Gabatarwa

Shari'ar Niranjan Arvind Gosavi And Ors vs Innovatiview India Private Limited (CS (COMM) 214/2024) an saurare shi a Babban Kotun Delhi. Al'amarin ya shafi takaddama game da haƙƙin mallaka, musamman Patent No. 336205. Wannan lamban kira, da aka bayar tare da fifikon ranar 9 ga Yuli, 2019, yana da alaƙa da hanyar samar da amintaccen lambar sirri don takarda da tabbatar da lambar sirri da mai riƙe ta. Yana da nufin gano takaddun karya da kwafi a cikin yanayin layi. Rikicin ya taso ne a cikin mahallin e-tender da Hukumar Gwaji ta Ƙasa (NTA) ta bayar don Magani na Lambobin QR tare da rubutattun rubutu. Masu gabatar da kara sun yi imanin cewa ƙayyadaddun ƙayyadaddun e-tender na buƙatar amfani da fasahar haƙƙinsu.

An Gabatar da Tsaro

Masu gabatar da kara sun ba da sanarwar dakatar da dakatarwa ga wanda ake kara a ranar 10 ga Fabrairu, 2024, bisa zargin cin zarafin su. Wanda ake tuhuma, Innovatiview India Private Limited, ya bi diddigin wata sanarwa na tsaro da ya ce sun aiwatar da nasu fasahar, duk da cewa ba su nemi takardar shaidar ba. Sun bayar da hujjar cewa ko da haƙƙin masu shigar da kara yana da inganci, za a kare su daga ƙetaren da'awar da ke ƙarƙashinsa. sashe 47 karanta tare da 156 na Dokar Haɓaka, 1970. Sashe na 47 na dokar haƙƙin mallaka, wanda ke baiwa gwamnati damar yin amfani da fasahar haƙƙin mallaka don amfanin kanta. Sun yi zargin cewa gwamnati za ta iya ba su kwangila, wanda zai ba da kariya daga da'awar cin zarafi.

Masu shigar da kara sun karyata hujjar wanda ake kara, inda suka bayyana cewa sashe na 47 ba ya bayar da kariya ga masu iya keta doka. Sun bayar da hujjar cewa yayin da gwamnati za ta iya amfani da patent don manufarta, har yanzu ana iya hukunta mai laifin.

Binciken Kotun

Da fari, Kotun ta ba da keɓancewa daga shiga tsakani kafin cibiyoyi bisa ga Chandra Kishore Chaurasia v. RA Perfumery Works Private Ltd abin da ya gabata.

Na biyu, Kotun ta yanke shawarar kada ta ba da umarni a matakin wucin gadi, "la’akari da irin tasirin da zai iya yi kan tsarin bayar da kwangilar NTA “La’akari da cewa duk wani umurni da wannan kotu ta zartar a matakin farko na wucin gadi zai yi tasiri ga kammalawa da aiwatar da tsarin ta NTA kuma yana iya yin tasiri ga buƙatu da wajibcin NTA, wanda hukumar jarrabawar Indiya ce, wannan Kotun ba ta ganin ya dace da bayar da umarni a wannan matakin na wucin gadi.“. Sai dai kotun ta baiwa masu kara damar sanar da NTA game da takaddamar haƙƙin mallaka da kuma tasirinta kan tsarin bayar da kwangilar.

A ƙarshe, Kotun ta umurci wanda ake kara da ya rike asusu na kudaden shiga da aka samu idan sun yi nasara a cikin tsarin kwangilar. Har ila yau, yana buƙatar bayanan fasaha da za a shigar da su a cikin murfin da aka rufe.

• Ƙunshin Ƙarfafa SEO & Rarraba PR. Samun Girma a Yau.
• PlatoData.Network Tsaye Generative Ai. Karfafa Kanka. Shiga Nan.
• PlatoAiStream. Web3 Mai hankali. Ilmi Ya Faru. Shiga Nan.
• PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Kuzari, Muhalli, Solar, Gudanar da Sharar gida. Shiga Nan.
• PlatoHealth. Biotech da Clinical Trials Intelligence. Shiga Nan.
• Source: https://www.theippress.com/2024/03/20/relief-barred-for-barcode-patent-by-the-delhi-high-court/