Connect with us


Current-Temperature Scaling for a Schottky Interface with Nonparabolic Energy Dispersion




In this paper, we study the Schottky transport in a narrow-gap semiconductor and few-layer graphene in which the energy dispersions are highly nonparabolic. We propose that the contrasting current-temperature scaling relation of


in the conventional Schottky interface and


in graphene-based Schottky interface can be reconciled under Kane’s


nonparabolic band model for narrow-gap semiconductors. Our model suggests a more general form of


, where the nonparabolicty parameter


provides a smooth transition from




scaling. For few-layer graphene, we find that


-layer graphene with


stacking follows


, while


stacking follows a universal form of


regardless of the number of layers. Intriguingly, the Richardson constant extracted from the Arrhenius plot using an incorrect scaling relation disagrees with the actual value by 2 orders of magnitude, suggesting that correct models must be used in order to extract important properties for many Schottky devices.

  • Received 7 June 2016


© 2016 American Physical Society

  1. Research Areas
  1. Physical Systems

Condensed Matter & Materials Physics



Probing nonclassicality with matrices of phase-space distributions




Martin Bohmann1,2, Elizabeth Agudelo1, and Jan Sperling3

1Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information – IQOQI Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2QSTAR, INO-CNR, and LENS, Largo Enrico Fermi 2, I-50125 Firenze, Italy
3Integrated Quantum Optics Group, Applied Physics, Paderborn University, 33098 Paderborn, Germany

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.


We devise a method to certify nonclassical features via correlations of phase-space distributions by unifying the notions of quasiprobabilities and matrices of correlation functions. Our approach complements and extends recent results that were based on Chebyshev’s integral inequality [65]. The method developed here correlates arbitrary phase-space functions at arbitrary points in phase space, including multimode scenarios and higher-order correlations. Furthermore, our approach provides necessary and sufficient nonclassicality criteria, applies to phase-space functions beyond $s$-parametrized ones, and is accessible in experiments. To demonstrate the power of our technique, the quantum characteristics of discrete- and continuous-variable, single- and multimode, as well as pure and mixed states are certified only employing second-order correlations and Husimi functions, which always resemble a classical probability distribution. Moreover, nonlinear generalizations of our approach are studied. Therefore, a versatile and broadly applicable framework is devised to uncover quantum properties in terms of matrices of phase-space distributions.

The intuitively accessible representation of quantum effects via quasiprobabilities, defying the nonnegativity requirement of classical probabilities, is a common technique to identify quantum features. However, the complexity of the reconstruction of such distributions increases with their sensitivity to uncover nonclassical signatures. Conversely, approaches based on correlation functions are experimentally available but less intuitive.

The method devised in our paper overcomes such disadvantageous features by unifying both aforementioned techniques. That is, quasiprobabilities can be correlated to unveil nonclassical properties even if the individual distributions are not sensitive enough to identify quantum properties. For example, it is shown that this necessary and sufficient approach applies to discrete- and continuous-variable, single- and multimode, pure and mixed states of light using phase-space distributions that can never become negative.

Thereby, we demonstrate the usefulness of our novel method to certify quantum characteristics in a practical manner that formthe basis for current and future quantum technologies.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).

[2] T. C. Ralph and P. K. Lam, A bright future for quantum communications, Nat. Photonics 3, 671 (2009).

[3] J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photonics 3, 687 (2009).

[4] M. Krenn, M. Malik, T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum communication with photons, in Optics in Our Time (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 455–482.

[5] S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019).

[6] B. Yadin, F. C. Binder, J. Thompson, V. Narasimhachar, M. Gu, and M. S. Kim, Operational Resource Theory of Continuous-Variable Nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041038 (2018).

[7] H. Kwon, K. C. Tan, T. Volkoff, and H. Jeong, Nonclassicality as a Quantifiable Resource for Quantum Metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040503 (2019).

[8] F. Shahandeh, A. P. Lund, and T. C. Ralph, Quantum Correlations in Nonlocal Boson Sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 120502 (2017).

[9] F. Shahandeh, A. P. Lund, and T. C. Ralph, Quantum correlations and global coherence in distributed quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052303 (2019).

[10] M. S. Kim, W. Son, V. Bužek, and P. L. Knight, Entanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a prerequisite for entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032323 (2002).

[11] W. Vogel and J. Sperling, Unified quantification of nonclassicality and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052302 (2014).

[12] N. Killoran, F. E. S. Steinhoff, and M. B. Plenio, Converting Nonclassicality into Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 080402 (2016).

[13] A. Miranowicz, M. Bartkowiak, X. Wang, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Testing nonclassicality in multimode fields: A unified derivation of classical inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013824 (2010).

[14] J. Sperling and W. Vogel, Quasiprobability distributions for quantum-optical coherence and beyond, Phys. Scr. 95, 034007 (2020).

[15] W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).

[16] C. Zachos, D. Fairlie, and T. Curtright, Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).

[17] D. D. Nolte, The tangled tale of phase space, Phys. Today 63, 33 (2010).

[18] H. Weyl, Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie, Z. Phys. 46, 1 (1927).

[19] E. Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).

[20] H. J. Groenewold, On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics, Physica 12, 405 (1946).

[21] J. Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45, 99 (1949).

[22] J. Sperling and I. A. Walmsley, Quasiprobability representation of quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062327 (2018).

[23] R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).

[24] E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).

[25] K. Husimi, Some formal properties of the density matrix, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22, 264 (1940).

[26] U. M. Titulaer and R. J. Glauber, Correlation functions for coherent fields, Phys. Rev. 140, B676 (1965).

[27] L. Mandel, Non-classical states of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Scr. T 12, 34 (1986).

[28] L. Cohen, Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions, J. Math. Phys. 7, 781 (1966).

[29] K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions, Phys. Rev. 177, 1882 (1969).

[30] G. S. Agarwal and E. Wolf, Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. II. Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2187 (1970).

[31] S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).

[32] C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).

[33] G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440001 (2014).

[34] H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, R. Schnabel, J. Slutsky, and H. Vahlbruch, First Long-Term Application of Squeezed States of Light in a Gravitational-Wave Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 181101 (2013).

[35] M. Tse et al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).

[36] H. J. Carmichael and D. F. Walls, Proposal for the measurement of the resonant Stark effect by photon correlation techniques, J. Phys. B 9, L43 (1976).

[37] H. J. Kimble and L. Mandel, Theory of resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2123 (1976).

[38] H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon Antibunching in Resonance Fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691 (1977).

[39] L. Mandel, Sub-Poissonian photon statistics in resonance fluorescence, Opt. Lett. 4, 205 (1979).

[40] X. T. Zou and L. Mandel, Photon-antibunching and sub-Poissonian photon statistics, Phys. Rev. A 41, 475 (1990).

[41] H. P. Yuen, Two-photon coherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976).

[42] D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature (London) 306, 141 (1983).

[43] R. Loudon and P. Knight, Squeezed Light, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 709 (1987).

[44] G. Agarwal, Nonclassical characteristics of the marginals for the radiation field, Opt. Commun. 95, 109 (1993).

[45] G. S. Agarwal, Nonclassical statistics of fields in pair coherent states, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 1940 (1988).

[46] M. Hillery, Amplitude-squared squeezing of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3796 (1987).

[47] D. N. Klyshko, The nonclassical light, Phys.-Uspekhi 39, 573 (1996).

[48] Á. Rivas and A. Luis, Nonclassicality of states and measurements by breaking classical bounds on statistics, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042105 (2009).

[49] M. Bohmann, L. Qi, W. Vogel, and M. Chekhova, Detection-device-independent verification of nonclassical light, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033178 (2019).

[50] G. S. Agarwal and K. Tara, Nonclassical character of states exhibiting no squeezing or sub-Poissonian statistics, Phys. Rev. A 46 485 (1992).

[51] E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Inseparability Criteria for Continuous Bipartite Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005).

[52] E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Conditions for multipartite continuous-variable entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 74, 030302(R) (2006).

[53] A. Miranowicz, M. Piani, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Inseparability criteria based on matrices of moments, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052303 (2009).

[54] E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Universal Measurement of Quantum Correlations of Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 200403 (2006).

[55] W. Vogel, Nonclassical states: An observable criterion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1849 (2000).

[56] T. Richter and W. Vogel, Nonclassicality of quantum states: A hierarchy of observable conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283601 (2002).

[57] A. I. Lvovsky and J. H. Shapiro, Nonclassical character of statistical mixtures of the single-photon and vacuum optical states, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033830 (2002).

[58] A. Zavatta, V. Parigi, and M. Bellini, Experimental nonclassicality of single-photon-added thermal light states, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052106 (2007).

[59] T. Kiesel, W. Vogel, B. Hage, J. DiGuglielmo, A. Samblowski, and R. Schnabel, Experimental test of nonclassicality criteria for phase-diffused squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022122 (2009).

[60] A. Mari, K. Kieling, B. M. Nielsen, E. S. Polzik, and J. Eisert, Directly estimating nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 010403 (2011).

[61] J. Sperling, W. Vogel, and G. S. Agarwal, Operational definition of quantum correlations of light, Phys. Rev. A 94, 013833 (2016).

[62] S. Ryl, J. Sperling, E. Agudelo, M. Mraz, S. Köhnke, B. Hage, and W. Vogel, Unified nonclassicality criteria, Phys. Rev. A 92, 011801(R) (2015).

[63] S. Wallentowitz, R. L. de Matos Filho, and W. Vogel, Determination of entangled quantum states of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1205 (1997).

[64] E. Agudelo, J. Sperling, L. S. Costanzo, M. Bellini, A. Zavatta, and W. Vogel, Conditional Hybrid Nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 120403 (2017).

[65] M. Bohmann and E. Agudelo, Phase-space inequalities beyond negativities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 133601 (2020).

[66] E. Schrödinger, Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro- zur Makromechanik, Naturwiss. 14, 664 (1926).

[67] M. Hillery, Classical Pure States are Coherent States, Phys. Lett. 111, 409 (1985).

[68] M. Rezai, J. Sperling, and I. Gerhardt, What can single photons do what lasers cannot do?, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 045008 (2019).

[69] J. Sperling, Characterizing maximally singular phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A 94, 013814 (2016).

[70] W. Vogel and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum Optics (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006).

[71] E. Shchukin, T. Richter, and W. Vogel, Nonclassicality criteria in terms of moments, Phys. Rev. A 71, 011802(R) (2005).

[72] E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Nonclassical moments and their measurement, Phys. Rev. A 72, 043808 (2005).

[73] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).

[74] The determinant of a $3times 3$ matrix $X=left(begin{smallmatrix} mu & u & v u & U & chi v & chi & V end{smallmatrix}right)$ takes the general form $det X=[(mu U-u^2)(mu V-v^2)-(muchi-uv)^2]/​mu$, which is particularly interesting for the case $mu=1$ because it relates to cross-correlation functions.

[75] It is worth noting that, in quantum optics, the partial derivative with respect to a complex amplitude $alpha$ is given in terms of partial derivatives of the real and imaginary part, $partial_alpha=(partial_{mathrm{Re}(alpha)}+ipartial_{mathrm{Im}(alpha)})/​2$ and $partial_{alpha^ast}=(partial_{mathrm{Re}(alpha)}-ipartial_{mathrm{Im}(alpha)})/​2$.

[76] A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299 (2009).

[77] S. Wallentowitz and W. Vogel, Unbalanced homodyning for quantum state measurements, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4528 (1996).

[78] K. Banaszek, C. Radzewicz, K. Wódkiewicz, and J. S. Krasiński, Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting, Phys. Rev. A 60, 674 (1999).

[79] P. L. Kelley and W. H. Kleiner, Theory of electromagnetic field measurement and photoelectron counting, Phys. Rev. 136, A316 (1964).

[80] J. Sperling et al., Detector-Agnostic Phase-Space Distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 013605 (2020).

[81] G. S. Agarwal, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, Phase narrowing a coherent state via repeated measures: only the no counts count, Phys. Scr. T 48, 128 (1993).

[82] For simplicity, we assume an equal dark-count rate $delta$ for both detectors. However, one can readily generalized this to different dark-count rates for each detector, as $det (M)<0$ remains a sufficient nonclassicality condition.

[83] M. Bohmann, J. Tiedau, T. Bartley, J. Sperling, C. Silberhorn, and W. Vogel, Incomplete Detection of Nonclassical Phase-Space Distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 063607 (2018).

[84] T. Kiesel and W. Vogel, Nonclassicality filters and quasi-probabilities, Phys. Rev. A 82, 032107 (2010).

[85] T. Kiesel, W. Vogel, B. Hage, and R. Schnabel, Direct sampling of negative quasiprobabilities of a squeezed state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 113604 (2011).

[86] T. Richter, Pattern functions used in tomographic reconstruction of photon statistics revisited, Phys. Lett. A 211, 327 (1996).

[87] U. Leonhard, M. Munroe, T. Kiss, T. Richter, and M. G. Raymer, Sampling of photon statistics and density matrix using homodyne detection, Opt. Commun. 127, 144 (1996).

[88] E. Agudelo, J. Sperling, W. Vogel, S. Köhnke, M. Mraz, and B. Hage, Continuous sampling of the squeezed-state nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033837 (2015).

[89] N. Lütkenhaus and S. M. Barnett, Nonclassical effects in phase space, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3340 (1995).

[90] E. Agudelo, J. Sperling, and W. Vogel, Quasiprobabilities for multipartite quantum correlations of light, Phys. Rev. A 87, 033811 (2013).

[91] A. Ferraro and M. G. A. Paris, Nonclassicality Criteria from Phase-Space Representations and Information-Theoretical Constraints Are Maximally Inequivalent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 260403 (2012).

[92] J. Sperling, M. Bohmann, W. Vogel, G. Harder, B. Brecht, V. Ansari, and C. Silberhorn, Uncovering Quantum Correlations with Time-Multiplexed Click Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 023601 (2015).

[93] V. V. Dodonov, I. A. Malkin, and V. I. Manko, Even and odd coherent states and excitations of a singular oscillator, Physica (Amsterdam) 72, 597 (1974).

[94] W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).

[95] A. K. Jaiswal and G. S. Agarwal, Photoelectric detection with Two-Photon Absorption, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1446 (1969).

[96] The approximate POVM element in Eq. (43) has a decomposition in terms of lossy even photon-number operators with the expansion coefficients $[(2n)!/​n!](chi/​eta^2)^n$, which diverge for $ntoinfty$. Using the bounds $sqrt{2pi}m^{m+1/​2}e^{-m}leq m!leq e m^{m+1/​2}e^{-m}$, one finds the bound $chill eeta^2/​[4n]$ to satisfy $[(2n)!/​n!](chi/​eta^2)^nleq [e/​sqrtpi]([4nchi]/​[eeta^2])^nleq 1$ for correctly applying this approximation for upto $2n$ photons. Also note that for coherent states, one obtains the nonnegative function $langlealpha|hatPi|alpharangle=exp(-eta|alpha|^2+chi|alpha|^4)geq0$, representing the non-Gaussian integration kernel $Omega$.

[97] N. Biagi, M. Bohmann, E. Agudelo, M. Bellini, and A. Zavatta, Experimental certification of nonclassicality via phase-space inequalities, arXiv:2010.00259 [quant-ph].

[98] R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).

[99] K. C. Tan, S. Choi, and H. Jeong, Negativity of Quasiprobability Distributions as a Measure of Nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110404 (2020).

[100] J. Park, J. Lee, and H. Nha Verifying nonclassicality beyond negativity in phase space, arXiv:2005.05739 [quant-ph]; J. Park and H. Nha, Efficient and faithful criteria on nonclassicality for continuous variables, presented at 15th International Conference on Squeezed States and Uncertainty Relations, Jeju, South Korea, 2017.

Cited by

[1] Jiyong Park, Jaehak Lee, and Hyunchul Nha, “Verifying nonclassicality beyond negativity in phase space”, arXiv:2005.05739.

[2] Nicola Biagi, Martin Bohmann, Elizabeth Agudelo, Marco Bellini, and Alessandro Zavatta, “Experimental certification of nonclassicality via phase-space inequalities”, arXiv:2010.00259.

The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2020-10-16 02:17:01). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

On Crossref’s cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-10-16 02:16:59).


Continue Reading


A quantum extension of SVM-perf for training nonlinear SVMs in almost linear time




Jonathan Allcock and Chang-Yu Hsieh

Tencent Quantum Laboratory

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.


We propose a quantum algorithm for training nonlinear support vector machines (SVM) for feature space learning where classical input data is encoded in the amplitudes of quantum states. Based on the classical SVM-perf algorithm of Joachims [1], our algorithm has a running time which scales linearly in the number of training examples $m$ (up to polylogarithmic factors) and applies to the standard soft-margin $ell_1$-SVM model. In contrast, while classical SVM-perf has demonstrated impressive performance on both linear and nonlinear SVMs, its efficiency is guaranteed only in certain cases: it achieves linear $m$ scaling only for linear SVMs, where classification is performed in the original input data space, or for the special cases of low-rank or shift-invariant kernels. Similarly, previously proposed quantum algorithms either have super-linear scaling in $m$, or else apply to different SVM models such as the hard-margin or least squares $ell_2$-SVM which lack certain desirable properties of the soft-margin $ell_1$-SVM model. We classically simulate our algorithm and give evidence that it can perform well in practice, and not only for asymptotically large data sets.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Thorsten Joachims. Training linear SVMs in linear time. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 217–226. ACM, 2006. 10.1145/​1150402.1150429.

[2] Bernhard E Boser, Isabelle M Guyon, and Vladimir N Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pages 144–152. ACM, 1992. 10.1145/​130385.130401.

[3] Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20 (3): 273–297, 1995. 10.1023/​A:1022627411411.

[4] Christopher JC Burges. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2 (2): 121–167, 1998. 10.1023/​A:1009715923555.

[5] Michael C Ferris and Todd S Munson. Interior-point methods for massive support vector machines. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13 (3): 783–804, 2002. 10.1137/​S1052623400374379.

[6] Olvi L Mangasarian and David R Musicant. Lagrangian support vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1 (Mar): 161–177, 2001. 10.1162/​15324430152748218.

[7] S Sathiya Keerthi and Dennis DeCoste. A modified finite Newton method for fast solution of large scale linear SVMs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6 (Mar): 341–361, 2005.

[8] Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Yoram Singer, Nathan Srebro, and Andrew Cotter. Pegasos: Primal Estimated sub-GrAdient SOlver for SVM. Mathematical programming, 127 (1): 3–30, 2011. 10.1145/​1273496.1273598.

[9] Bernhard Scholkopf and Alexander J Smola. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. MIT press, 2001.

[10] Christopher KI Williams and Matthias Seeger. Using the Nyström method to speed up kernel machines. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 682–688, 2001.

[11] Shai Fine and Katya Scheinberg. Efficient SVM training using low-rank kernel representations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2 (Dec): 243–264, 2001.

[12] Ali Rahimi and Benjamin Recht. Random features for large-scale kernel machines. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1177–1184, 2008.

[13] Thorsten Joachims. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning. MIT-press, 1999.

[14] John C Platt. Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. MIT press, 1999.

[15] Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2 (3): 27, 2011. 10.1145/​1961189.1961199.

[16] Ronan Collobert and Samy Bengio. SVMTorch: Support vector machines for large-scale regression problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1 (Feb): 143–160, 2001. 10.1162/​15324430152733142.

[17] Thorsten Joachims and Chun-Nam John Yu. Sparse kernel SVMs via cutting-plane training. Machine Learning, 76 (2-3): 179–193, 2009. 10.1007/​s10994-009-5126-6.

[18] Patrick Rebentrost, Masoud Mohseni, and Seth Lloyd. Quantum support vector machine for big data classification. Physical Review Letters, 113 (13): 130503, 2014. 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.113.130503.

[19] Vojtěch Havlíček, Antonio D Córcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567 (7747): 209–212, 2019. 10.1038/​s41586-019-0980-2.

[20] Maria Schuld and Nathan Killoran. Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces. Physical Review Letters, 122 (4): 040504, 2019. 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.040504.

[21] Iordanis Kerenidis, Anupam Prakash, and Dániel Szilágyi. Quantum algorithms for second-order cone programming and support vector machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06720, 2019.

[22] Tomasz Arodz and Seyran Saeedi. Quantum sparse support vector machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01879, 2019.

[23] Tongyang Li, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, and Xiaodi Wu. Sublinear quantum algorithms for training linear and kernel-based classifiers. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2019.

[24] Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Quantum random access memory. Physical Review Letters, 100 (16): 160501, 2008. 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.100.160501.

[25] Anupam Prakash. Quantum algorithms for linear algebra and machine learning. PhD thesis, UC Berkeley, 2014.

[26] Ewin Tang. A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 217–228, 2019. 10.1145/​3313276.3316310.

[27] Ewin Tang. Quantum-inspired classical algorithms for principal component analysis and supervised clustering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00414, 2018.

[28] András Gilyén, Seth Lloyd, and Ewin Tang. Quantum-inspired low-rank stochastic regression with logarithmic dependence on the dimension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04909, 2018.

[29] Juan Miguel Arrazola, Alain Delgado, Bhaskar Roy Bardhan, and Seth Lloyd. Quantum-inspired algorithms in practice. Quantum, 4: 307, 2020. 10.22331/​q-2020-08-13-307.

[30] Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004. 10.1017/​CBO9780511804441.

[31] Ioannis Tsochantaridis, Thorsten Joachims, Thomas Hofmann, and Yasemin Altun. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6 (Sep): 1453–1484, 2005.

[32] Jonathan Allcock, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Iordanis Kerenidis, and Shengyu Zhang. Quantum algorithms for feedforward neural networks. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 1 (1), 2020. 10.1145/​3411466.

[33] Iordanis Kerenidis and Anupam Prakash. Quantum recommendation systems. In 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2017. 10.4230/​LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.49.

[34] Mario Motta, Chong Sun, Adrian TK Tan, Matthew J O’Rourke, Erika Ye, Austin J Minnich, Fernando GSL Brandão, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution. Nature Physics, 16 (2): 205–210, 2020. 10.1038/​s41567-019-0704-4.

[35] Chang-Yu Hsieh, Qiming Sun, Shengyu Zhang, and Chee Kong Lee. Unitary-coupled restricted boltzmann machine ansatz for quantum simulations. https:/​/​​abs/​1912.02988, 2019.

[36] Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, and Alan Aspuru-Guzik. Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data. Quantum Science and Technology, 2 (4): 045001, 2017. 10.1088/​2058-9565/​aa8072.

[37] Edward Farhi and Hartmut Neven. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06002, 2018.

[38] Seth Lloyd, Maria Schuld, Aroosa Ijaz, Josh Isaac, and Nathan Killoran. Quantum embeddings for machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.03622, 2020.

[39] Gilles Brassard, Peter Hoyer, Michele Mosca, and Alain Tapp. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. Contemporary Mathematics, 305: 53–74, 2002.

Cited by


Continue Reading


Yao.jl: Extensible, Efficient Framework for Quantum Algorithm Design




Xiu-Zhe Luo1,2,3,4, Jin-Guo Liu1, Pan Zhang2, and Lei Wang1,5

1Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Canada
4Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada
5Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.


We introduce $texttt{Yao}$, an extensible, efficient open-source framework for quantum algorithm design. $texttt{Yao}$ features generic and differentiable programming of quantum circuits. It achieves state-of-the-art performance in simulating small to intermediate-sized quantum circuits that are relevant to near-term applications. We introduce the design principles and critical techniques behind $texttt{Yao}$. These include the quantum block intermediate representation of quantum circuits, a builtin automatic differentiation engine optimized for reversible computing, and batched quantum registers with GPU acceleration. The extensibility and efficiency of $texttt{Yao}$ help boost innovation in quantum algorithm design.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum, 2: 79, 2018. 10.22331/​q-2018-08-06-79.

[2] Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L O’brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature communications, 5: 4213, 2014a. 10.1038/​ncomms5213.

[3] Dave Wecker, Matthew B Hastings, and Matthias Troyer. Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms. Physical Review A, 92 (4): 042303, 2015. 10.1103/​physreva.92.042303.

[4] Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New Journal of Physics, 18 (2): 023023, 2016. 10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​2/​023023.

[5] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028, 2014.

[6] Edward Farhi and Hartmut Neven. Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1802.06002, February 2018.

[7] Kosuke Mitarai, Makoto Negoro, Masahiro Kitagawa, and Keisuke Fujii. Quantum circuit learning. Physical Review A, 98 (3): 032309, 2018. 10.1103/​physreva.98.032309.

[8] Marcello Benedetti, Delfina Garcia-Pintos, Oscar Perdomo, Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Yunseong Nam, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits. npj Quantum Information, 5 (1), May 2019a. ISSN 2056-6387. 10.1038/​s41534-019-0157-8. URL http:/​/​​10.1038/​s41534-019-0157-8.

[9] Jin-Guo Liu and Lei Wang. Differentiable learning of quantum circuit born machines. Physical Review A, 98 (6): 062324, 2018. 10.1103/​physreva.98.062324.

[10] Peter JJ O’Malley et al. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Physical Review X, 6 (3): 031007, 2016. 10.21236/​ada387360.

[11] Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549 (7671): 242, 2017a. 10.1038/​nature23879. URL https:/​/​​articles/​nature23879.

[12] Vojtěch Havlíček, Antonio D Córcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567 (7747): 209, 2019. 10.1038/​s41586-019-0980-2.

[13] Daiwei Zhu et al. Training of quantum circuits on a hybrid quantum computer. Science Advances, 5 (10): eaaw9918, 2019. 10.1126/​sciadv.aaw9918.

[14] G. Pagano, A. Bapat, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, A. De, P. W. Hess, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, W. L. Tan, C Baldwin, L T Brady, A Deshpande, F Liu, S Jordan, A V Gorshkov, and C Monroe. Quantum Approximate Optimization with a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator. 2019. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1906.02700.

[15] Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, and Oscar Perdomo. Robust implementation of generative modeling with parametrized quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08047, 2019.

[16] Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nat. Commun., 9 (1): 4812, 2018. ISSN 2041-1723. 10.1038/​s41467-018-07090-4. URL https:/​/​​10.1038/​s41467-018-07090-4.

[17] Tim Besard, Christophe Foket, and Bjorn De Sutter. Effective extensible programming: Unleashing julia on gpus. CoRR, abs/​1712.03112, 2017. 10.1109/​tpds.2018.2872064. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1712.03112.

[18] Guillermo García-Pérez, Matteo A. C. Rossi, and Sabrina Maniscalco. Ibm q experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems, 2019. URL https:/​/​​abs/​1906.07099. 10.1038/​s41534-019-0235-y.

[19] Differentiable Programming. https:/​/​​wiki/​Differentiable_programming, a.

[20] Karpathy, Andrej. Software 2.0. https:/​/​​@karpathy/​software-2-0-a64152b37c35.

[21] Tianqi Chen et al. Mxnet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01274, 2015.

[22] Martín Abadi et al. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th ${$USENIX$}$ Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (${$OSDI$}$ 16), pages 265–283, 2016.

[23] Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’ Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019. https:/​/​​abs/​1912.01703.

[24] Dougal Maclaurin, David Duvenaud, and Ryan P Adams. Autograd: Effortless gradients in numpy. In ICML 2015 AutoML Workshop, volume 238, 2015.

[25] Michael Innes, Elliot Saba, Keno Fischer, Dhairya Gandhi, Marco Concetto Rudilosso, Neethu Mariya Joy, Tejan Karmali, Avik Pal, and Viral Shah. Fashionable modelling with flux. CoRR, abs/​1811.01457, 2018. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1811.01457.

[26] Mike Innes, Alan Edelman, Keno Fischer, Chris Rackauckus, Elliot Saba, Viral B Shah, and Will Tebbutt. Zygote: A differentiable programming system to bridge machine learning and scientific computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07587, 2019.

[27] C. H. Bennett. Logical reversibility of computation. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 17 (6): 525–532, Nov 1973. ISSN 0018-8646. 10.1147/​rd.176.0525.

[28] Jin-Guo Liu, Yi-Hong Zhang, Yuan Wan, and Lei Wang. Variational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits. Phys. Rev. Research, 1: 023025, Sep 2019a. 10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.023025. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.023025.

[29] Alexander S Green, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Neil J Ross, Peter Selinger, and Benoı̂t Valiron. Quipper: a scalable quantum programming language. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 48, pages 333–342. ACM, 2013. 10.1145/​2491956.2462177.

[30] Damian S Steiger, Thomas Häner, and Matthias Troyer. Projectq: an open source software framework for quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08091, 2016. 10.22331/​q-2018-01-31-49.

[31] Krysta Svore, Martin Roetteler, Alan Geller, Matthias Troyer, John Azariah, Christopher Granade, Bettina Heim, Vadym Kliuchnikov, Mariia Mykhailova, and Andres Paz. Q#: Enabling scalable quantum computing and development with a high-level dsl. Proceedings of the Real World Domain Specific Languages Workshop 2018 on – RWDSL2018, 2018. 10.1145/​3183895.3183901. URL http:/​/​​10.1145/​3183895.3183901.

[32] Cirq: A Python framework for creating, editing, and invoking noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) circuits. https:/​/​​quantumlib/​Cirq.

[33] qulacs: Variational Quantum Circuit Simulator for Quantum Computation Research. https:/​/​​qulacs/​qulacs.

[34] Ville Bergholm, Josh Izaac, Maria Schuld, Christian Gogolin, and Nathan Killoran. Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968, 2018.

[35] Héctor Abraham et al. Qiskit: An open-source framework for quantum computing, 2019.

[36] Tyson Jones, Anna Brown, Ian Bush, and Simon C. Benjamin. Quest and high performance simulation of quantum computers. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), Jul 2019. ISSN 2045-2322. 10.1038/​s41598-019-47174-9. URL http:/​/​​10.1038/​s41598-019-47174-9.

[37] Mark Fingerhuth, Tomáš Babej, and Peter Wittek. Open source software in quantum computing. PloS one, 13 (12): e0208561, 2018. 10.1371/​journal.pone.0208561.

[38] Ryan LaRose. Overview and Comparison of Gate Level Quantum Software Platforms. Quantum, 3: 130, March 2019. ISSN 2521-327X. 10.22331/​q-2019-03-25-130. URL https:/​/​​10.22331/​q-2019-03-25-130.

[39] Marcello Benedetti, Erika Lloyd, Stefan Sack, and Mattia Fiorentini. Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models. Quantum Science and Technology, 4 (4): 043001, nov 2019b. 10.1088/​2058-9565/​ab4eb5. URL https:/​/​​10.1088.

[40] J. Bezanson. “Why is Julia fast? Can it be faster?” 2015, JuliaCon India. https:/​/​​watch?v=xUP3cSKb8sI.

[41] Jeff Bezanson, Stefan Karpinski, Viral B Shah, and Alan Edelman. Julia: A fast dynamic language for technical computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.5145, 2012.

[42] Jarrod R. McClean et al. Openfermion: The electronic structure package for quantum computers, jun 2020. URL https:/​/​​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ab8ebc.

[43] D Coppersmith. An approximate fourier transform useful in quantum computing. Technical report, Technical report, IBM Research Division, 1994. https:/​/​​abs/​quant-ph/​0201067.

[44] Artur Ekert and Richard Jozsa. Quantum computation and shor’s factoring algorithm. Reviews of Modern Physics, 68 (3): 733, 1996. 10.1103/​RevModPhys.68.733.

[45] Richard Jozsa. Quantum algorithms and the fourier transform. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454 (1969): 323–337, 1998. 10.1098/​rspa.1998.0163.

[46] Peter J Karalekas, Nikolas A Tezak, Eric C Peterson, Colm A Ryan, Marcus P da Silva, and Robert S Smith. A quantum-classical cloud platform optimized for variational hybrid algorithms. Quantum Science and Technology, 5 (2): 024003, apr 2020. 10.1088/​2058-9565/​ab7559. URL https:/​/​​10.1088.

[47] Krylovkit.jl: Krylov methods for linear problems, eigenvalues, singular values and matrix functions. https:/​/​​Jutho/​KrylovKit.jl.

[48] Christopher Rackauckas and Qing Nie. Differentialequations.jl – a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in julia. The Journal of Open Research Software, 5 (1), 2017. 10.5334/​jors.151. URL https:/​/​​details/​publication/​pub.1085583166 and http:/​/​​articles/​10.5334/​jors.151/​galley/​245/​download/​. Exported from https:/​/​ on 2019/​05/​05.

[49] Atilim Gunes Baydin, Barak A Pearlmutter, Alexey Andreyevich Radul, and Jeffrey Mark Siskind. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of machine learning research, 18 (153), 2018. https:/​/​​abs/​1502.05767.

[50] Andreas Griewank and Andrea Walther. Evaluating Derivatives. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, jan 2008. 10.1137/​1.9780898717761. URL https:/​/​​10.1137.

[51] Aidan N Gomez, Mengye Ren, Raquel Urtasun, and Roger B Grosse. The reversible residual network: Backpropagation without storing activations. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2214–2224, 2017.

[52] Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David K Duvenaud. Neural ordinary differential equations. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 6571–6583, 2018a.

[53] Akira Hirose. Complex-valued neural networks: theories and applications, volume 5. World Scientific, 2003. 10.1142/​5345.

[54] Mike Giles. An extended collection of matrix derivative results for forward and reverse mode algorithmic differentiation. Technical report, 2008. URL https:/​/​​gilesm/​files/​NA-08-01.pdf.

[55] Jin-Guo Liu, Liang Mao, Pan Zhang, and Lei Wang. Solving quantum statistical mechanics with variational autoregressive networks and quantum circuits. 2019b. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1912.11381.

[56] Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L O’brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun., 5: 4213, 2014b. 10.1038/​ncomms5213. URL https:/​/​​articles/​ncomms5213.

[57] Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549 (7671): 242, 2017b. 10.1038/​nature23879.

[58] Gavin E Crooks. Gradients of parameterized quantum gates using the parameter-shift rule and gate decomposition. URL https:/​/​​abs/​1905.13311.

[59] Jun Li, Xiaodong Yang, Xinhua Peng, and Chang-Pu Sun. Hybrid quantum-classical approach to quantum optimal control. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118: 150503, Apr 2017. 10.1103/​physrevlett.118.150503. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.118.150503.

[60] Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran. Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware. Phys. Rev. A, 99 (3): 032331, 2019. ISSN 24699934. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.032331.

[61] Ken M Nakanishi, Keisuke Fujii, and Synge Todo. Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms. 10.21236/​ada212800. URL https:/​/​​abs/​1903.12166.

[62] Shakir Mohamed, Mihaela Rosca, Michael Figurnov, and Andriy Mnih. Monte carlo gradient estimation in machine learning. URL https:/​/​​abs/​1906.10652.

[63] Chun-Liang Li, Wei-Cheng Chang, Yu Cheng, Yiming Yang, and Barnabás Póczos. MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Network. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1705.08584.

[64] Arthur Gretton, Karsten M Borgwardt, Malte J Rasch, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Smola. A kernel two-sample test. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13 (Mar): 723–773, 2012. URL http:/​/​​papers/​v13/​gretton12a.html.

[65] Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge university press, 2010. 10.1017/​cbo9780511976667.016.

[66] William James Huggins, Piyush Patil, Bradley Mitchell, K Birgitta Whaley, and Miles Stoudenmire. Towards quantum machine learning with tensor networks. Quantum Science and Technology, 2018. 10.1088/​2058-9565/​aaea94.

[67] Frederica Darema, David A George, V Alan Norton, and Gregory F Pfister. A single-program-multiple-data computational model for epex/​fortran. Parallel Computing, 7 (1): 11–24, 1988. 10.1016/​0167-8191(88)90094-4.

[68] Statically sized arrays for Julia. https:/​/​​JuliaArrays/​StaticArrays.jl.

[69] A luxury sparse matrix package for julia. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​LuxurySparse.jl.

[70] Thomas Häner and Damian S Steiger. 0.5 petabyte simulation of a 45-qubit quantum circuit. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, page 33. ACM, 2017. 10.1145/​3126908.3126947.

[71] Igor L Markov and Yaoyun Shi. Simulating quantum computation by contracting tensor networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 38 (3): 963–981, 2008. 10.1137/​050644756.

[72] Edwin Pednault, John A Gunnels, Giacomo Nannicini, Lior Horesh, Thomas Magerlein, Edgar Solomonik, and Robert Wisnieff. Breaking the 49-qubit barrier in the simulation of quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05867, 2017.

[73] Fang Zhang et al. Alibaba cloud quantum development kit: Large-scale classical simulation of quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11217, 2019.

[74] Pyquest-cffi: A python interface to the quest quantum simulator (cffi based). https:/​/​​HQSquantumsimulations/​PyQuEST-cffi.

[75] PennyLane is a cross-platform Python library for quantum machine learning, automatic differentiation, and optimization of hybrid quantum-classical computations. https:/​/​​XanaduAI/​pennylane, a.

[76] Review of PennyLane benchmark. https:/​/​​Roger-luo/​quantum-benchmarks/​pull/​7, b.

[77] Aer is a high performance simulator for quantum circuits that includes noise models. https:/​/​​Qiskit/​qiskit-aer, a.

[78] Terra provides the foundations for Qiskit. It allows the user to write quantum circuits easily, and takes care of the constraints of real hardware. https:/​/​​Qiskit/​qiskit-terra, b.

[79] py.test fixture for benchmarking code. https:/​/​​ionelmc/​pytest-benchmark.

[80] Jiahao Chen and Jarrett Revels. Robust benchmarking in noisy environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.04295, 2016.

[81] Benchmarking Quantum Circuit Emulators For Your Daily Research Usage. https:/​/​​Roger-luo/​quantum-benchmarks.

[82] Frank Arute et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574 (7779): 505–510, 2019. 10.1038/​s41586-019-1666-5.

[83] CuYao.jl: CUDA extension for Yao.jl. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​CuYao.jl.

[84] Jinfeng Zeng, Yufeng Wu, Jin-Guo Liu, Lei Wang, and Jiangping Hu. Learning and inference on generative adversarial quantum circuits. Physical Review A, 99 (5): 052306, 2019. 10.1103/​physreva.99.052306.

[85] Weishi Wang, Jin-Guo Liu, and Lei Wang. A variational quantum state compression algorithm. to appear.

[86] Vivek V. Shende, Igor L. Markov, and Stephen S. Bullock. Minimal universal two-qubit controlled-not-based circuits. Phys. Rev. A, 69: 062321, Jun 2004. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.69.062321. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.69.062321.

[87] Michael Innes. Don’t unroll adjoint: Differentiating ssa-form programs. CoRR, abs/​1810.07951, 2018. URL http:/​/​​abs/​1810.07951.

[88] Andrew W Cross, Lev S Bishop, John A Smolin, and Jay M Gambetta. Open quantum assembly language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03429, 2017.

[89] Xiang Fu et al. eqasm: An executable quantum instruction set architecture. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pages 224–237. IEEE, 2019. 10.1109/​hpca.2019.00040.

[90] Robert S Smith, Michael J Curtis, and William J Zeng. A practical quantum instruction set architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03355, 2016.

[91] RBNF: A DSL for modern parsing. https:/​/​​thautwarm/​RBNF.jl.

[92] Bidirectional transformation between Yao Quantum Block IR and QASM. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​YaoQASM.jl, a.

[93] YaoLang: The next DSL for Yao and quantum programs. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​YaoLang.jl, b.

[94] ZXCalculus.jl: An implementation of ZX-calculus in Julia. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​ZXCalculus.jl, c.

[95] Aleks Kissinger and John van de Wetering. PyZX: Large Scale Automated Diagrammatic Reasoning. In Bob Coecke and Matthew Leifer, editors, Proceedings 16th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA., 10-14 June 2019, volume 318 of Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 229–241. Open Publishing Association, 2020. 10.4204/​EPTCS.318.14.

[96] Raban Iten, David Sutter, and Stefan Woerner. Efficient template matching in quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05270, 2019.

[97] Dmitri Maslov, Gerhard W Dueck, D Michael Miller, and Camille Negrevergne. Quantum circuit simplification and level compaction. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 27 (3): 436–444, 2008. 10.1109/​tcad.2007.911334.

[98] Aleks Kissinger and John van de Wetering. Reducing T-count with the ZX-calculus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10477, 2019. 10.1103/​PhysRevA.102.022406.

[99] Piotr Gawron, Dariusz Kurzyk, and Łukasz Pawela. Quantuminformation.jl—a julia package for numerical computation in quantum information theory. PLOS ONE, 13 (12): e0209358, Dec 2018. ISSN 1932-6203. 10.1371/​journal.pone.0209358. URL http:/​/​​10.1371/​journal.pone.0209358.

[100] Sergio Boixo, Sergei V Isakov, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, and Hartmut Neven. Simulation of low-depth quantum circuits as complex undirected graphical models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05384, 2017.

[101] Jianxin Chen, Fang Zhang, Mingcheng Chen, Cupjin Huang, Michael Newman, and Yaoyun Shi. Classical simulation of intermediate-size quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01450, 2018b.

[102] Chu Guo, Yong Liu, Min Xiong, Shichuan Xue, Xiang Fu, Anqi Huang, Xiaogang Qiang, Ping Xu, Junhua Liu, Shenggen Zheng, He-Liang Huang, Mingtang Deng, Dario Poletti, Wan-Su Bao, and Junjie Wu. General-purpose quantum circuit simulator with projected entangled-pair states and the quantum supremacy frontier. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123: 190501, Nov 2019. 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.123.190501. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.123.190501.

[103] Feng Pan, Pengfei Zhou, Sujie Li, and Pan Zhang. Contracting arbitrary tensor networks: general approximate algorithm and applications in graphical models and quantum circuit simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020. 10.1103/​PhysRevLett.125.060503.

[104] Edwin Stoudenmire and David J Schwab. Supervised learning with tensor networks. pages 4799–4807, 2016. URL http:/​/​​paper/​6211-supervised-learning-with-tensor-networks.pdf.

[105] Zhao-Yu Han, Jun Wang, Heng Fan, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang. Unsupervised generative modeling using matrix product states. Phys. Rev. X, 8: 031012, Jul 2018. 10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031012. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031012.

[106] Song Cheng, Lei Wang, Tao Xiang, and Pan Zhang. Tree tensor networks for generative modeling. Phys. Rev. B, 99: 155131, Apr 2019. 10.1103/​PhysRevB.99.155131. URL https:/​/​​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.99.155131.

[107] Ivan Glasser, Ryan Sweke, Nicola Pancotti, Jens Eisert, and Ignacio Cirac. Expressive power of tensor-network factorizations for probabilistic modeling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1496–1508, 2019.

[108] Tai-Danae Bradley, E M Stoudenmire, and John Terilla. Modeling sequences with quantum states: a look under the hood. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 1 (3): 035008, jul 2020. 10.1088/​2632-2153/​ab8731. URL https:/​/​​10.1088.

[109] YaoTensorNetwork: Dump a quantum circuit in Yao to a tensor network graph model. https:/​/​​QuantumBFS/​YaoTensorNetwork.jl, d.

[110] Sergio Boixo, Sergei V Isakov, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J Bremner, John M Martinis, and Hartmut Neven. Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. Nature Physics, 14 (6): 595, 2018. 10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x.

[111] Miriam Backens. The ZX-calculus is complete for stabilizer quantum mechanics. New Journal of Physics, 16 (9): 093021, sep 2014. 10.1088/​1367-2630/​16/​9/​093021. URL https:/​/​​10.1088.

[112] Multi-language suite for high-performance solvers of differential equations. https:/​/​​JuliaDiffEq/​DifferentialEquations.jl, b.

[113] General Permutation Matrix. https:/​/​​wiki/​Generalized_permutation_matrix.

[114] Thomas Häner, Damian S Steiger, Mikhail Smelyanskiy, and Matthias Troyer. High performance emulation of quantum circuits. In SC’16: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 866–874. IEEE, 2016. 10.1109/​sc.2016.73.

[115] Ryan LaRose, Arkin Tikku, Étude O’Neel-Judy, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. Variational quantum state diagonalization. npj Quantum Information, 5 (1), Jun 2019. ISSN 2056-6387. 10.1038/​s41534-019-0167-6. URL http:/​/​​10.1038/​s41534-019-0167-6.

[116] Cristina Cirstoiu, Zoe Holmes, Joseph Iosue, Lukasz Cincio, Patrick J. Coles, and Andrew Sornborger. Variational fast forwarding for quantum simulation beyond the coherence time, 2019. 10.1038/​s41534-020-00302-0.

[117] Lukasz Cincio, Yiğit Subaşı, Andrew T Sornborger, and Patrick J Coles. Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap. New Journal of Physics, 20 (11): 113022, Nov 2018. ISSN 1367-2630. 10.1088/​1367-2630/​aae94a. URL http:/​/​​10.1088/​1367-2630/​aae94a.

[118] Xiaoguang Wang, Zhe Sun, and Z. D. Wang. Operator fidelity susceptibility: An indicator of quantum criticality. Physical Review A, 79 (1), Jan 2009. ISSN 1094-1622. 10.1103/​physreva.79.012105. URL http:/​/​​10.1103/​PhysRevA.79.012105.

[119] Richard H Byrd, Peihuang Lu, Jorge Nocedal, and Ciyou Zhu. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 16 (5): 1190–1208, 1995. 10.2172/​204262. URL https:/​/​​10.1137/​0916069.

[120] Patrick Kofod Mogensen and Asbjørn Nilsen Riseth. Optim: A mathematical optimization package for Julia. Journal of Open Source Software, 3 (24): 615, 2018. 10.21105/​joss.00615.

Cited by

[1] Feng Pan, Pengfei Zhou, Sujie Li, and Pan Zhang, “Contracting Arbitrary Tensor Networks: General Approximate Algorithm and Applications in Graphical Models and Quantum Circuit Simulations”, Physical Review Letters 125 6, 060503 (2020).

[2] Jin-Guo Liu, Liang Mao, Pan Zhang, and Lei Wang, “Solving Quantum Statistical Mechanics with Variational Autoregressive Networks and Quantum Circuits”, arXiv:1912.11381.

[3] Sirui Lu, Lu-Ming Duan, and Dong-Ling Deng, “Quantum adversarial machine learning”, Physical Review Research 2 3, 033212 (2020).

[4] Tatiana A. Bespalova and Oleksandr Kyriienko, “Hamiltonian operator approximation for energy measurement and ground state preparation”, arXiv:2009.03351.

[5] Tong Liu, Jin-Guo Liu, and Heng Fan, “Probabilistic Nonunitary Gate in Imaginary Time Evolution”, arXiv:2006.09726.

[6] Jin-Guo Liu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, “Tropical Tensor Network for Ground States of Spin Glasses”, arXiv:2008.06888.

[7] Jin-Guo Liu and Taine Zhao, “Differentiate Everything with a Reversible Domain-Specific Language”, arXiv:2003.04617.

[8] Carsten Bauer, “Fast and stable determinant quantum Monte Carlo”, arXiv:2003.05286.

[9] Chen Zhao and Xiao-Shan Gao, “QDNN: DNN with Quantum Neural Network Layers”, arXiv:1912.12660.

[10] The Quingo Development Team, “Quingo: A Programming Framework for Heterogeneous Quantum-Classical Computing with NISQ Features”, arXiv:2009.01686.

[11] Andrea Mari, Thomas R. Bromley, and Nathan Killoran, “Estimating the gradient and higher-order derivatives on quantum hardware”, arXiv:2008.06517.

[12] Stavros Efthymiou, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Carlos Bravo-Prieto, Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Diego García-Martín, Artur Garcia-Saez, José Ignacio Latorre, and Stefano Carrazza, “Qibo: a framework for quantum simulation with hardware acceleration”, arXiv:2009.01845.

[13] Vincent Paul Su, “Variational Preparation of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Thermofield Double”, arXiv:2009.04488.

The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2020-10-16 04:52:30). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

On Crossref’s cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-10-16 04:52:29).


Continue Reading
Energy2 hours ago

Global Force Sensors Markets to 2025: Improvement of Medical Devices with Force Sensor Technology will Drive the Market

Energy2 hours ago

Black Mamba Rod Lift and Oil Baron Supply Join Forces, Increasing Run-Times, Preventing Tubing Wear and Cavitation in Progressive Cavity Wells.

Esports2 hours ago

2K Games Alienates Players by Adding Unskippable Ads to NBA 2K21

Esports2 hours ago

Get Hype for Halloween With Hyper Scape’s Latest Event Trailer

Energy2 hours ago

Waterproofing Systems Market by Type, Application, and Region – Global Forecast to 2025

Esports2 hours ago

Rocket League Haunted Hallows Event Returns Oct. 20

Energy3 hours ago

$824 Million Worldwide Mobile Substation Industry to 2027 – Impact of COVID-19 on the Market

Esports3 hours ago

League of Legends Preseason 2021: 5 Things We Want

Esports3 hours ago

The Sims 4 Snowy Escape Pack Trailer Reveal is Coming Tuesday

Energy3 hours ago

Georgia Power launches new careers website for students as part of Careers in Energy Week

Cleantech4 hours ago

GM Unveils Factory ZERO

Cleantech4 hours ago

Volvo Trucks Receives Grants to Deploy VNR Electric Trucks in Southern California

Energy6 hours ago

Freeport-McMoRan’s Steve Higgins Elected as Chairman of the Board of the International Copper Association

Energy6 hours ago

Nufarm and CROP.ZONE Announce Cooperation to Bring Alternative Weed Control to Major European Markets

Energy6 hours ago

Global Belt and Chain Drives Market, 2020-2024: Growth Opportunities in Collaboration & Use of Newer Materials Enabling Broader Capabilities

Energy6 hours ago

New Report Shows Critical Impact of Oil and Gas Industry in Los Angeles County

Big Data6 hours ago

Best Apps to Check Internet Speed

Esports6 hours ago

Python joins Heretics

Energy7 hours ago

Ultra Safe Nuclear Technologies Delivers Advanced Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Design To NASA

AR/VR7 hours ago

The Virtual Arena: The Ascendance of Arena-Scale Entertainment – Part 1

AR/VR8 hours ago

Pimax Secures $20m in Series B Funding Round

Fintech8 hours ago

Minimum Wage Workers Can Now Get Guaranteed Payday Loans No Matter What In Canada

Energy9 hours ago

Volvo Trucks Awarded $21.7M from U.S. EPA and South Coast AQMD to Deploy 70 Class 8 VNR Electric Zero-Emission Trucks

Energy9 hours ago

Trilliant Partners with 1NCE for a Cost-Effective Cellular Solution to Cover the Last Mile for IIoT

Energy9 hours ago

LyondellBasell Hosts Annual Global Care Day Supporting Food Security

Energy9 hours ago

Insider Buying Signals Gold Industry Momentum

Energy9 hours ago

In New Book, Veteran Journalist Shows How to End California’s Water Wars, Protect Habitats and Meet State’s Water Needs

Blockchain9 hours ago

How Does the Future Look for Cryptocurrencies in the Financial Market?

Cyber Security10 hours ago

Simple Steps To Protect Your Business Data Across Mobile Devices

Esports10 hours ago

BLAST Premier Fall Series schedule revealed

Esports11 hours ago

Apeks sign jkaem

Blockchain12 hours ago

How Blockchain Can Help Your Business Grow

Cyber Security12 hours ago

Quelques conseils pour améliorer la sécurité informatique afin de ne pas perdre des données personnelles

Aviation13 hours ago

Norwegian’s New Airbus A321LR Fleet – What To Expect

Ripple Price
Blockchain14 hours ago

Charted: Ripple (XRP) Technicals Suggest a Crucial Breakdown Below $0.24

Fintech14 hours ago

Insurtech Bolttech Expands Its Footprint to South Korea With LG U+

Aviation14 hours ago

Remember The Interjet-Aeromar Codeshare? Its Over

Blockchain14 hours ago

Savvy Traders Are Capitalizing on Two New Crypto Assets, Says Bitcoin Bull Tyler Swope – Here’s How

Aviation15 hours ago

One Of The World’s Busiest International Routes Is Less Than 300km Long

Aviation15 hours ago

Western Sydney cover up possible, hints top bureaucrat