, 1–21 (1995).
Mukherjee, P. & Sengupta, A. K. Ion exchange selectivity as a surrogate indicator of relative permeability of ions in reverse osmosis processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1432–1440 (2003).
Epsztein, R., Cheng, W., Shaulsky, E., Dizge, N. & Elimelech, M. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying the difference between chloride and nitrate rejection in nanofiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 548, 694–701 (2017).
Sata, T. Studies on anion exchange membranes having permselectivity for specific anions in electrodialysis – Effect of hydrophilicity of anion exchange membranes on permselectivity of anions. J. Memb. Sci. 167, 1–31 (2000).
Cheng, W. et al. Selective removal of divalent cations by polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membrane: Role of polyelectrolyte charge, ion size, and ionic strength. J. Memb. Sci. 559, 98–106 (2018).
Collins, F. C. Activation energy of the Eyring theory of liquid viscosity and diffusion. J. Chem. Phys. 26, 398–400 (1957).
Eyring, H. Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as examples of absolute reaction rates. J. Chem. Phys. 4, 283–291 (1936).
Ewell, R. H. & Eyring, H. Theory of the viscosity of liquids as a function of temperature and pressure. J. Chem. Phys. 5, 726–736 (1937).
Zwolinski, B. J., Eyring, H. & Reese, C. E. Diffusion and membrane permeability. J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 53, 1426–1453 (1949).
Castillo, L. F. Del, Mason, E. A. & Viehland, L. A. Energy-barrier models for membrane transport. Biophys. Chem. 9, 111–120 (1979).
Sogami, M. et al. Application of the transition state theory to water transport across cell membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Biomembr. 1511, 42–48 (2001).
Babu, J. S. & Sathian, S. P. Combining molecular dynamics simulation and transition state theory to evaluate solid-liquid interfacial friction in carbon nanotube membranes. Phys. Rev. E 85, 051205 (2012).
Epsztein, R., Qin, M., Shaulsky, E. & Elimelech, M. Activation behavior for ion permeation in ion-exchange membranes: Role of ion dehydration in selective transport. J. Memb. Sci. 580, 316–326 (2019).
Latorre, R. & Miller, C. Conduction and selectivity in potassium channels. J. Membr. Biol. 71, 11–30 (1983).
Wang, J. H., Robinson, C. V. & Edelman, I. S. Self-diffusion and structure of liquid water. III. Measurement of the self-diffusion of liquid water with H2, H3 and O18 as tracers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 466–470 (1953).
Venkataraman, L., Klare, J. E., Nuckolls, C., Hybertsen, M. S. & Steigerwald, M. L. Dependence of single-molecule junction conductance on molecular conformation. Nature 442, 904–907 (2006).
Pati, R. & Karna, S. P. Current switching by conformational change in a π-σ-π molecular wire. Phys. Rev. B – Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 69, 155419 (2004).
Weigelt, S. et al. Chiral switching by spontaneous conformational change in adsorbed organic molecules. Nat. Mater. 5, 112–117 (2006).
Daasbjerg, K. et al. Evidence for large inner reorganization energies in the reduction of diaryl disulfides: Toward a mechanistic link between concerted and stepwise dissociative electron transfers? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1750–1751 (1999).
Pophristic, V., Goodman, L. & Guchhait, N. Role of lone-pairs in internal rotation barriers. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 4290–4297 (1997).
Sharma, R. R., Agrawal, R. & Chellam, S. Temperature effects on sieving characteristics of thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes: Pore size distributions and transport parameters. J. Memb. Sci. 223, 69–87 (2003).
Luo, J. & Wan, Y. Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration-a critical review. J. Membr. Sci. 438, 18–28 (2013).
Nghiem, L. D., Schäfer, A. I. & Elimelech, M. Role of electrostatic interactions in the retention of pharmaceutically active contaminants by a loose nanofiltration membrane. J. Memb. Sci. 286, 52–59 (2006).
Epsztein, R., Shaulsky, E., Dizge, N., Warsinger, D. M. & Elimelech, M. Role of ionic charge density in Donnan exclusion of monovalent anions by nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 4108–4116 (2018).
Richards, L. A., Schäfer, A. I., Richards, B. S. & Corry, B. The importance of dehydration in determining ion transport in narrow pores. Small 8, 1701–1709 (2012).
Marcus, Y. Thermodynamics of solvation of ions. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87, 2995–2999 (1991).
Ben-Amotz, D., Raineri, F. O. & Stell, G. Solvation thermodynamics: Theory and applications. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6866–6878 (2005).
Sahu, S., Di Ventra, M. & Zwolak, M. Dehydration as a universal mechanism for ion selectivity in graphene and other atomically thin pores. Nano Lett. 17, 4719–4724 (2017).
Richards, L. A., Schäfer, A. I., Richards, B. S. & Corry, B. Quantifying barriers to monovalent anion transport in narrow non-polar pores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 11633–11638 (2012).
Zwolak, M., Wilson, J. & Di Ventra, M. Dehydration and ionic conductance quantization in nanopores. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 454126 (2010).
Tansel, B. Significance of thermodynamic and physical characteristics on permeation of ions during membrane separation: Hydrated radius, hydration free energy and viscous effects. Sep. Purif. Technol. 86, 119–126 (2012).
Sata, T., Yamaguchi, T. & Matsusaki, K. Effect of hydrophobicity of ion exchange groups of anion exchange membranes on permselectivity between two anions. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 12875–12882 (1995).
Hannesschlaeger, C., Horner, A. & Pohl, P. Intrinsic membrane permeability to small molecules. Chem. Rev. 119, 5922–5953 (2019).
De Gier, J., Mandersloot, J. G., Hupkes, J. V., McElhaney, R. N. & van Veek, W. P. On the mechanism of non-electrolyte permeation through lipid bilayers and through biomembranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 233, 610–618 (1971).
Noy, A. Kinetic model of gas transport in carbon nanotube channels. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 7656–7660 (2013).
Boo, C. et al. High performance nanofiltration membrane for effective removal of perfluoroalkyl substances at high water recovery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 7279–7288 (2018).
DuChanois, R. M., Epsztein, R., Trivedi, J. A. & Elimelech, M. Controlling pore structure of polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membranes by tuning polyelectrolyte-salt interactions. J. Memb. Sci. 581, 413–420 (2019).
Farrokhzad, H., Darvishmanesh, S., Genduso, G., Van Gerven, T. & Van Der Bruggen, B. Development of bivalent cation selective ion exchange membranes by varying molecular weight of polyaniline. Electrochim. Acta 158, 64–72 (2015).
Vaselbehagh, M., Karkhanechi, H., Takagi, R. & Matsuyama, H. Surface modification of an anion exchange membrane to improve the selectivity for monovalent anions in electrodialysis – experimental verification of theoretical predictions. J. Memb. Sci. 490, 301–310 (2015).
Epsztein, R., Nir, O., Lahav, O. & Green, M. Selective nitrate removal from groundwater using a hybrid nanofiltration–reverse osmosis filtration scheme. Chem. Eng. J. 279, 372–378 (2015).
Zhou, Y. & MacKinnon, R. The occupancy of ions in the K+ selectivity filter: Charge balance and coupling of ion binding to a protein conformational change underlie high conduction rates. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 965–975 (2003).
Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998).
Morais-Cabral, Ä. H., Kaufman, A. & Mackinnon, R. Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a K+ channel-Fab complex at 2.0 Å resolution. Nature 414, 43–48 (2001).
Gouaux, E. & MacKinnon, R. Principles of selective ion transport in channels and pumps. Science 310, 1461–1465 (2005).
Barboiu, M. Encapsulation versus self-aggregation toward highly selective artificial K+ channels. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2711–2718 (2018).
Gilles, A. & Barboiu, M. Highly selective artificial K+ channels: An example of selectivity-induced transmembrane potential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 426–432 (2016).
Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J. & Eyring, H. The Theory of Rate Processes (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1941).
Eyring, H. The activated complex and the absolute rate of chemical reactions. Chem. Rev. 17, 65–77 (1935).
Kopec, W. et al. Direct knock-on of desolvated ions governs strict ion selectivity in K+ channels. Nat. Chem. 10, 813–820 (2018).
Schoch, R. B., Han, J. & Renaud, P. Transport phenomena in nanofluidics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839–883 (2008).
Abraham, J. et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 546–550 (2017).
Li, W., Wu, W. & Li, Z. Controlling interlayer spacing of graphene oxide membranes by external pressure regulation. ACS Nano 12, 9309–9317 (2018).
Simon, G. P. et al. Ion transport in complex layered graphene-based membranes with tuneable interlayer spacing. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501272 (2016).
Chen, L. et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550, 1–4 (2017).
Joshi, R. K. et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752–754 (2014).
Choi, W. et al. Diameter-dependent ion transport through the interior of isolated single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2397 (2013).
Tunuguntla, R. H. et al. Enhanced water permeability and tunable ion selectivity in subnanometer carbon nanotube porins. Science 357, 792–796 (2017).
Ali, S., Rehman, S. A. U., Luan, H. Y., Farid, M. U. & Huang, H. Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for membrane-based water treatment and desalination. Sci. Total Environ. 646, 1126–1139 (2019).
Li, F., Li, L., Liao, X. & Wang, Y. Precise pore size tuning and surface modifications of polymeric membranes using the atomic layer deposition technique. J. Memb. Sci. 385–386, 1–9 (2011).
Chen, P. et al. Atomic layer deposition to fine-tune the surface properties and diameters of fabricated nanopores. Nano Lett. 4, 1333–1337 (2004).
Spichiger-keller, U. E. Ionophores, ligands and reactands. Anal. Chim. Acta 400, 65–72 (1999).
Ovchinnikov, Y. A. Physico‐chemical basis of ion transport through biological membranes: ionophores and ion channels. Eur. J. Biochem. 94, 321–336 (1979).
Ammann, D. et al. Preparation of neutral ionophores for alkali and alkaline earth metal cations and their application in ion selective membrane electrodes. Helv. Chem. Acta 58, 1535–1548 (1975).
Bowman-James, K. Alfred Werner revisited: The coordination chemistry of anions. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 671–678 (2005).
Kang, S. O., Begum, R. A. & Bowman-James, K. Amide-based ligands for anion coordination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7882–7894 (2006).
Prets, E., Badertscher, M., Welti, M., Morf, W. E. & Simon, W. Design features of ionophores for ion selective electrodes. Pure Appl. Chem. 60, 567–574 (1988).
Almeida, M. I. G. S., Cattrall, R. W. & Kolev, S. D. Recent trends in extraction and transport of metal ions using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs). J. Memb. Sci. 415–416, 9–23 (2012).
Sheng, C., Wijeratne, S., Cheng, C., Baker, G. L. & Bruening, M. L. Facilitated ion transport through polyelectrolyte multilayer films containing metal-binding ligands. J. Memb. Sci. 459, 169–176 (2014).
Toutianoush, A., El-Hashani, A., Schnepf, J. & Tieke, B. Multilayer membranes of p-sulfonato-calix[8]arene and polyvinylamine and their use for selective enrichment of rare earth metal ions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 246, 430–436 (2005).
Acar, E. T., Buchsbaum, S. F., Combs, C., Fornasiero, F. & Siwy, Z. S. Biomimetic potassium-selective nanopores. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2568 (2019).
Fang, A., Kroenlein, K., Riccardi, D. & Smolyanitsky, A. Highly mechanosensitive ion channels from graphene-embedded crown ethers. Nat. Mater. 18, 76–81 (2019).
Richards, L. A., Richards, B. S., Corry, B. & Schäfer, A. I. Experimental energy barriers to anions transporting through nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1968–1976 (2013).
Sigurdardottir, S. B., DuChanois, R. M., Epsztein, R., Pinelo, M. & Elimelech, M. Energy barriers to anion transport in nanofiltration membranes: role of intra-pore diffusion. J. Memb. Sci. 603, 117921 (2020).
Khavrutskii, I. V., Gorfe, A. A., Lu, B. & McCammon, J. A. Free energy for the permeation of Na+ and CI- ions and their Ion-pair through a zwitterionic dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer by umbrella integration with harmonic fourier beads. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1706–1716 (2009).
Gao, P., Hunter, A., Summe, M. J. & Phillip, W. A. A method for the efficient fabrication of multifunctional mosaic membranes by inkjet printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 19772–19779 (2016).
Rajesh, S., Yan, Y., Chang, H. C., Gao, H. & Phillip, W. A. Mixed mosaic membranes prepared by layer-by-layer assembly for ionic separations. ACS Nano 8, 12338–12345 (2014).
Malmir, H. et al. Induced charge anisotropy: A hidden variable affecting ion transport through membranes. Matter 2, 735–750 (2019).
Haji-Akbari, A. Forward-flux sampling with jumpy order parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 072303 (2018).
Tu, K. L., Nghiem, L. D. & Chivas, A. R. Coupling effects of feed solution pH and ionic strength on the rejection of boron by NF/RO membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 168, 700–706 (2011).
Somrani, A., Hamzaoui, A. H. & Pontie, M. Study on lithium separation from salt lake brines by nanofiltration (NF) and low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO). Desalination 317, 184–192 (2013).
Saraf, A., Johnson, K. & Lind, M. L. Poly(vinyl) alcohol coating of the support layer of reverse osmosis membranes to enhance performance in forward osmosis. Desalination 333, 1–9 (2014).
Nicolini, J. V., Borges, C. P. & Ferraz, H. C. Selective rejection of ions and correlation with surface properties of nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 171, 238–247 (2016).
Qi, S. et al. Polymersomes-based high-performance reverse osmosis membrane for desalination. J. Memb. Sci. 555, 177–184 (2018).
Richards, L. A., Vuachère, M. & Schäfer, A. I. Impact of pH on the removal of fluoride, nitrate and boron by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Desalination 261, 331–337 (2010).
Jeong, B. H. et al. Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 294, 1–7 (2007).
Hong, S. U., Malaisamy, R. & Bruening, M. L. Optimization of flux and selectivity in Cl-/SO42- separations with multilayer polyelectrolyte membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 283, 366–372 (2006).
Mukherjee, D., Kulkarni, A. & Gill, W. N. Flux enhancement of reverse osmosis membranes by chemical surface modification. J. Memb. Sci. 97, 231–249 (1994).
Harrison, C. J., Le Gouellec, Y. A., Cheng, R. C. & Childress, A. E. Bench-scale testing of nanofiltration for seawater desalination. J. Environ. Eng. 133, 1004–1014 (2007).
Giagnorio, M. et al. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 25294–25305 (2018).
Redondo, J. A. & Frank, K. F. Sea water applications with FILMTEC reverse osmosis membranes from small to large plants in 10 years. Desalination 82, 31–49 (1991).
Arena, J. T., McCloskey, B., Freeman, B. D. & McCutcheon, J. R. Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: Enabling use of reverse osmosis membranes in pressure retarded osmosis. J. Memb. Sci. 375, 55–62 (2011).
Al-Zoubi, H., Hilal, N., Darwish, N. A. & Mohammad, A. W. Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler-Kedem model. Desalination 206, 42–60 (2007).
Widjaya, A., Hoang, T., Stevens, G. W. & Kentish, S. E. A comparison of commercial reverse osmosis membrane characteristics and performance under alginate fouling conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 89, 270–281 (2012).
Malaisamy, R., Talla-Nwafo, A. & Jones, K. L. Polyelectrolyte modification of nanofiltration membrane for selective removal of monovalent anions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 77, 367–374 (2011).
Wang, K. Y., Chung, T. S. & Qin, J. J. Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process. J. Memb. Sci. 300, 6–12 (2007).
Freger, V., Arnot, T. C. & Howell, J. A. Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 178, 185–193 (2000).
Nilsson, M., Trägårdh, G. & Östergren, K. The influence of sodium chloride on mass transfer in a polyamide nanofiltration membrane at elevated temperatures. J. Memb. Sci. 280, 928–936 (2006).
Tsuru, T., Izumi, S., Yoshioka, T. & Asaeda, M. Temperature effect on transport performance by inorganic nanofiltration membranes. AIChE J. 46, 565–574 (2000).
Tsuru, T., Ogawa, K., Kanezashi, M. & Yoshioka, T. Permeation characteristics of electrolytes and neutral solutes through titania nanofiltration membranes at high temperatures. Langmuir 26, 10897–10905 (2010).
Sharma, R. R. & Chellam, S. Temperature and concentration effects on electrolyte transport across porous thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes: Pore transport mechanisms and energetics of permeation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 327–340 (2006).
Snow, M. J. H., de Winter, D., Buckingham, R., Campbell, J. & Wagner, J. New techniques for extreme conditions: high temperature reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Desalination 105, 57–61 (1996).
Saltonstall, C. W. Jr Practical aspects of sea water desalination by reverse osmosis. Desalination 18, 315–320 (1976).
Li, L., Dong, J. & Nenoff, T. M. Transport of water and alkali metal ions through MFI zeolite membranes during reverse osmosis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 53, 42–48 (2007).
Mehdizadeh, H., Dickson, J. M. & Eriksson, P. K. Temperature effects on the performance of thin-film composite, aromatic polyamide membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 28, 814–824 (1989).
Connell, P. J. & Dickson, J. M. Modeling reverse osmosis separations with strong solute‐membrane affinity at different temperatures using the finely porous model. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 35, 1129–1148 (1988).
Chen, J.-Y., Nomura, H. & Pusch, W. Temperature dependence of membrane transport parameters in hyperfiltration. Desalination 46, 437–446 (1983).
Lonsdale, H. K., Merten, U. & Riley, R. L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 9, 1341–1362 (1965).
Reid, C. E. & Kuppers, J. R. Physical characteristics of osmotic membranes of organic polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2, 264–272 (1959).
Gary-Bobo, C. M. Effect of geometrical and chemical constraints on water flux across artificial membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 57, 610–622 (2004).
Gary-Bobo, C. M. Role of hydrogen-bonding in nonelectrolyte diffusion through dense artificial membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 54, 369–382 (2004).
Badessa, T. & Shaposhnik, V. The electrodialysis of electrolyte solutions of multi-charged cations. J. Memb. Sci. 498, 86–93 (2016).
Freger, V. et al. Diffusion of water and ethanol in ion-exchange membranes: Limits of the geometric approach. J. Memb. Sci. 160, 213–224 (1999).
Kumar, M., Grzelakowski, M., Zilles, J., Clark, M. & Meier, W. Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the incorporation of the functional water channel protein Aquaporin Z. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20719–20724 (2007).
Borgnia, M. J., Kozono, D., Calamita, G., Maloney, P. C. & Agre, P. Functional reconstitution and characterization of AqpZ, the E. coli water channel protein. J. Mol. Biol. 291, 1169–1179 (1999).
Corry, B. Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 1427–1434 (2008).
Song, C. & Corry, B. Intrinsic ion selectivity of narrow hydrophobic pores. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 7642–7649 (2009).
Williams, C. D. & Carbone, P. Selective removal of technetium from water using graphene oxide membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3875–3881 (2016).
Sahu, S. & Zwolak, M. Ionic selectivity and filtration from fragmented dehydration in multilayer graphene nanopores. Nanoscale 9, 11424–11428 (2017).
Konatham, D., Yu, J., Ho, T. A. & Striolo, A. Simulation insights for graphene-based water desalination membranes. Langmuir 29, 11884–11897 (2013).
Zwolak, M., Lagerqvist, J. & Di Ventra, M. Quantized ionic conductance in nanopores. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 128102 (2009).
Arrhenius, S. A. Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren. Z. Phys. Chem. 4, 226–248 (1889).
Eyring, H. The theory of absolute reaction rates. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 41–48 (1938).
Kramers, H. A. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7, 284–304 (1940).
Hanggi, P. 50 years after Kramers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251–341 (1990).
Wynne-Jones, W. F. K. & Eyring, H. The absolute rate of reactions in condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 492–502 (1935).
Garrett, B. C. Variational transition state theory. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35, 159–189 (1984).
